It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Vasa Croe
a reply to: NightVision
Is that Ace Frehly from KISS on his arm? LOL!
originally posted by: Gothmog
originally posted by: NightVision
Hitler, a failed painter, essentially became art director for the 3rd Reiche. He was very specific about the art direction, font usage, and design of the Nazi's, up to and including a design guide for all placement of Logos and propaganda. Can a font be racist? Perhaps. Just perhaps.
Hitler's Design Guide
People can be racist .
Fonts , not at all .
Denying ignorance.
Why ?
Folks can be ignorant . Fonts cannot.
originally posted by: NightVision
originally posted by: Gothmog
originally posted by: NightVision
Hitler, a failed painter, essentially became art director for the 3rd Reiche. He was very specific about the art direction, font usage, and design of the Nazi's, up to and including a design guide for all placement of Logos and propaganda. Can a font be racist? Perhaps. Just perhaps.
Hitler's Design Guide
People can be racist .
Fonts , not at all .
Denying ignorance.
Why ?
Folks can be ignorant . Fonts cannot.
Technically you are correct. Fonts can, however, be appropriated the same way Flags/Symbols can be appropriated (ex. Rebel Flag, Swastika). The use of those symbols depending on the time /public perception of them can call into question the user's motive, even if no harm was intended.
For example, Fraktur is an old style of blackletter font used on Hitler’s "Mein Kampf" and early Nazi letterheads. Because of this, Hyndman said this typeface can often be associated with racism or bigotry.
originally posted by: NightVision
originally posted by: Gothmog
No.
No matter what wild logic one uses , fonts cannot be racist.
I'm agreeing with you. I'm talking about cancel-culture/mass-media perception. Not my own.
originally posted by: seagull
a reply to: game over man
Fonts are a tool.
Just as hammers, or sickles, are tools.
They just sit there, of themselves they're utterly neutral. It's the people using them that are, or are not, racist/bigoted.
Please do attempt, notice the word "attempt" to explain how a tool is racist. I'm betting you can't.
originally posted by: Butterfinger
Ok, I got a new one... Rope is racist because hangings
We already know you cant get raw cotton because of racism.
How about farms in general?
Not only are words violence but also the way you see the letters?
originally posted by: Ahabstar
a reply to: game over man
Why type when you can link
originally posted by: Butterfinger
a reply to: game over man
Unless its a draw string for a garage door, right?