It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by smyleegrl
Originally posted by pavmas
Originally posted by smyleegrl
reply to post by pavmas
Britain is divided and rotten to the core and untill we have an elected figurehead that represents all the people it will remain so.
Does the Prime Minister not fulfill this role? I mean, I know not everyone likes the PM (same as not every American likes Obama) but he is an elected official, correct?
No
The Elected prime minister must go to Buck Place and ask The queens permission to form a government.
A president would not
I did not know this. Thank you for clarifying! I always thought the PM was in control of the country, and the monarchy were more figure heads. I didn't realize the Queen still had power.
Originally posted by michael1983l
reply to post by smyleegrl
smylee,
I think you are asking in the wrong place if you want an accurate answer to this question. I believe many ATS'ers who are British will not appreciate our Monarchy because they are prone to believing conspiracy theorys, thats why we are here right? The truth is that most of society do not have much of an opinion on the Royals and then you get the polarised pro Royal's and Anti-Royal's of which I would say there seems to be about a 50/50 split. The last 12 months, with the Royal Wedding and the Olympics though has done the Monarchy a world of good as it has given back some national pride to some that had began to lose it.
I myself am very pro monarchy in its current format with its current incumbents. I personally think that the Royal Family keep their noses out, where it doesn't belong, whilst still providing us with a unique national identity. The Royal Family aside from a few like Andrew are great ambassedors for the UK and they work tirelessly. Our British heritidge is rich and our Monarchy is a big part of that, it is a constitutional Monarchy so that sits well with us.
You get those that moan about having to pay for them and that they are freeloaders, but the reality is that we each pay 20 pence a year towards our Monarchy in taxes and the money brought in for Tourism is exceptionally greater than what they cost us. Diplomatically as well they command a lot of respect around the globe mostly because they have done their role so well.
So be careful when you are listening to the Royal bashers on here, their voices are generally not as loud in a true cross section of British society.
Originally posted by michael1983l
reply to post by pavmas
Go on pavmas, which laws would those be, that discriminate against Catholics. I am genuinely interested to know, so please educate me.
Originally posted by michael1983l
reply to post by pavmas
Go on pavmas, which laws would those be, that discriminate against Catholics. I am genuinely interested to know, so please educate me.
Originally posted by pavmas
Originally posted by michael1983l
reply to post by pavmas
Go on pavmas, which laws would those be, that discriminate against Catholics. I am genuinely interested to know, so please educate me.
Act of Settlement 1701
www.royal.gov.uk...
I think you are asking in the wrong place if you want an accurate answer to this question. I believe many ATS'ers who are British will not appreciate our Monarchy because they are prone to believing conspiracy theorys
Originally posted by pavmas
Originally posted by michael1983l
reply to post by smyleegrl
smylee,
I think you are asking in the wrong place if you want an accurate answer to this question. I believe many ATS'ers who are British will not appreciate our Monarchy because they are prone to believing conspiracy theorys, thats why we are here right? The truth is that most of society do not have much of an opinion on the Royals and then you get the polarised pro Royal's and Anti-Royal's of which I would say there seems to be about a 50/50 split. The last 12 months, with the Royal Wedding and the Olympics though has done the Monarchy a world of good as it has given back some national pride to some that had began to lose it.
I myself am very pro monarchy in its current format with its current incumbents. I personally think that the Royal Family keep their noses out, where it doesn't belong, whilst still providing us with a unique national identity. The Royal Family aside from a few like Andrew are great ambassedors for the UK and they work tirelessly. Our British heritidge is rich and our Monarchy is a big part of that, it is a constitutional Monarchy so that sits well with us.
You get those that moan about having to pay for them and that they are freeloaders, but the reality is that we each pay 20 pence a year towards our Monarchy in taxes and the money brought in for Tourism is exceptionally greater than what they cost us. Diplomatically as well they command a lot of respect around the globe mostly because they have done their role so well.
So be careful when you are listening to the Royal bashers on here, their voices are generally not as loud in a true cross section of British society.
lol thats like saying
Hitler kept his nose out of gassing all the jews.
They are at the very top and others suffer discrimination because of it.
Originally posted by mee30
reply to post by michael1983l
I think you are asking in the wrong place if you want an accurate answer to this question. I believe many ATS'ers who are British will not appreciate our Monarchy because they are prone to believing conspiracy theorys
Can I just say you make me pretty sick sir! Trying to discredit people who disagree with you by using the magic conspiracy theory term... Listen mate I believe in conspiracy FACT, okay? Here is a few for you to digest... There may well be other events that I have my doubts about and I certainly have my doubts about "official stories" and if you could be bothered to watch this most professional documentary you might see why I am justified for that...
It is all there in one neat package, and that is just the tip of the iceberg... We have the phone hacking scandal and the cash for questions and a whole host of other things... Besides my knowledge of these conspiracy EVENTS has no bearing on my opinion of the so called royal family... Right down to the philosophical level the idea of a family claiming some right to be classed as "royal" is just plain wrong! There is no justification for it...
You are right though in one respect and that is that some British people love this ridiculous mess which is beyond me but to each their own, I will not be stolen form to give to them though or to attack other countries based on pure LIES, is that okay with you? Or do you advocate that I be kidnapped and thrown in prison for disagreeing with you?
Originally posted by smyleegrl
Originally posted by pavmas
Originally posted by smyleegrl
reply to post by pavmas
Britain is divided and rotten to the core and untill we have an elected figurehead that represents all the people it will remain so.
Does the Prime Minister not fulfill this role? I mean, I know not everyone likes the PM (same as not every American likes Obama) but he is an elected official, correct?
No
The Elected prime minister must go to Buck Place and ask The queens permission to form a government.
A president would not
I did not know this. Thank you for clarifying! I always thought the PM was in control of the country, and the monarchy were more figure heads. I didn't realize the Queen still had power.
Originally posted by Freeborn
reply to post by smyleegrl
The Royal Family are a quaint anachronism that provide some sort of cultural link to the past.
They have a purely ceremonial role.
It's true that newly appointed Prime Minister has to go to Buckingham Palace and ask 'permission' to form a government, but this is purely ceremonial.
If she was ever to deny permission it would lead to a constitutional crisis that I suspect would lead to the end of the Royal Family.
We fought a Civil War and killed a ruling a ruling monarch over this very issue - and I and many like me would be prepared to do it again if I ever thought that the Royal Family were trying to interfere in the governing of this country.
The crunch will come when Charles succeeds Liz.
Whilst Elizabeth is highly respected by many Charles is very much viewed as aloof and out of touch with the British people.
He could very easily alienate himself and subsequently diminish Royal support.
Generally speaking there is great hope for Charles son's - William and Harry.
Personally I don't really care - as long as they don't cost too much and as I said before don't interfere then I think there are far more important things that need addressing in this country.edit on 13/1/13 by Freeborn because: Spelling, grammar, clarity etc
Originally posted by smyleegrl
Do you see them as (I hate to use this word, but none other comes to mind) a mascot of sorts, that represents your country, your values, your essence?
Originally posted by hotel1
The second in line to the UK throne is currently on secondment to the Royal Air Force from the Army as Search and Rescue (SAR) Aircrew, and as I understand it the third in line is on operational deployment in Afghanistan. Would the the incumbent President, and Vice President of the US be doing simmilar things.
At one time I heard that Charles might not be the next King, that the succession might skip him and go straight to William.
Any possibility of this?
Originally posted by michael1983l
Originally posted by pavmas
Originally posted by michael1983l
reply to post by smyleegrl
smylee,
I think you are asking in the wrong place if you want an accurate answer to this question. I believe many ATS'ers who are British will not appreciate our Monarchy because they are prone to believing conspiracy theorys, thats why we are here right? The truth is that most of society do not have much of an opinion on the Royals and then you get the polarised pro Royal's and Anti-Royal's of which I would say there seems to be about a 50/50 split. The last 12 months, with the Royal Wedding and the Olympics though has done the Monarchy a world of good as it has given back some national pride to some that had began to lose it.
I myself am very pro monarchy in its current format with its current incumbents. I personally think that the Royal Family keep their noses out, where it doesn't belong, whilst still providing us with a unique national identity. The Royal Family aside from a few like Andrew are great ambassedors for the UK and they work tirelessly. Our British heritidge is rich and our Monarchy is a big part of that, it is a constitutional Monarchy so that sits well with us.
You get those that moan about having to pay for them and that they are freeloaders, but the reality is that we each pay 20 pence a year towards our Monarchy in taxes and the money brought in for Tourism is exceptionally greater than what they cost us. Diplomatically as well they command a lot of respect around the globe mostly because they have done their role so well.
So be careful when you are listening to the Royal bashers on here, their voices are generally not as loud in a true cross section of British society.
lol thats like saying
Hitler kept his nose out of gassing all the jews.
They are at the very top and others suffer discrimination because of it.
Here you go smylee, this is the kind of person I warned you about. Anybody that displays this kind of hatred and at the same time does not provide any reasoned argument is in my opinion, not worth listening to.