FDA Knew and Hid Fact There'd Be Many COVID Cases in Fully "Vaccinated"

The document, posted on the FDA website, is titled, “Vaccines and Related Biological Products; Advisory Committee Meeting; FDA Briefing Document Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine.” [1]

It is dated December 10, 2020. The date tells us that all the information in the document is taken from the Pfizer clinical trial, based on which the FDA authorized the vaccine for public use.

A key quote is buried on page 42: “Among 3410 total cases of suspected but unconfirmed COVID-19 in the overall study population, 1594 occurred in the vaccine group vs. 1816 in the placebo group [who received a saltwater shot].”

Those shocking numbers have never seen the light of day in news media.

The comparative numbers reveal that the vaccine was not effective at preventing COVID-19. It was certainly not 50% more effective than a placebo shot—the standard for FDA Emergency Use Authorization.

So...clinical trial results showed that:

"1594 [cases] occurred in the vaccine group"
"1816 [cases] occurred in the placebo group"

However, according to the article, vaccines MUST prove to be at least 50% or MORE effective than a placebo in order to receive Emergency Use Authorization from the FDA.

The above Pfizer CT results do not indicate this benchmark was reached.

AND...

The FDA document also states: “Suspected COVID-19 cases that occurred within 7 days after any vaccination were 409 in the vaccine group vs. 287 in the placebo group.”

That’s explosive. Right after vaccination, 409 people who received the shots became “suspected COVID cases.” This alone should have been enough to stop the clinical trial altogether. But it wasn’t.

PDF: www.fda.gov...
blog.nomorefakenews.com...
(emphasis mine)

According to the Pfizer clinical trial, upon which the FDA authorized the vaccine for emergency public use...a very large percentage of test subjects became China Virus POSITIVE AFTER receiving the "vaccine" (NOT 50% more effective than placebo)...and this, alone, should've been enough to stop the clinical trial...and prevent any Emergency Use Authorization for the Pfizer China Virus "vaccine".

To explain this and keep the trial afloat to gain it's EUA...the Pfizer trial posits:

It is possible that the imbalance in suspected COVID-19 cases occurring in the 7 days post vaccination represents vaccine reactogenicity with symptoms that overlap with those of COVID-19. Overall though, these data do not raise a concern that protocol-specified reporting of suspected, but unconfirmed COVID-19 cases could have masked clinically significant adverse events that would not have otherwise been detected.

www.fda.gov...

Pfizer is just covering their ass here by essentially saying:

Well, actually we can't really be sure if we were testing actual China Virus cases to begin with...which could mean that maybe our CT was flawed...but also, maybe not...but we're not concerned about that so you shouldn't be either...so go ahead and give us Emergency Use Authorization anyway--You know you want to."

Of course this is smoke and mirrors...and, as the article goes on to explain:

What does “suspected cases” mean?

It can only mean these people all displayed symptoms consistent with the definition of COVID-19, but they’re unconfirmed cases because…their PCR tests were negative, not positive.

However, if their tests were negative, why would they be called “suspected cases” instead of “NOT CASES”?

Something is wrong here. The FDA is hedging its bets, muddying the waters, obscuring facts.

By FDA/CDC rules, a case of COVID-19 means: a person has tested positive, period.

That’s the way cases are counted.

It's apparent that the Pfizer clinical trial buried and excused the fact that the "vaccine" was NOT at least 50% more effective than a placebo at preventing China Virus infection...in order to receive it's EUA from an FDA that really wanted to grant it anyway.

Both Pfizer and the FDA KNEW the "vaccine" was NOT effective enough for Emergency Use Authorization.


But it was granted anyway....so here we are.

The pearl clutchers will be along in a minute to tell you have to have the jab no matter if it works or not. For their sake of course, because they don't feel safe if everyone hasn't had it. They seem to think they have the right to tell you what to do with your own body.

If they're that scared, they should just stay home and let the rest of us get on with life.

The vaccine was always about the severity of the illness if you caught vivid.

Reducing how I'll and for how long. This helps reduce the spread if the catchee has a reduced active virus period.

So it's working as intended.

Very similar to flu shots, although almost double the effectiveness of the flu shot.

a reply to: Nexttimemaybe

While I have no intention of ever getting the shot, I think you have raised a very fair point

The “vaccines” have proved beyond a shadow of a doubt just how brainwashed, afraid, illogical and just plain stupid the vast majority of people are.

Why the hell would anyone willingly take this poison, with a whole slew of very bad possible side effects is beyond me. Especially for a disease that has almost no chance of killing you.

The vaxxed people know deep down that it was a foolish decision, so they must now bring everyone who doesn’t make decisions based off pure emotion down with them.

I’ve always been interested in the stories of people who just leave everything and go live in the woods away from any type of society. I understand the mindset of why they would do that now more than ever.

a reply to: Nexttimemaybe

So you like the covid to spread around more easily because the 'vaccinated' do not know they have it even though they are spreading it? I think the makers of this 'vaccine' could have done much better than that.

“Among 3410 total cases of suspected but unconfirmed COVID-19 in the overall study population, 1594 occurred in the vaccine group vs. 1816 in the placebo group [who received a saltwater shot].”

My question would be, why were these cases NOT confirmed. No test available? Otherwise, how could you possibly know those numbers are accurate. "Suspected but unconfirmed" cases won't cut it for me.

a reply to: Nexttimemaybe

That's BS. It was rolled out as a vaccine.

They're trying to call it a vaccine, which it's not. And they keep moving the goal posts. And you keep carrying their water for them.

originally posted by: Raggedyman
a reply to: Nexttimemaybe

While I have no intention of ever getting the shot, I think you have raised a very fair point

And I support your choice even though I think you should get a vax.

I also hope you dont catch and develop a severe case of vivid.

originally posted by: Raggedyman

While I have no intention of ever getting the shot, I think you have raised a very fair point

So when they say 95% effective, or 72% effective with Delta just what does that mean? I think that is the key point in you can get the virus as RNA based vaccines for RNA base viruses are not what we would call pure vaccines, so you can still get it but at a reduce rate and a much reduce symptoms.

Even though I have had the vaccine I really do not know what they mean by XX% effective. In OR they are reporting that as of yesterday, 733 patients with COVID-19 were in Oregon hospitals, and 185 of those were in intensive care, so it is getting serious for them with the Delta varent, they are also saying the vast majority are unvacced, so getting the jab is working, but their numbers saying its effectiveness don't make sense.

BUT The Science !!! 😀

Proof the FDA has been politically infiltrated !!!!!!!😀

a reply to: IAMTAT

My daughter has been telling me that for a while, but I am not "trusted science" like the bubble heads in CNN and the dumb media.

Now you can trust those.



None works directly with the covid infected they just talk crap.

a reply to: DAVID64



Ummm...the pearl clutchers...

can clutch my pearls...




YouSir

a reply to: IAMTAT

It is mindboggling how the followers of the cult of covid will ignore all of this.

Dear leader Fauci is the only one who can give them counsel, he says this is dangerous and our freedoms must be taken in order to protect his flock.

Soon they will be calling for camps.

So quick question fellow ATSians.

Is this what some of you might call a “smoking gun”?

Because it sure seems that way to me.

Hope you’re all having a decent weekend.

a reply to: slatesteam

I think this is slow motion video of the projectile leaving the barrel. Still waiting on the super and ultra slow motion video though.

a reply to: Nexttimemaybe

prefer to take my chances with vivid than Bill Gates vaccine
Parasites, politicians and pharmaceutical companies, living of extortion, pretending to be saviours when the reality is they manufactured it

Ivermectin baby

Anyone here watch Sky News?

They mention all the time what should be clear Delta is weaker and yet they are treating it as though it were very bad compared to the one that 99.7 or such live through with just mild flu symptoms.

a reply to: IAMTAT

But ... we all knew this in advance because Fauci told us what was likely to happen.

The only people saying that the vax was going to be some magical solution were conservative news pundits claiming that liberals thought this.

Come on, this is basic stuff. Didn't you do this in health class in school?