It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by gwydionblack
Wow... just wow.
If this is true, really, this is it. The vote of the people is more worthless now than it ever has been.
I'm speechless.
Originally posted by Tgautier13
The lines in the sand have been drawn. Don't think for a second that the MA race had nothing to do with this decision. With sudden rise in popularity of the independent movement the capitalists had to try and find some way to maintain their hegemony.
Originally posted by marg6043
reply to post by TheRedneck
The problem with that is you know the old say, money talks BS walk meaning a regular tax payer (mostly broke this days) can never comepete with the corporation free speeches pay by million dollars campaigns.
So now in America if you have money then you can buy yourself some air free speech.
Im sure most Americans can not afford to buy million dollar air space to show their freedom of speech this days promoting for their favorite candidate.
That means only those that can get a million dollar sponsor can get a good shot at poltics
look...it doesn't matter who gets elected...they will never side with a person harmed by a corporation or company....because...that company or corporation will tell that candidate that they will flood the airways with negative political adveritizing against him at the next election
[edit on 21-1-2010 by marg6043]
Originally posted by concernedcitizan
Actually this makes perfect sense. A good majority of Americans already let Corporations decide what they are going to eat, drink, wear, watch, ad nauseum, ad infinitum. If it wasn't for Corporations and the military industrial complex I wouldn't have this computer in front of me to spew my inane chatter. For all the good Corporations have done for us this is the least we can do. Next up, let's give them the right to vote.
Originally posted by jimmyx
reply to post by maybereal11
are you kidding me....then these people don't know their donkey from a hole in the ground...they stuck it to obama and the demos and are nothing but 2-bit whiners who don't have a clue to the big picture
[edit on 21-1-2010 by jimmyx]
House Republican Leader John Boehner of Ohio called the decision "a big win for the First Amendment" as long as donors disclose every dollar they spend on campaigns.
"Let the American people decide how much money is enough," he said
Boehner hands out 'tobacco checks' on floor of House
In late June of 1995 then-GOP Conference Chairman John Boehner handed out "about a half-dozen" checks from the political action committee of tobacco company Brown & Williamson Corp. to fellow Republicans on the floor of the House.
Boehner's chief of staff Barry Jackson stated, "We were trying to help guys who needed to get their June 30th numbers up, their cash-on-hand numbers up. All leadership does this. We have to raise money for people and help them raise money."
Boehner was forced to stop handing out the checks when two freshmen Republicans, "appalled by it," confronted him and voiced their displeasure.
President Obama swiftly blasted the court's decision, calling on Congress to devise a "forceful response" as quickly as possible.
"The Supreme Court has given a green light to a new stampede of special interest money in our politics," Obama said in a statement. "It is a major victory for big oil, Wall Street banks, health insurance companies and the other powerful interests that marshal their power every day in Washington to drown out the voices of everyday Americans."
Originally posted by maybereal11
Originally posted by jimmyx
reply to post by maybereal11
are you kidding me....then these people don't know their donkey from a hole in the ground...they stuck it to obama and the demos and are nothing but 2-bit whiners who don't have a clue to the big picture
[edit on 21-1-2010 by jimmyx]
Mass was all about...."We are still looking for change"...not...lets back the GOP agenda.
Originally posted by concernedcitizan
reply to post by maybereal11
A Dem/Rep vote is still a vote for the status quo. I would have been more impressed if they would have voted in a Libertarian or even a commie. THAT would be a vote for change. Meet the new boss, same as the old boss. And meanwhile, Rome burns.