Thought this was an interesting watch, just pay attention to the way this woman speaks.
I understand that there are legal procedures which need to be followed, but this woman fails to even address simple questions about the 'normality'
of the situation. This almost looks like a failed attempt at a smear campaign, I don't think this achieved its intended objective and I don't think
they have anyone really fooled by all this.
But, "The charges are made and then withdrawn and the damage is done."
According to some, this is the best way to deal with them:
WikiLeaks should be hit with the cyber equivalent of napalm. Let's have that fire sale. Burn, baby, burn.
1
Knew it was a setup the minute I heard it, what a crock. Now, who will be punished for this? Who will source the culprit? My guess is nobody, what’s
yours.
gotta love al jazeera, the only news outlet i watch, as it is at least a "little bit" more honest and neutral in its reporting compared to CNN, BBC,
Etc
That was a classic interview...now it's "sexual molestation"...what a joke...no one buys any of this...it IS an obvious attempt of character
defamation, no doubt about it.
I have to laugh at all the americans that can't distinguish between Sweden and Switzerland simply because of the similar name..
I went to FOX to read the conservative reactions to Sweden having Wikileaks servers, every 10th comment got Sweden and Switzerland mixed up and every
5th comment wanted to send spec op teams or bomb us into the stone age.
How are you gonna mix up two countries when you've just finished reading an article that mentions the specific country several times? Oh, I forgot..
most people only read the headlines.
I don't know if you're an american CynicalM but I had to write that since you mentioned the swiss and reminded me of those comments.
ofcourse its a smear / honeypot trap gone sour,...
swedish law 1 0 1
if your detained in your absence or have a warranty after you in absence they dont name the perpetrator in that warrant , since its not yet public
material , its an on going investigation on a sensitive subject where usualy even the court has its doors closed meaning its not even for the public
to follow. its after the judges verdict that the case is made public or not for x ammount of time.
so who and how did they knew it was J A who was the perp.
did the police leak
did the females in question go directly to the tabloid paper who broke the news after they went to consult the "city police" who on their behalf had
to do an investigation even if they didnt file a complaint
did the prosecutor fail to protect the identities of all involved ?
or did all 3 work on the behalf of someone else ?
you think and you speculate , i for one have even more reasons as to why not go back to sweden and enjoy their life of ignorance.