It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: MadLad
originally posted by: bobs_uruncle
originally posted by: MadLad
originally posted by: bobs_uruncle
originally posted by: MadLad
originally posted by: bobs_uruncle
a reply to: MadLad
Prove you control your own actions by proving you can control all of your constituents parts.
You can't. If a stray gamma ray, for example intersected a neuron and triggered an electrochemical response making a decision that you are hungry or turning you into a murderer, what controlled the creation of the decision, you or the gamma ray?
Thinking that we have free will is like religious zealots in the dark ages thinking the entire universe rotated around the earth lol. Believing the fallacy of "free will" actually anchors you to this construct.
Cheers - Dave
I do control all of my constituent parts. Though a gamma ray could theoretically damage a constituent part, it takes a leap of absurdity to say it controls all subsequent actions.
Actually, studies have shown that people with a strong belief in free will perform better in a variety of contexts, such as in work and academic settings. Likewise, studies involving experimental manipulations of the belief in free will have demonstrated that weakening people’s belief in free will increases antisocial behavior, such as cheating, racial prejudice, and aggressiveness toward others, as well as decreases prosocial attitudes expressed in altruistic and cooperative behavior.
Like I said, prove it, prove that you have control of all of your constituent parts and that nothing can influence your ability in making decisions.
Cheers - Dave
That’s what the whole OP is about. I gave the example of the heartbeat. What besides yourself makes your heart beat? You could start there.
Your heartbeat, like your breathing is under autonomous automatic control. It is part of a neural/biological feedback system. It has nothing to do with you or anyone else making a decision to control the rate or efficiency of your heartbeat. Your or anyone else's heartbeat has nothing to do with free will.
When I said prove it, I really meant prove it, because I know with extremely high probability that you can't prove free will exists. In order to prove almost anything with 100% certainty, one would have to exist outside the observed reality (system being measured). The question of free will is not unlike asking what the length of a yardstick is on earth and in a deep gravity well because it's different depending on your point of reference. To the person holding the yardstick, it looks like 36" on earth and in the gravity well. To a person outside the system it might look like 36" on earth, but in the gravity well it would be compressed and would look to be some small fraction of 36".
So, inside our reality construct we have the illusion of free will. An observer outside our reality construct would see us like characters in a movie, reading our lines and going through the motions.
Cheers - Dave
It has everything to do with free will.
Whose impulses control your own heart? Your own. No other person, object or thing in the universe makes your heart beat. No appealing to imaginary “reality constructs” and “illusions” will ever cease your control over your own heartbeat. Only when you cease producing the impulse to keep your heart beating will it stop beating.
As I argued, this is a problem with identity. Opponents of free will refuse to believe that the so called “autonomous automatic control”, or subconscious, is a part of them and wholly regulated, generated, and controlled by them and them alone.
originally posted by: Willtell
a reply to: MadLad
Free will is an illusion of ignorance.
One doesn’t know the usually hidden processes that will actually determine one's choices outside of the facile determination.
originally posted by: MadLad
a reply to: bobs_uruncle
I’m not sure you understand what I’m trying to say.
You don’t have to be aware of every working process in your being to say it is still you controlling it. You are, whether you are conscious of it or not. Every process within ourselves is governed and regulated by the very organism they sustain: ourselves.
originally posted by: bobs_uruncle
originally posted by: MadLad
a reply to: bobs_uruncle
I’m not sure you understand what I’m trying to say.
You don’t have to be aware of every working process in your being to say it is still you controlling it. You are, whether you are conscious of it or not. Every process within ourselves is governed and regulated by the very organism they sustain: ourselves.
I perfectly understand and disagree based on simple logic lol.
Cheers - Dave
originally posted by: MadLad
originally posted by: bobs_uruncle
originally posted by: MadLad
a reply to: bobs_uruncle
I’m not sure you understand what I’m trying to say.
You don’t have to be aware of every working process in your being to say it is still you controlling it. You are, whether you are conscious of it or not. Every process within ourselves is governed and regulated by the very organism they sustain: ourselves.
I perfectly understand and disagree based on simple logic lol.
Cheers - Dave
That wasn’t simple logic.
It’s a question of identity. Do you or do you not identify with the “automatic impulses”, conscious and subconscious, which govern every action and even your entire livelihood? If so, then you govern every action and your entire livelihood.
originally posted by: MadLad
originally posted by: Willtell
a reply to: MadLad
Free will is an illusion of ignorance.
One doesn’t know the usually hidden processes that will actually determine one's choices outside of the facile determination.
What else besides yourself determines your choices? “Hidden processes”? What hidden processes?
originally posted by: Willtell
originally posted by: MadLad
originally posted by: Willtell
a reply to: MadLad
Free will is an illusion of ignorance.
One doesn’t know the usually hidden processes that will actually determine one's choices outside of the facile determination.
What else besides yourself determines your choices? “Hidden processes”? What hidden processes?
Things like your unconscious, subconscious, hidden biases, hidden programming, and things outside of your immediate awareness that impact on all your decisions.
But the good thing is we aren’t aware that were basically slaves to these hidden processes so people get the illusion and think they have free choice.
So it doesn’t matter as long as you think you do then you have it
In this case, ignorance is truly bliss
originally posted by: Willtell
a reply to: MadLad
www.theatlantic.com...
As long as we don't know.
originally posted by: MadLad
originally posted by: Itisnowagain
a reply to: MadLad
Ask Google....... Is there a thinker of thoughts?
And see what shows up.
I wouldn’t have to ask google if there was no thinker of thoughts.
originally posted by: MadLad
a reply to: bobs_uruncle
I understand. But as I stated, your belief that you are just a little man or thing riding in a “meat suit” is a fallacy, simply because of the infinite regression. In other words, it’s poor thinking as far as I’m concerned. But it’s not uncommon.
originally posted by: Itisnowagain
originally posted by: MadLad
originally posted by: Itisnowagain
a reply to: MadLad
Ask Google....... Is there a thinker of thoughts?
And see what shows up.
I wouldn’t have to ask google if there was no thinker of thoughts.
Honestly... ask Google.....
Is there a thinker of thoughts?
Are you afraid to look?
originally posted by: bobs_uruncle
originally posted by: MadLad
a reply to: bobs_uruncle
I understand. But as I stated, your belief that you are just a little man or thing riding in a “meat suit” is a fallacy, simply because of the infinite regression. In other words, it’s poor thinking as far as I’m concerned. But it’s not uncommon.
Yeah, ok, lol. You do realize that you have to break a few philosophical eggs to make a metaphysical omelette, right?
Cheers - Dave