It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by curious_soul
Originally posted by jthomas
Originally posted by curious_soul
Please everyone who may have a question concerning 911 stop acknowledging the people that use the word "truther". Using the word "truther" does not stregthen their arguement and it's a lame attempt at belittlement.
Too bad that ""Truthers" call themselves "Truthers." Actually, I prefer using the correct term: "9/11 Deniers."
And what about your term: "official story believer?"
You must be new at this.
No, i'm not new at this and you constantly being cute about the facts of 3,000 people who were murdered is repugnant.
There is a truth movement and the MSM came up with the word "truthers" to describe them. I don't think i've seen one person use the term "OS believer." The term OS, yes.
Originally posted by all4freedom
I don't know what happened on that day but I do know that the "official story" isn't the whole truth. If you believe what your told by the government then I have a bridge to sell you as well.
Originally posted by EarthCitizen07
While I initially found the planted explosives theory hard to swallow, I now believe there is a lot of merit to it. Yes 2 planes crashed into the towers but it probably would not be enough to bring them down, especially with the fire retardant coating each floor had, so to be absolutely sure they went with explosives.
But how come nobody saw them plant explosives; No office workers during the day or late night cleaning crews? Were they paid to keep silent?
Its all very confusing and I am sure the government wanted it that way.
Much like the plane that flew over the pentagon before a missle struck it.
Originally posted by jthomas
What's funny about you 9/11 "Truthers" is you actually fall for the above nonsense that you were told and now believe it comes from your "gut instinct."
Debunkers don't have to do a thing except chuckle and shake their heads in amazement that 9/11 "Truthers" will believe anything other "Truthers" tell them like you did above.
Originally posted by Roid_Rage27
reply to post by jthomas
jthomas, Bonez threw back at you EXACTLY what you did to the TS. Don't try to spin what you did holds any water. The fact is you believe the OS because you choose to.
Truthers don't believe it because logically, scientifically and rationally it does not make sense.
The truth is, many people from all walks of life don't believe it from local and foreign government reps, scientists, researchers, pilots, and architects just to name a few. Oh and celebrities too! (sarcasm).
To call Truther's ignorant is pretty foolish.
People that are vastly superior to you in terms of credibility regarding just the pure physics and science of the whole event are calling the OS impossible.
You're jthomas on ATS. It's you vs. them. Who do you think wins that debate?
Originally posted by AceWombat04
We. Don't. Know.
Originally posted by GoldenFleece
Originally posted by RipCurl
Minimal? nearly all the floors within WTC 7 was on fire. As described by several firefighters on scene, they called the building Fully engulfed in fire.
Yeah, here's the north face of WTC 7, with "nearly all the floors on fire" (ONE floor that appears to have been set):
In contrast, here's a high-rise fire in Madrid, Spain that burned for 10 hours and never collapsed:
As a matter of fact, no steel-framed high-rise building in history has ever collapsed due to fire.
So much for your honesty and credibility.