The IDs of the Parties involved in the 2007 Nimitz UFO Video Leak are Known!!!

a reply to: TheGeneral33

Been a long time General. I think we were last in discussion over little green men in Omagh was it?

As for who leaked it and why, I'm not sure, but it's pretty obvious the u.s navy want this out there, to start seeping into everyone's grey matter, or someone would have been doing time by now.

It still puzzles me why the pentagon claimed the video was widely circulated and therefore did not deem investigations worthwhile pursuing. Knowing full well the video had been posted here on ATS . Surely even back in 2004 there were security measures to track someone downloading a video off a secure military system?

If a handful of posters on ATS can trace the ID of the alleged perpetrator then it doesn't say a lot for American intelligence does it?

There's something very wrong from the very start of the story. Right up to ths continuing use of a bunch of social media influences to continue to hype this story for all it's worth. All orchestrated by those higher up the food chain in Tom's Primary and Secondary advisory groups. But who sits at the very top of this chain?

Haha, little grey men in Armagh allegedly I would of thought that military computer systems the world over would be at least password protected, the ones I have used certainly were and by 2004 they may have had even more protection. So if that is the case and the u.s navy were allegedly so concerned about the stolen data/video, why didn't they just round up all who had access to the password and waterboard them or whatever pass times they like to get upto to extract a confession. If you download something from the net to a pc obviously it leaves a trace and tells you that a file has been downloaded, but if you download a file or data/video from a pc to a external hard drive or disk I'm not sure that leaves a searchable trace, I could be wrong as I'm far from a computer wiz. There's definitely something amiss with this story MM and I think your on the right track, in my opinion I think it's a timed release to help along a certain agenda like I've already stated, most probably some kind of operation is underway, who knows! The fact is the u.s navy knew this info had gotten out somehow and did very little to stop it, even when they were acting so concerned and then now they jump on the band wagon with TTSA claiming all this uap/ufo stuff is real, very suspicious. I could be wrong and all this might have happened just like is claimed and if so let's hope big Lou can get the Holloman landing footage out there or maybe the rendelsham video, (sorry MM that's another thread or TWO ) that might impress a few on here.

a reply to: mirageman

Maybe the video never was a Navy video...

Just seen this -
www.cnn.com...

a reply to: TheGeneral33

Me too....

originally posted by: KansasGirl
a reply to: mirageman

Maybe the video never was a Navy video...

Whether it was or it wasn't US Navy footage somebody edited it. Someone compressed it and someone uploaded it on a foreign film company's web server.

So there are question marks against how the videos came into existence and the public domain to this day.

The story of how the FLIR video ended up on Vision Unlimited's server is also a strange one. Why would an IT technician need to pass it onto someone else to upload?

Vision Unlimited is ran by a handful of people out of a house in Germany. I think it was just three people in 2007 when the video was leaked.

A company that also specialises in sourcing providing historical military video and film footage.

The owner, Phil Schneider, was even questioned about how the videos ended up on the vision unlimited website back in 2017. Denying it was produced by the company and any knowledge as to why it was uploaded to their servers.

..
GreWi-Editor Andreas Muller asked the manager of “Vision Unlimited”, Mr. Philip Schneider about the above described situation and he explains:

“Unfortunately, I can’t help at all. We don’t know where the file came from and can only say that it hasn’t been on the server for a long time since. Because the case is so strange, we also wanted to investigate. But quickly this showed to be fruitless because the file was on an old server and all data (LOGs etc.) are no longer available. I’ve also talked to former employees who had access to the server, but no one could tell me anything about it.”

On a further inquiry to clarify that the video in question is NOT a product of “Vision Unlimited”, Schneider summarizes the situation again from VU’s point of view: “Yes correct – we have nothing to do with the video!

Gre.Wi - Dec 30th 2017

Also as highlighted earlier in the thread. Jeremy Grand Canyon Heather Locklear Rangya Doorbell is alleged to have had the GoFast video long before TTSA 'unofficially' released it into the public domain. In fact even before the administrative bungling between Zondo and others over the DD-1910 form.

What does appear to be happening is that TTSA's current agenda is one that also suits the US Navy to some extent. Plus of course Elizondo won't even prove he had a role in AATIP and end the debate once and for all. Instead hiding behind the TTSA social media influencers under the guidance of George Knapp and others to make excuses for him.
My guess is that this is the way it has been designed.

What does appear to be happening is that TTSA's current agenda is one that also suits the US Navy to some extent.

Correct

a reply to: mirageman

My guess is that this is the way it has been designed. 

Probably.

hmmmm. The Rendlesham boys also say their stuff is by design.

a reply to: Baablacksheep

hmmmm. The Rendlesham boys also say their stuff is by design.

On a little side note, after leaving the military i became employed in the nuclear sector (a job I'm still in) I think I mentioned this to MM before, but when speaking to one of the old school boffins at sizewell a few years ago, I mentioned the Rendlesham case, as it's on the doorstep, and I like to ask questions, anyway this guy who looked like he had just stepped out of a time machine from the 1970's (he's actually a nice guy) swore blind it was all a live test of our very exotic but very earthly tech that involved both u.s, uk and British energy at the time. Good little tail, but I digress.

a reply to: TheGeneral33

A lot of tales re the RFI are there not? Onwards it continues binary codes and all😉.

The last I heard it appears John Burroughs has most the answers now and about to let it loose. I suspect in time for the 40th.

Interesting tale General33.

So it appears Chris Mellon has admitted to providing the NY Times the 3 videos for their 2017 article.

Maybe next, someone will reveal who shared the famous footage with ATS 10 years prior.

originally posted by: coursecatalog

I have never been able to figure out who Brother Blue was or where he disappeared to ...

I know who Brother Blue is. His name is Devin and lives in Southern California.

I was a big fan of his writings back in the '90s and always wondered who he was. After a bit of a search I found him on Facebook a couple of years ago.

a reply to: JupiterSpace
That pentacle memo he mentions...we sort of have an alternative to the proposal in that memo. Uncontrolled experiments which give some of the answers that pentacle memo was seeking:

Satellite Reentry Fireball Swarms -- Widely Misperceived by Startled Witnesses

I remember hearing witnesses of the Kecksburg UFO saying it had to be an intelligently operated craft and couldn't be an inanimate object, because it was making maneuvers. So people might tend to dismiss the bolide explanation for Kecksburg.

But a few months ago there were witnesses talking about a satellite re-entry making maneuvers. Apparently it's some kind of optical illusion, because re-entering satellites don't make maneuvers, and there are videos of the satellite re-entry so you can see for yourself. So I think we now have some of the answers that were being sought in the thought experiment in the Pentacle memo, but is anybody paying attention?

originally posted by: mirageman
Also as highlighted earlier in the thread. Jeremy Grand Canyon Heather Locklear Rangya Doorbell is alleged to have had the GoFast video long before TTSA 'unofficially' released it into the public domain. In fact even before the administrative bungling between Zondo and others over the DD-1910 form.

Corbel's explanation for that made no sense at all.

a reply to: JupiterSpace

He's passed on I'm afraid.

a reply to: JupiterSpace

Is he still alive? I have heard that he died (as 1ofthe9 said).

originally posted by: coursecatalog
a reply to: JupiterSpace

Is he still alive? I have heard that he died (as 1ofthe9 said).

Looking at his Facebook page shows his last public post was December 31st, 2020.

a reply to: mirageman

(Peaks out of lurk)

I’m curious if u’ve heard Tim’s recent appearance on Church, he makes an odd case that Elizondo was improperly investigated for the videos, and actually suggests that the IG intends to reprimand OSI over it...

I also want to note that Tim has really ramped up his public support of all things Lu... I can’t believe I used to think this guy was critical of ttsa.

I believe it starts @1:20:00

youtu.be...

a reply to: InspectaBecky

What's with the guitar waving?