It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: MapMistress
originally posted by: elementalgrove
a reply to: IAMTAT
It is mindboggling how the followers of the cult of covid will ignore all of this.
Dear leader Fauci is the only one who can give them counsel, he says this is dangerous and our freedoms must be taken in order to protect his flock.
Soon they will be calling for camps.
That's a scary news post. Almost like they are calling everyone who refuses to get the vaccine "terrorists".
Did they fail to check who is refusing the vaccine? Cause here in Phoenix the majority of cops, firefighters and paramedics are refusing the vaccine. That's like calling all the cops, firefighters and paramedics "terrorists".
It is an important message given the vaccine hesitancy that exists in law enforcement. As of August 11, 34% of the roughly 4,000 Phoenix Police Department employees have reported to the city that they are vaccinated.
A city spokesperson also telling ABC15 that 21% of the employees have already been infected with the virus.
...
Phoenix firefighters and paramedics have an even lower reported vaccination rate, with just 31% telling the city they had gotten the shot(s).
Also, even more fire employees already have antibodies, with 31% having already recovered from the virus.
MCSO, meanwhile, estimates that 37% of their deputies are vaccinated and reports 25% have already had the virus.
Cops, Firefighters, Paramedics Vaccination Rates
So that's 66% of Phoenix cops refusing the vaccine and 69% of firefighters and paramedics refusing the vaccine and an additional 63% of Maricopa County cops (MCSO) refusing the vaccine.
What dumb network is claiming that those refusing COVID vaccines are "terrorists"?
The phenomena of cops, firefighters and paramedics refusing the vaccine is nationwide, not just Phoenix.
NBC nightly news interview with Dr. Wu Zunyou from the Chinese Center for Disease Control admits on camera to NBC that the COVID-19 virus has never been isolate
This interview?
The interview on NBC has been scrubbed.
originally posted by: Nexttimemaybe
The vaccine was always about the severity of the illness if you caught vivid.
Reducing how I'll and for how long. This helps reduce the spread if the catchee has a reduced active virus period.
So it's working as intended.
Very similar to flu shots, although almost double the effectiveness of the flu shot.
originally posted by: beyondknowledge
a reply to: slatesteam
I think this is slow motion video of the projectile leaving the barrel. Still waiting on the super and ultra slow motion video though.
Id also argue they knew there was no “emergency” and their were other possible treatments, which would disqualify it for EUA
originally posted by: IAMTAT
The document, posted on the FDA website, is titled, “Vaccines and Related Biological Products; Advisory Committee Meeting; FDA Briefing Document Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine.” [1]
It is dated December 10, 2020. The date tells us that all the information in the document is taken from the Pfizer clinical trial, based on which the FDA authorized the vaccine for public use.
A key quote is buried on page 42: “Among 3410 total cases of suspected but unconfirmed COVID-19 in the overall study population, 1594 occurred in the vaccine group vs. 1816 in the placebo group [who received a saltwater shot].”
Those shocking numbers have never seen the light of day in news media.
The comparative numbers reveal that the vaccine was not effective at preventing COVID-19. It was certainly not 50% more effective than a placebo shot—the standard for FDA Emergency Use Authorization.
So...clinical trial results showed that:
"1594 [cases] occurred in the vaccine group"
"1816 [cases] occurred in the placebo group"
However, according to the article, vaccines MUST prove to be at least 50% or MORE effective than a placebo in order to receive Emergency Use Authorization from the FDA.
The above Pfizer CT results do not indicate this benchmark was reached.
AND...
The FDA document also states: “Suspected COVID-19 cases that occurred within 7 days after any vaccination were 409 in the vaccine group vs. 287 in the placebo group.”
That’s explosive. Right after vaccination, 409 people who received the shots became “suspected COVID cases.” This alone should have been enough to stop the clinical trial altogether. But it wasn’t.
PDF: www.fda.gov...
blog.nomorefakenews.com...
(emphasis mine)
According to the Pfizer clinical trial, upon which the FDA authorized the vaccine for emergency public use...a very large percentage of test subjects became China Virus POSITIVE AFTER receiving the "vaccine" (NOT 50% more effective than placebo)...and this, alone, should've been enough to stop the clinical trial...and prevent any Emergency Use Authorization for the Pfizer China Virus "vaccine".
To explain this and keep the trial afloat to gain it's EUA...the Pfizer trial posits:
It is possible that the imbalance in suspected COVID-19 cases occurring in the 7 days post vaccination represents vaccine reactogenicity with symptoms that overlap with those of COVID-19. Overall though, these data do not raise a concern that protocol-specified reporting of suspected, but unconfirmed COVID-19 cases could have masked clinically significant adverse events that would not have otherwise been detected.
www.fda.gov...
Pfizer is just covering their ass here by essentially saying:
Well, actually we can't really be sure if we were testing actual China Virus cases to begin with...which could mean that maybe our CT was flawed...but also, maybe not...but we're not concerned about that so you shouldn't be either...so go ahead and give us Emergency Use Authorization anyway--You know you want to."
Of course this is smoke and mirrors...and, as the article goes on to explain:
What does “suspected cases” mean?
It can only mean these people all displayed symptoms consistent with the definition of COVID-19, but they’re unconfirmed cases because…their PCR tests were negative, not positive.
However, if their tests were negative, why would they be called “suspected cases” instead of “NOT CASES”?
Something is wrong here. The FDA is hedging its bets, muddying the waters, obscuring facts.
By FDA/CDC rules, a case of COVID-19 means: a person has tested positive, period.
That’s the way cases are counted.
It's apparent that the Pfizer clinical trial buried and excused the fact that the "vaccine" was NOT at least 50% more effective than a placebo at preventing China Virus infection...in order to receive it's EUA from an FDA that really wanted to grant it anyway.
Both Pfizer and the FDA KNEW the "vaccine" was NOT effective enough for Emergency Use Authorization.
But it was granted anyway....so here we are.
He’s hedging, when you take a position like this you can never be wrong. He might as well have said nothing.
originally posted by: elementalgrove
a reply to: Phage
Your source did not open for me, here is one that seems to disagree with your assessment.
Flu disappeared for more than a year!?
As Scientific American reported in November 2020, the drop-off in flu numbers following COVID’s arrival was swift and global. Since then, cases have stayed remarkably low. “There’s just no flu circulating,” says Greg Poland, who has studied the disease at the Mayo Clinic for decades. The U.S. saw about 700 deaths from influenza during the 2020–2021 season. In comparison, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention estimates there were approximately 22,000 U.S. deaths in the prior season and 34,000 deaths two seasons ago.
But it wouldn't be surprising that the mitigation measures taken against COVID would have an effect on influenza as well.
How do you explain the mitigation not extending to the super scary rona and its new terrifying variants?
And let me get this straight, on one hand you say it did not drop, than on the other you say it dropped because of the draconian covid restrictions??
They are sophisticated, it should be ok.
originally posted by: SeaWorthy
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: SeaWorthy
It really reduced all the people like this guy
Sad, yes. But far fewer of those who are vaccinated are being hospitalized and/or dying.
Do you want me to post stories from people who regret not being vaccinated now?
Why do you think that the people who know the most attend parties without masks and don't social distance?
WHY are they never and have been NEVER afraid of this flu even from day one?
I got double vaxxed lol, I’m wondering if I need to get these boosters for life now or can I opt out at anytime. I have a great deal of regret.
originally posted by: marg6043
a reply to: Uknownparadox
They are now brining the covid booster for life addiction and dependency, soo get ready roll them sleeves and take it like a slave, because in never going to end.
Meanwhile some has spotted all the brand new billionaires getting ready to become trillionaires, thanks to covid and the booster addiction.
Capitalism is soo good when certain groups can manipulate the masses.
No it wasn't always about the severity. The reason people got it is because they were told they wouldn't get covid.
Moderna said in December it had submitted data to the US Food and Drug Administration showing its vaccine prevented 2/3 of all infections, including asymptomatic infections. For now, the CDC recommends that people not assume they are completely immune to infection after having been vaccinated.
originally posted by: Bluenose13
This is a 6 month clinical trial on the Pfizer shot. My understanding is that it is the largest, most thorough study on one of these vaccines that we have yet. If you look at the supplementary PDF, on page 15, you will find a table on "Vaccine Efficacy against Severe COVID-19 Occurrence after Dose 1". This is where the relative risk of the vaccinated portion was 96.7% lower than the unvaccinated. For the actual numbers, there was 1 case out of 22,505 vaccinated. There were 30 cases out of 22,435 unvaccinated.
With a Vaccine, you had a 1/22505 chance of getting severe covid. 0.004%.
originally posted by: Phage
Here is what CNN said in January:
Moderna said in December it had submitted data to the US Food and Drug Administration showing its vaccine prevented 2/3 of all infections, including asymptomatic infections. For now, the CDC recommends that people not assume they are completely immune to infection after having been vaccinated.
originally posted by: macaronicaesar
I got double vaxxed lol, I’m wondering if I need to get these boosters for life now or can I opt out at anytime. I have a great deal of regret.
never had a flu shot in my life. It’s not worth the effort for its 50% success rate. I’d rather roll the dice on not catching it.
originally posted by: Xtrozero
originally posted by: macaronicaesar
I got double vaxxed lol, I’m wondering if I need to get these boosters for life now or can I opt out at anytime. I have a great deal of regret.
They are suggesting the old and high risk get boosters which were like 80%+ of those that died...
So are you like 70 or have one foot in the grave? If not I wouldn't worry about it too much. BTW did you ever get a yearly booster shot for the flu, or if not, ever really have it a second thought either way? Why is this different?
These RNA base viruses mutate like crazy, so what do you want them to do? The interesting part is mRNA is based around a protein that should be there with other variants, so the body should react on variants too. Smallpox is DNA based and has had 2 variants in the last 30,000 years and here they are talking like 10+ a year with COVID.
originally posted by: macaronicaesar
I also argue they knew there was no “emergency” and their were other possible treatments, which would disqualify it for EUA
originally posted by: macaronicaesar
It’s not worth the effort for its 50% success rate. I’d rather roll the dice on not catching it.