It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by easynow
strange that only that area looks the way it does...the rest of the photo does not show objects like these.
Originally posted by chapter29
reply to post by feydrautha
What makes it a prank guy?
If you don't see anything in the pictures then you don't see anything...the OP went out of their way to explain in detail, to include pictures and many colorful arrows, what they see in those.
So due diligence was done, whether you agree or not...pictures are the most likely evidence we will uncover for now....
Tone it down man...or I might go get Paul to stick another dagger through your mandible...
sorry folks there is nothing to see here, move along.
Again heres another set of pics that dont show anything other than blurry incongruous "somethings". In this latest easynow extravaganza I dont see a single object that looks like it is a structure of ANY kind. I am beginning to think that easynows imagination is getting the better of him/her ( Im not sure as of the wrinting of this post and dont really care either way). So again..blurry images of so called Martian landscapes= B O G U S!
Originally posted by Nohup
Originally posted by easynow
strange that only that area looks the way it does...the rest of the photo does not show objects like these.
That's simply not true. The full image, found on the Malin site, shows that this is just a small rippled area that is flanked on either side by other rippled areas that look a lot like this one. Here's the context of your "city," and rotated so that it's north side up:
How is it that your little blurry spot is somehow a city ("A"), while "B" and "C" are not? Come on, man. Get real.
Originally posted by easynow
Nohup you missed the point i was trying to make...
the area around the city looks different...
[...]
see what i mean now ?
Originally posted by sllapur
I wouldn't trust the opinion on anything except their age of anyone who says they can't see a single structure resembling artificial edification.
Originally posted by Nohup
Originally posted by sllapur
I wouldn't trust the opinion on anything except their age of anyone who says they can't see a single structure resembling artificial edification.
As I have said before, though, geometrical doesn't equal artificial. Craters are very round, and erosion from all different kinds of processes create straight lines, angles, and so on. The challenge will always be to prove that they were created by some kind of intelligent folks, and not by Mother or Father Nature. And, "It's obvious!" is not really a good argument for that.