It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by DarthMuerte
reply to post by boymonkey74
I did. I also answered your question with information that took less than 1 second for google to locate. Our President is not a king, imperial ambitions of the last two occupants not withstanding. He cannot just change the law of the land at will. Unlike Europeans, correct me if I am wrong but I see no information to the contrary, we believe that our rights are not granted us by our government. Ultimate power and sovereignty resides not in the state, this includes our federal government, but in the people the citizens of our nation. THAT IS WHY WE HAVE THE SECOND AMENDMENT! We have the right to overthrow our government should the necessity arise. THe second amendment ensures we have the power to enforce that right.
Originally posted by MrInquisitive
Originally posted by DarthMuerte
reply to post by boymonkey74
I did. I also answered your question with information that took less than 1 second for google to locate. Our President is not a king, imperial ambitions of the last two occupants not withstanding. He cannot just change the law of the land at will. Unlike Europeans, correct me if I am wrong but I see no information to the contrary, we believe that our rights are not granted us by our government. Ultimate power and sovereignty resides not in the state, this includes our federal government, but in the people the citizens of our nation. THAT IS WHY WE HAVE THE SECOND AMENDMENT! We have the right to overthrow our government should the necessity arise. THe second amendment ensures we have the power to enforce that right.
How ironic that as an American you don't know what the 2nd amendment is about or for. Here is what it says:
"A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed."
The security of a free state, what is that? One that is not conquered or subject to the whims of another. And a well-regulated militia is needed for this. What is a well-regulated militia? Who would doing the regulating? I'd imagine some level of government would. This government-regulated militia is going to be used to overthrow the government? I don't think so. But let's say you're right and that is what it means, well the Confederate states tried this once and failed. You really think a bunch of Rambo wannabe with a few guns -- and I'll even throw in assault rifles -- are going to be overthrow the US government and all of its military and surveillance forces? Get serious.
And really the 2nd Amendment is an artifact because we have no well-regulated militia of citizenry. The National Guar, since WWI, has been used for foreign military adventures and no longer functions to protect the homeland. During hurricane Katrina there weren't enough N.G. helicopters for rescue operations because they were mostly over in Iraq killing Iraqis in order to get oil contracts for petroleum multinationals.
So no, don't buy your big, bad patriotic 2nd Amendment claims.edit on 17-12-2012 by MrInquisitive because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by DarthMuerte
reply to post by boymonkey74
I did. I also answered your question with information that took less than 1 second for google to locate. Our President is not a king, imperial ambitions of the last two occupants not withstanding. He cannot just change the law of the land at will. Unlike Europeans, correct me if I am wrong but I see no information to the contrary, we believe that our rights are not granted us by our government. Ultimate power and sovereignty resides not in the state, this includes our federal government, but in the people the citizens of our nation. THAT IS WHY WE HAVE THE SECOND AMENDMENT! We have the right to overthrow our government should the necessity arise. THe second amendment ensures we have the power to enforce that right.
Originally posted by spangledbanner
reply to post by DarthMuerte
Ha!
Damn, I kinda wanted to argue. I agree that many commenting on the constitution from UK have no idea.
Originally posted by zedVSzardoz
reply to post by MrInquisitive
EDIT:
did you know that the revolutionary war was fought with less than a third of the total population in support of it?
They also beat the best trained and equipped army of the time. The English crown sent wave after wave of the best trained and equipped troops in the world to quell the rebellion, even sending the best mercenary armies of the time (Hessians), but it wasn't enough.
I do not support a violent revolution, but get serious, if we wanted one in the US we would have it and it would not be "crushed" so easily. England was "unbeatable" yet some farmers and shop keepers beat them back into the ocean, SEVERAL TIMES, until they stopped coming back.
Also,
Europeans are more inclined to be willing subjects to the UN and her mandates. They are more supportive of any of its resolutions since the EU usually falls in line with what is practically the same leadership of the UN and EU.
Nationalism in any good sense (not extremism) has been destroyed. National identity in the EU has been obliterated. Euro skepticism (against the EU and in favor of national sovereignty) has been targeted and every nation in the union has lost its identity. The UK is losing itself to absurd multiculturalism and Islamic extremism faced with a lax law and a sort of favoritism towards outsiders. The rest of Europe is being devoured by eastern nations who are more ruthless and aggressive then their western cousins, and all the while the leadership carelessly watches.
They know that when the uncontrolled social tensions they generate will eventually lead to a hard core "European" identity when the people feel empty of their own. Every host nation will become a sort of powerless state and the union, which is a mirror reflection of the UN, will take hold.
You cannot argue our national identity with a people willingly suppressing and erasing their own.
Originally posted by freedomSlave
I really don't give a crap about your constitution . Don't really feel sorry about people who get offended by people taking jabs at your country How many times have america or americans stuck their nose and business where it never belonged . Deal with it or people of your country can stfu on any international affairs .
Originally posted by DarthMuerte
reply to post by boymonkey74
I did. I also answered your question with information that took less than 1 second for google to locate. Our President is not a king, imperial ambitions of the last two occupants not withstanding. He cannot just change the law of the land at will. Unlike Europeans, correct me if I am wrong but I see no information to the contrary, we believe that our rights are not granted us by our government. Ultimate power and sovereignty resides not in the state, this includes our federal government, but in the people the citizens of our nation. THAT IS WHY WE HAVE THE SECOND AMENDMENT! We have the right to overthrow our government should the necessity arise. THe second amendment ensures we have the power to enforce that right.
Originally posted by MrInquisitive
Originally posted by DarthMuerte
reply to post by boymonkey74
I did. I also answered your question with information that took less than 1 second for google to locate. Our President is not a king, imperial ambitions of the last two occupants not withstanding. He cannot just change the law of the land at will. Unlike Europeans, correct me if I am wrong but I see no information to the contrary, we believe that our rights are not granted us by our government. Ultimate power and sovereignty resides not in the state, this includes our federal government, but in the people the citizens of our nation. THAT IS WHY WE HAVE THE SECOND AMENDMENT! We have the right to overthrow our government should the necessity arise. THe second amendment ensures we have the power to enforce that right.
How ironic that as an American you don't know what the 2nd amendment is about or for. Here is what it says:
"A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed."
The security of a free state, what is that? One that is not conquered or subject to the whims of another. And a well-regulated militia is needed for this. What is a well-regulated militia? Who would doing the regulating? I'd imagine some level of government would. This government-regulated militia is going to be used to overthrow the government? I don't think so. But let's say you're right and that is what it means, well the Confederate states tried this once and failed. You really think a bunch of Rambo wannabe with a few guns -- and I'll even throw in assault rifles -- are going to be overthrow the US government and all of its military and surveillance forces? Get serious.
And really the 2nd Amendment is an artifact because we have no well-regulated militia of citizenry. The National Guar, since WWI, has been used for foreign military adventures and no longer functions to protect the homeland. During hurricane Katrina there weren't enough N.G. helicopters for rescue operations because they were mostly over in Iraq killing Iraqis in order to get oil contracts for petroleum multinationals.
So no, don't buy your big, bad patriotic 2nd Amendment claims.edit on 17-12-2012 by MrInquisitive because: (no reason given)
You clearly have little understanding of the history of the Americas, or the British, or the Europeans.
Revisionist history is what is leading us all to a big fall.
The British did not send "wave after wave" of the best trained and equipped troops. In fact, what would be a good starting point find a copy of the Treaty of Paris, and have a read. It's a very important document that the Crown signed with the Colonies at the end of the so-called Revolutionary War... You'll find out some interesting facts about the "Special Relationship" that the US has with the UK.
Your suggestion that people are suppressing their national identities in the EU is also completely misguided. Ever been to Europe? I have... Germany, Holland, France - to name just three - and I can tell you for a solid fact that there are lots and lots of people over there, who are deeply proud of who they are, where they come from, and what they want to be. I have met few who want to be "European"...
But, it's a shame real research and facts are cast aside in favor of spouting off and espousing what a dictatorial revisionist Government wants you to believe....
I don't think you are stupid at all.
I do, however, think you have something of a blind spot when it comes to cherry picking! "This bit is good, we will use that - but we don't like that bit so ignore that".
Mind you, you could argue that is rather clever in itself.