It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Politico admitted that they hadn't contacted the Bank of China before going to print, and had relied on public documents. Following the report, the Bank of China told the outlet that they had 'sold off, or securitized, its debt shortly after the 2012 deal,' and that the bank has no current financial interest in any properties related to the Trump Organization.
originally posted by: odzeandennz
a reply to: AndyFromMichigan
therefore, Trump never owed money... or..??the documents available were made up? or they didn't have the banks transactions or the documents were just documents made available via public notaries based on official documents?
I'm missing the perfectly logical explanation
if only tax returns could surface... we'd see all the fake news behind the secretive dealings of saint Lord Trump.
he sure has a lot of nothing to hide...
originally posted by: Allaroundyou
a reply to: carewemust
You sure about that?
Look up a few things about them then tell me who they are really working for.
Even FOX news has a few things to say about them.
originally posted by: odzeandennz
a reply to: AndyFromMichigan
therefore, Trump never owed money... or..??the documents available were made up? or they didn't have the banks transactions or the documents were just documents made available via public notaries based on official documents?
I'm missing the perfectly logical explanation
if only tax returns could surface... we'd see all the fake news behind the secretive dealings of saint Lord Trump.
he sure has a lot of nothing to hide...