It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by ProtoplasmicTraveler
reply to post by Logarock
Not really a civil war but forces supported, for political ends, by Syria and Iran trying to just take over the country. This was no home grown civil war. In fact the orders to blow up the hotel were given from Tehran and at the time Iran had a contengent of RG in country....as they still do...training what is now known as Hezbollah....run right out of Iran not Lebanon.
One of my clients later in the civil war in Lebanon was President Gameyels mother who was living in Los Angeles. He was the Christian President of Lebanon and she sure seemed to think it was a civil war too.
He was later assissinated by the way.
12"Here is a simple, rule-of-thumb guide for behavior: Ask yourself what you want people to do for you, then grab the initiative and do it for them. Add up God's Law and Prophets and this is what you get.
31And as you would like and desire that men would do to you, do exactly so to them......35But love your enemies and be kind and do good.
Yes I am very aware of that. But really a civil war that amounted in the end to folks posturing themselves according to the position of outside powers or needing stamped by them is realy not a civil war in the end. Take Gameyel as a case in point. Assad runs that country. Iran runs that country. In their jealousy of what Lebanon had become and their hate for the west and any Christain influence in the area....they destroyed it and they set on it now like a roosting hen.
Originally posted by TheNewKid
If he does go ahead then I guess it's
(Leviticus 24:19–21, Exodus 21:22–25, and Deuteronomy 19:21)
"an eye for an eye",
Originally posted by ProtoplasmicTraveler
Petraeus: Burning Quran Endangers Troops
Originally posted by Logarock
reply to post by ProtoplasmicTraveler
Traveler, there must be more to this than a simple bunch of idots burrning books. It fits to many bills. Looks staged. Like "how convenient" can it get.
As a christian I find the burning of another religions Holy book highly offensive.
Originally posted by hadriana
The idea of 'the shouldn't protest something because it is dangerous' is highly offensive to me. More so than burning the Koran.
Originally posted by Fromabove
When this act of burning is done, Those who are Jihad will come out of the woodwork in large numbers and fight the infidels as they see the rest of the non believing world for defying their god. Like flies to honey. Then I guess it will be known what the true intent of the Islamic world is. Is he provoking them, yes, but it's not about book burning as much as it is getting the world war started early rather than late before Iran is fully armed with Nukes. Because in the end, what they want is the world under Islamic rule.
Originally posted by john_bmth
Again, how on earth can you make such broad and sweeping statements about 30% of the world's population? Do you really think that by burning the Koran, 30% of the world's population are suddenly going to rise up as a single unit and invade the "West"? Absolute insanity.