It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by MarkLuitzen
. . . .
People forget that those people in Gitmo are taken from area's as Iraq and Afghanistan and were taken alive after they attacked our soldiers , we know they are guilty.. and it is that we have international law that we have to take them alive and put them before court and judge them.
. . . .
If it was up to me we should not take prisoners of war just shoot to kill and leave non alive .. max force with as less civilian casualty.
We don't want to create martyrs and free publicity by taking the to places as gitmo .. gitmo can only be closed if we start taking the afghanistan war and the war on terror seriously ..
. . .
if being fired apon just blow up the building and if terrorist are stil alive after that and you control if they are stil alive you should be human and shoot them . . . .
Originally posted by JJay55
If you have nothing to hide then what's the problem? I say do cavity inspections on every single person this guy came in contact with
Originally posted by mmiichael
Originally posted by EvolvedMinistry
You really shouldn't be making personal attacks.
We've all had to endure your constant stream of incoherent vicious attacks on Christians, Jews, the West, media, and the usual targets dopey brainwashed self-styled freedom lovers want to find fault with with.
Then we further have to endure embarrassing asskissing apologies and explanations for paranoid destructive philosophies and their minion of psychos trying to murder ordinary people for some vague unnamed revenge or anger motive.
Who exactly was that 23 year old rich Nigerian kid going to liberate by blowing up traveling Christians on Christmas and if he'd succeeded some Muslims in urban Detroit.
There's a reason the Muslim world does not receive the respect it so desperately craves.
I'm sure an incomprehensible rant will follow as a reply to this.
Some things are predictable.
[edit on 28-12-2009 by mmiichael]
You've endured nothing...but thanks for playing. As far as a rant is concerned, you're doing quite well yourself...Pats on the back for you.
I think JJay has done far more to upset people on this thread than I ever have in all the threads that I have posted combined. If you consider yourself offended, then that would make three collective posters on here against me vs JJay's 10+. So, who's the bad guy??? Me for presenting another view, or you for picking up a battle that's not yours? Sorry you don't like alternative view points, but, that's what ATS is for. Go back and read the terms and conditions.
And consequently, people like yourself is what makes Christianity difficult to stomach or respect. There have been equally as many acts of terrorism due to Christianity as there have been with Islamic radical fundamentalists, and, unless you want to be embarrassed by tons of evidence to show this, it would be good for you to let this go.
And I've had to hear so much racism spouted by people of your breed that its really getting out of control. Are you Christian??? Are you tolerant??? If so, you definitely would not have even replied to my message. As I have stated before, I don't mind REAL CHRISTIANS...YOU KNOW, THE TYPE THAT FOLLOW THE 10 COMMANDMENTS. Thou shalt not kill, and Jesus's statement, "Turn the other cheek." Thanks for illuminating your true nature because I can tell these are not principles that you are familiar with. As far as personal attacks??? What is it that you're calling your statement against me??? Or is that just the Christian way??? HMMMMM...And, if I'm not mistaken, no one rattled your cage or even cared whether you were there or not. You chose to put yourself in this, so, WELCOME to the discussion little man...or woman, or boy...or girl.
[edit on 28-12-2009 by EvolvedMinistry]
Originally posted by Kailassa
Originally posted by MarkLuitzen
. . . .
I guess you are not old enough to remember the invasion of the Netherlands.
The Dutch resistance were terrorists then, in the eyes of the German invaders.
Did your Omas and Opas aid the resistance, did they keep their heads down in fear, or did they dob in their neighbours for extra rations?
Holland was guilty of siding with the English against Germany. This made them a far more legitimate enemy of Germany than America's buddy Iraq ever was of the US.
Were the members of the resistance in the Netherlands, France and Austria evil terrorists who you wish had been shot on sight?
Mark, stop being blinded by the aggressor's propaganda, their burning Reichstags. They are mass murderers, slyly creating civil wars to weaken countries so they can freely steal their resources.
Do you really want to support the evil done by the "new Germany"?
Beautifully stated...If I had the power to give you applause, I certainly would. I guess a star will have to do.
Originally posted by earthdude
How hard is it to explode a bomb? I think this guy decided he did not want to die but would make a show to save face. Either that or he is another false flag terrorist.
Originally posted by dgtempe
LATEST BREAKING:
AL QAIDA CLAIMS RESPONSIBILITY.
Originally posted by EvolvedMinistry
Of course they did...I mean, if the MSM says so, then it MUST be true. Precisely the way Colin Powell said that there were definitely biological agents and other such devices of weaponry in Iraq. Oh, and there was that other thing..."Al Qaeda in Iraq," even though Iraqis and Afghanis have been mortal enemies since the beginning of time.
Originally posted by mmiichael
Originally posted by marsvolta
so all people speaking in defense of, say, Hitler must be mental? cant they have other possible reasons? he used to be God in the eyes of some of his contrymen back in his days. some of our politicians are too in the eyes of our own countrymen who elected them...who`s to say they wont be deemed evil later in history? oh the propaganda machine of the west. many so called terrorist organizations might be fighting for the cause that`s good in their eyes. unless we hear straight form the mouth of the horse we dont know.
(i hope i wont get arrested for voicing my opinion)
Too complex for you to comprehend I expect - discussing Hitler in a positive light or something similar is not a problem. Advocating, encouraging, approving the systematic murder of innocent people is when you cross the line.
What amazes me on threads like this is the contortions people go through avoiding the fact that this guy was trying to murder as many people as he could.
Originally posted by Night Watchman
Originally posted by EvolvedMinistry
Of course they did...I mean, if the MSM says so, then it MUST be true. Precisely the way Colin Powell said that there were definitely biological agents and other such devices of weaponry in Iraq. Oh, and there was that other thing..."Al Qaeda in Iraq," even though Iraqis and Afghanis have been mortal enemies since the beginning of time.
Yet another mish mash of incoherent thought.
Let's attempt to make sense of the incomprehensible, shall we. I have a few questions:
1) What constitutes the "MSM," in your mind? All media outlets? If not, which ones are and are not?
2) What does Colin Powell's statements with regard to WMD in Iraq have to so with the MSM?
3) How does the relationship between Iraq and Afghanistan preclude the validity of Al Qaeda in Iraq?
4) Could you explain why you believe that Iraq and Afghanistan have been mortal enemies "since the beginning of time?"
Originally posted by EvolvedMinistry
Last question:
If you don't know this one, then you're more hopeless than I could have EVER imagined. Look at the background history between Afghanistan and Iraq. Study it...the only time those two countries even somewhat got along was during the IRANIAN REVOLUTION IN THE LATE 70'S. This is the very reason that I told you that unless you had a master's degree in middle eastern studies that you should BACK OFF.
[edit on 28-12-2009 by EvolvedMinistry]
Originally posted by EvolvedMinistry
Originally posted by dgtempe
LATEST BREAKING:
AL QAIDA CLAIMS RESPONSIBILITY.
Of course they did...I mean, if the MSM says so, then it MUST be true. Precisely the way Colin Powell said that there were definitely biological agents and other such devices of weaponry in Iraq. Oh, and there was that other thing..."Al Qaeda in Iraq," even though Iraqis and Afghanis have been mortal enemies since the beginning of time.
I’m the first of many, warns airline ‘bomber’ Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab
A global search for accomplices in the Detroit airliner plot was under way yesterday after an al-Qaeda group based in Yemen claimed responsibility for the operation and the would-be bomber was reported to have said that more attacks were being planned.
www.timesonline.co.uk...
Parents of Suspect Offer Help
The parents of the suspect in the Christmas Day airliner bombing attempt issued a statement on Monday saying that they had been trying for two months to determine the whereabouts of their son and were prepared to help the authorities investigate.
“Our family, like the rest of the world, were woken up in the early hours of Saturday, 26th December, 2009 to the news of an attempt to blow up a plane by a young Nigerian man,” the statement said.
“The family will continue to fully cooperate with local and international security agencies towards the investigation of this matter, while we await results of the full investigation,” the family said in its statement. “We, along with the whole world, are thankful to almighty God that there were no lives lost in the incident.”
www.nytimes.com...
President Obama warned Monday that the United States would respond aggressively to terrorism such as last week's botched attempt to blow up a U.S. airliner.