It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: teslahowitzer
a reply to: Xeven. But who plays by the"rules"? No one on the list, some will push and push the agreed line in the sand. Something just smells here. But I agree it will escalate in one of the current skirmish areas where the tension is already approaching critical mass...
originally posted by: DJW001
a reply to: Lagomorphe
You forgot? Here is what you said:
My hunch is that NATO is trying to create the impression that there is tension between America and President Putin to add further smoke to the controversies surrounding him. Expect American trolls to claim that the jet was under orders from the "Deep State."
You reflexively used a trolling device that did not make sense under the circumstances. Your supervisor should dock you for that one.
Or what, nato doesn't know who is n civilian plane that flies to kaliningrad for a scheduled meeting of the defence minister? Damn it who is the troll then? The NATO general who ordered that f16.
I don't want to die by nuclear blast. If some want to, some nato generals, let they go.
After such incident, no thing less than top resignations may quell the furry. But they won't follow because it is not a mistake. It is provocation so russia can start the ww first. That is what USA leaders want
Don't you know even that? All Russian military planes fly from peterburg thru baltic not thru NATO airspace. Kaliningrad is still Russian territory.
I'm fury how easy those in Washington are ready to sacrifice allies and enemies alike with incident like that. Not even for oil...damn it Trump!
originally posted by: 2012newstart
a reply to: DJW001
I'll ask for third and last time, not just you but all. What if the plane was that of US defence sec approached by Russian fighter jet some 15 miles from us coast in neutral waters? What would the US do right now? Defcon 2 or defcon 1?
originally posted by: 2012newstart
a reply to: tadaman
Yes Soviets did a lot of mistakes.
www.rt.com...
Here is video of the incident from Shoigus plane. Specialists may say what kind of plane.I'm not one of them . NATO f 16 is pretty close even though he was seemingly not posed to shoot...
originally posted by: DJW001
originally posted by: Flatcoat
a reply to: DJW001
Yep.. They're russians so they must be lying......right?
No, but Russian media do not publish anything without government approval. Why are the Russian government and its trolls pushing this story? I'm not saying it's not true, but why even mention it, much less try to shove it down ATS's throat?
Someone posts a story, and it turns into Russian trolls trying to shove it down ATS's throat?
originally posted by: DJW001
originally posted by: 2012newstart
a reply to: tadaman
Yes Soviets did a lot of mistakes.
www.rt.com...
Here is video of the incident from Shoigus plane. Specialists may say what kind of plane.I'm not one of them . NATO f 16 is pretty close even though he was seemingly not posed to shoot...
The NATO jet is not approaching the plane, it is escorting it. The entire incident looks completely routine. Why are the Russian state media and troll army pushing this non-story?
originally posted by: 23432
originally posted by: DJW001
originally posted by: 2012newstart
a reply to: tadaman
Yes Soviets did a lot of mistakes.
www.rt.com...
Here is video of the incident from Shoigus plane. Specialists may say what kind of plane.I'm not one of them . NATO f 16 is pretty close even though he was seemingly not posed to shoot...
The NATO jet is not approaching the plane, it is escorting it. The entire incident looks completely routine. Why are the Russian state media and troll army pushing this non-story?
Shoigu will probably become the next Leader in Russia ; you maybe guilty of underestimating the work of intelligence services ?