It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: kelbtalfenek
Not a bad idea, but I can still see tons of things that could go wrong. Where does the culpability lie if the "POST" volunteer freezes and doesn't intervene in a shooting?
What if the POST volunteer intervenes and in the fog of combat shoots the wrong kid? Kills the wrong kid? Who is liable?
I understand your concern that "no gun zones" are basically a murderers paradise. But try to understand my point that having guns in classrooms, armed citizens in hallways or whereever in the schools doesn't and won't reliably reduce the threat. An armed police officer didn't reduce the threat in Parkland.
I kinda prefer reducing the chances that a mental case, or a person with violent tendencies, or a person that has been investigated several times and actually threatened to be "a professional school shooter" can legally purchase a weapon.
originally posted by: burgerbuddy
originally posted by: SlapMonkey
These, IMO, are all pieces of the puzzle. I'm mostly concerned, though, with the affect of medication that nearly every mass shooter is taking at the time of their atrocities.
originally posted by: kelbtalfenek
originally posted by: SlapMonkey
These, IMO, are all pieces of the puzzle. I'm mostly concerned, though, with the affect of medication that nearly every mass shooter is taking at the time of their atrocities.
That's another gordian knot that needs to be dissected. When a high percentage of mass murderers are taking meds that have possible side effects of "psychotic behavior" and it seems to be a very common thread, there's a serious problem that warrants discussion. I think that this link is being pushed under the rug.
originally posted by: ColdChillin
a reply to: kelbtalfenek really? Because here in Texas we have 170 school districts with armed teachers. Know what else we don’t have? Gangs jumping other students in those districts and bullying is at the minuscule level. Before you say, but teachers aren’t supposed to protect their students, my Mom is a teacher and I’m all for it. So is she. The thing is, it isn’t like ALL teachers are armed, only the ones who want to be. They do routine training with yearly checks AND target practice on the regular. Lots of ranges here give them free ammo and range time to hone their skills and I think it’s a beautiful, selfless thing for all involved.
originally posted by: ColdChillin
a reply to: kelbtalfenek really? Because here in Texas we have 170 school districts with armed teachers. Know what else we don’t have? Gangs jumping other students in those districts and bullying is at the minuscule level.
Before you say, but teachers aren’t supposed to protect their students, my Mom is a teacher and I’m all for it. So is she. The thing is, it isn’t like ALL teachers are armed, only the ones who want to be. They do routine training with yearly checks AND target practice on the regular. Lots of ranges here give them free ammo and range time to hone their skills and I think it’s a beautiful, selfless thing for all involved.
originally posted by: Autorico
a reply to: kelbtalfenek
I can understand why some people don't believe that SSRI's can cause psychotic breaks or hostility, because I didn't believe it until it happened to me personally. Sometimes it has to be up close for someone to really see it.