It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: iWontGiveUP
CIA FBI NSA about to be shaken to its corps
Meanwhile only 30 mikes away in Chantilly
A lot is happening rite now!
About to be some breaking news...
Popcorn đż
Stay Safe
President Trump on Thursday directly accused the Obama Administration of improperly surveilling the American people, a day after Congressional subpoenas were issued seeking records from U.S. spy agencies about Obama officialsâ requests.
The CIA, NSA and FBI were served with subpoenas Wednesday afternoon for documents relating to former Obama national security adviser Susan Rice, ex-CIA director John Brennan and former U.N. ambassador Samantha Power. The subpoenas, signed by House Intelligence Committee chairman Rep. Devin Nunes, R-Ca., explicitly referenced the âunmaskingâ of U.S. citizens.
âThe big story is the âunmasking and surveillanceâ of people that took place during the Obama Administration,â Trump tweeted. The inclusion of Powerâs name on the subpoenas marks her first appearance in the controversy surrounding the Obama administrationâs use of unmasking. Capitol Hill sources told Fox News they are devoting increasing scrutiny to Power â a former historian and winner of the Pulitzer Prize who worked as a foreign policy adviser in the Senate office of Barack Obama before joining his administration â because they have come to see her role in the unmasking as larger than previously known, and eclipsing those of the other former officials named. Rice has previously denied any improper activity in her use of unmasking.
âThe allegation is somehow Obama administration officials utilized intelligence for political purposes, that's absolutely false,â Rice told MSNBC on April 4. President Trump said at that time that he personally believed Rice had committed a crime.
None of those named on the subpoenas has been formally accused of wrongdoing. Continue Reading Below Nunes last month stepped aside from the House's investigation into alleged Russian meddling in the 2016 U.S. presidential election after he was hit with ethics charges involving the handling of classified information. However, subsequent comments he made in late April -- and which emerged only recently -- suggested he was still deeply involved in the Intelligence Committee's probe related to Obama-era spying
. "I went and looked at what I knew existed on the unmaskings, but what I found was a treasure trove of stuff thatâs really bad in terms of surveillance on Americans and that is critical to the job that I have as chairman of the House Intelligence Committee," Nunes said in remarks reported by The L.A. Times. "Itâs really horrible because it endangers America, because the work that our intelligence professionals do is so critical to our safety, to have an administration, a past administration, abuse these powers and put our country in jeopardy, thereâs nothing, thereâs no words that can explain the damage theyâve done and the damage that theyâve created." Fox Newsâ James Rosen contributed to this report.
originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: carewemust
Yes he did. It's not going to lead back to Hillary.
That's a hope without a hook to hang on.
This is about Russia's interference in the election. Not about Seth rich was the real leaker
That is a conspiracy theory . It's not real so no amount of investigating is going to lead back to Clinton.
originally posted by: network dude
originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: carewemust
Yes he did. It's not going to lead back to Hillary.
That's a hope without a hook to hang on.
This is about Russia's interference in the election. Not about Seth rich was the real leaker
That is a conspiracy theory . It's not real so no amount of investigating is going to lead back to Clinton.
not that you would grasp this, but if anyone on the inside leaked the DNC docs, then the entire Russia narrative is gone. let me know if you need help with that.
originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: carewemust
Yes he did. It's not going to lead back to Hillary.
That's a hope without a hook to hang on.
This is about Russia's interference in the election. Not about Seth rich was the real leaker
That is a conspiracy theory . It's not real so no amount of investigating is going to lead back to Clinton.