It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: DJW001
a reply to: IgnoranceIsntBlisss
I always apply critical thinking to news reports, and I track down original sources whenever possible. In liberal democracies, the press has always been viewed as a counter balance to the government. This is why the media are free to criticize public officials, and they often break stories that are embarrassing for the government.
In countries like Russia and Iran, the media is controlled by the state. It is safe to assume that any story they publish will, in some way, advance the state's agenda. It is therefore not unreasonable to ask what agenda this story is supporting. At the most superficial level, it seems to be pushing the theme of "NATO aggression," although both sides have clearly been playing chicken for quite some time.
My speculation is that the Kremlin may be trying to show some tension between Russia and the current administration in order to influence public opinion in the United States. But Russia never uses propaganda to advance its policy goals, right?
originally posted by: Zaphod58
Honestly, from the video it doesn't look like the Viper was even armed. The Flanker looks like he was just trying to push him out a little farther away, not show him he was armed and scare him off. As soon as the Viper started moving farther out, the Flanker tucked right back into formation. If they were worried he was going to do something they would have stayed closer to him, not tucked back against the transport.
originally posted by: Zaphod58
a reply to: GuidedKill
The Viper has wingtip rails, so he might have missiles on them. I'm on my phone so the normally not great resolution is not great and really tiny. Sometimes though, it's a matter of "you're airborne and close, go see what it is".
originally posted by: Zaphod58
a reply to: PublicOpinion
The video out of the B-1 a couple weeks ago was downright boring. I'd love to see the Constant Phoenix or Combat Sent video too.
There's a picture I got to see in a ready room on a carrier once that I'd love to see out in the wild, but it won't happen. Nice routine intercept of a Tu-95 near a carrier group, but the F-14 flying off their wing had the RIO in a gorilla mask.
There's no comparison. Meaning they have less than 1/10th the motivations to construct a mass deception.
originally posted by: DJW001
a reply to: 2012newstart
Did NATO commanders understand that to treaten to kill such person in past time was considered Casus Belli, cause of war?
Did the NATO pilot have x-ray vision so that he could see who was on the plane? Or did he just see Russian planes in Polish territory?