It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
As a result, scientists discovered 2006 was not the warmest year in U.S. history. In fact, 1934 was the warmest year, and 2006 fell to a distant fourth. Only four of the top 11 warmest years have occurred since 1954, according to the corrected data.
Originally posted by Stormdancer777
As a result, scientists discovered 2006 was not the warmest year in U.S. history. In fact, 1934 was the warmest year, and 2006 fell to a distant fourth. Only four of the top 11 warmest years have occurred since 1954, according to the corrected data.
U.S. temperature data compiled and reported by NASA since 2000 contained errors that caused the organization to falsely claim a number of recent years were the hottest or among the hottest on record, scientists have discovered.
In comparing temperatures of years separated by 60 or 70 years the uncertainties in various adjustments (urban warming, station history adjustments, etc.) lead to an uncertainty of at least 0.1°C. Thus it is not possible to declare a record U.S. temperature with confidence until a result is obtained that exceeds the temperature of 1934 by more than 0.1°C.
This is precisely how the 'hockey stick' purporting to rewrite history--erasing the Medieval Warm Period and subsequent Little Ice Age--was debunked, and indeed by the very same person--McIntyre," said Chris Horner, a senior fellow at the Competitive Enterprise Institute.
Also, what if we are still coming out of the last ice age?
Originally posted by melatonin
This is the scientific way. Present hypotheses, test them against the evidence. Those which conform to the evidence win the day. Others lose. But there is no shame, we need this competition of ideas.
Originally posted by apc
Yet anyone who presents an alternative hypothesis is a dishonest right-wing retarded binary thinking BS blog author...
Gotta love it.
Of course, lost upon Hansen - and, quite frankly, the entire global warming alarmism crowd - is that if oceans were indeed so much higher three million years ago before man was emitting so much carbon dioxide, it seems quite specious to suggest that man is responsible for today's warming and sea level rise.
They say this, and then fail to show that NASA made any such claims,
ocean full of giant pipes that pump up cold, nutrient-rich water from deep below, encouraging surface algae to bloom and suck carbon dioxide from the atmosphere.
But other experts are skeptical, pointing out that the scheme could release more carbon than it absorbs while putting fragile marine life in danger. (Related: "Plan to Dump Iron in Ocean as Climate Fix Attracts Debate" [July 25, 2007].)
Best to spend money on new energy technologies and preparation for future effects.
Growing inside the caves of the tropical Pacific island of Borneo are some of the keys to understanding how the Earth's climate suddenly changed - several times - over the last 25,000 years. By analyzing stalagmites, the pilar-like rock formations that stem from the ground in caves, they were able to produce a high-resolution and continuous record of the climate over this equatorial rainforest.
Cave Records Provide Clues To Climate Change
When Georgia Tech Assistant Professor Kim Cobb and graduate student Jud Partin wanted to understand the mechanisms that drove the abrupt climate change events that occurred thousands of years ago, they didn't drill for ice cores from the glaciers of Greenland or the icy plains of Antarctica, as is customary for paleoclimatolgists. Instead, they went underground.
For example, Partin and Cobb's records suggest that the tropical Pacific began drying about 20,000 years ago and that this trend may have pre-conditioned the North Atlantic for an abrupt climate change event that occurred about 16,500 years ago, known as the Heinrich 1 event.
"In addition, the Borneo records indicate that the tropical Pacific began to get wetter before the North Atlantic recovered from the Heinrich 1 event 14,000 years ago. Perhaps the tropical Pacific is again driving that trend," said Partin.
Originally posted by melatonin
I have no institutional access for some reason tonight, so I can't read the original article
They should sort it out soon. I'll post again when I've actually read the article.
Letter
Nature 449, 452-455 (27 September 2007) | doi:10.1038/nature06164; Received 22 February 2007; Accepted 8 August 2007
Millennial-scale trends in west Pacific warm pool hydrology since the Last Glacial Maximum
Judson W. Partin1, Kim M. Cobb1, Jess F. Adkins2, Brian Clark3 & Diego P. Fernandez2
School of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30332, USA
Division of Geological and Planetary Sciences, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California 91125, USA
Gunung Mulu National Park, Sarawak, Malaysia
Correspondence to: Judson W. Partin1 Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to J.W.P. (Email: [email protected]).
Abstract
Models and palaeoclimate data suggest that the tropical Pacific climate system plays a key part in the mechanisms underlying orbital-scale and abrupt climate change1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7. Atmospheric convection over the western tropical Pacific is a major source of heat and moisture to extratropical regions, and may therefore influence the global climate response to a variety of forcing factors. The response of tropical Pacific convection to changes in global climate boundary conditions, abrupt climate changes and radiative forcing remains uncertain, however. Here we present three absolutely dated oxygen isotope records from stalagmites in northern Borneo that reflect changes in west Pacific warm pool hydrology over the past 27,000 years. Our results suggest that convection over the western tropical Pacific weakened 18,000–20,000 years ago, as tropical Pacific2, 5, 6, 8 and Antarctic9 temperatures began to rise during the early stages of deglaciation. Convective activity, as inferred from oxygen isotopes, reached a minimum during Heinrich event 1 (ref. 10), when the Atlantic meridional overturning circulation was weak11, pointing to feedbacks between the strength of the overturning circulation and tropical Pacific hydrology. There is no evidence of the Younger Dryas event12 in the stalagmite records, however, suggesting that different mechanisms operated during these two abrupt deglacial climate events. During the Holocene epoch, convective activity appears to track changes in spring and autumn insolation, highlighting the sensitivity of tropical Pacific convection to external radiative forcing. Together, these findings demonstrate that the tropical Pacific hydrological cycle is sensitive to high-latitude climate processes in both hemispheres, as well as to external radiative forcing, and that it may have a central role in abrupt climate change events.
This study demonstrates that the tropical Pacific hydrological cycle is sensitive to high-latitude climate processes in both hemispheres as well as to external radiative forcing. However, the relatively smooth character of the warm pool's hydrological variability over the past 27,000 yr suggests a limited potential for large, abrupt changes in the character of tropical Pacific variability. Nonetheless, by gradually altering the heat and salt budgets of the global oceans, the tropical Pacific may have a pivotal role in driving thermohaline circulation changes associated with abrupt climate change events. Whether the tropical Pacific coupled system acts as an amplifier or a trigger of internal global climate variability, its feedbacks on the global climate system must be an integral part of any climate change mechanism, natural or anthropogenic.
Thus, changes elsewhere, whether from internal changes or external forcing (solar etc), generally initiate changes in the cycle in this area, which then feedbacks to other areas of the globe. So, in essence, it's an important part of the mechanism of global climate change.
Originally posted by Stormdancer777
I am no climatologist either, but I have been looking for, and keeping up on the latest, for some reason I find this fascinating.
A core from the ocean nearby supports the finding. Not only did the temperature not drop in the Southern Hemisphere during the dramatic freeze in Europe, it actually increased, and to significantly warmer temperatures than we experience today - at least 2 degrees warmer. It has been steadily cooling ever since.
"It was thought that climate change was always global, but our research shows that is not necessarily the case, in fact what happens in the north can be the opposite of what happens in the south. So if the Greenland Ice Sheet does melt because of global warming, triggering another ice age, Australia and New Zealand are the places to be," Dr Barrows said.
Originally posted by Stormdancer777
1988 huh?
That's an interesting year, why that year?
Kent school governor Stewart Dimmock claimed the film was unfit for schools as it was politically partisan, containing serious scientific inaccuracies and 'sentimental mush'.Lorry driver and member of the political group, the New Party, Mr Dimmock had sought a court order to ban the documentary after the Government decided to distribute the documentary and four short films to 3,500 schools in February.