It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
It doesn't make it any less Racist m8.
originally posted by: Xcathdra
a reply to: haman10
You do know the "ban" is temporary right?
originally posted by: DBCowboy
I just wish Trump would ban Americans from traveling to the Middle East. Perhaps then, fewer Americans and westerners would be kidnapped and held hostage by the terrorist regime of Iran.
Thank you my friend, you stay well too. wish you and your people the best.
originally posted by: angeldoll
a reply to: haman10
Haman, who I would like call friend. It's just as well. Iranians would not be happy here at this moment in time.
We are not ourselves right now, or at least our baser selves are being revealed. It's temporary.
Stay well.
Angelina
No actually this ban is the exact definition of Racism. its a ban against Iranian ethnicity and race
originally posted by: imwilliam
We need to start having discussions about when "racism" (and bigotry for that matter), is warranted and when it is, to what degree and for how long. The conversation has been locked down for too long. Sometimes common sense demands it, a necessary evil if it makes it more palatable for you.
I'm not interested in putting American citizens at risk, in numbers impossible to accurately know for sure, just to avoid what is; in part, a manufactured stigma surrounding racism and bigotry.
I'm seeing many parallels between the problems that confront us today and the role that Islam plays in those problems and the problems we faced during the cold war and the role the Communists played in those problems.
There were elements in this country then preaching the positives of communism just as there are here now, preaching that we have nothing to fear from Islam. They were wrong then and they're wrong now. Something to consider is that in many cases, the extant of the infiltration, the damage done wasn't recognized until decades later. In other words, the "proof" of the infiltration and damage came too late too be part of the conversation while it was current. Hopefully we can learn from that.
No actually this ban is the exact definition of Racism. its a ban against Iranian ethnicity and race
"There i go" ? brother do you know that this kind of thing is not practiced anywhere in the world? do you feel safe if your government shared your information with Iran if you traveled here? I suppose not.
originally posted by: iTruthSeeker
a reply to: haman10
BTW, Iranian Govt. will not share any info on her citizens to any foreign country. so there is that...
Well there you go....
“There is a sense of bewilderment, as well as a sense of injustice,” over why Iran was even included on the list of targeted countries, Mr. Parsi said. No Iranian has been accused of an attack on the American homeland. By contrast, he said, the Sept. 11 attackers included citizens from countries which are not on the list — and “the United States has produced more ISIS fighters than Iran has.”
Evidence of Iran's involvement in Iraq has mounted in recent years. The military assistance Iran supplies the Shiite militias in Iraq – in financing, training, and armaments – has drawn most of the attention. At the same time, Iranian involvement in Iraq has political, economic, and religious dimensions, whereby Iran is seeking to forge a state with Shiite dominance sharing Iran's interests, a state that would not threaten Iran's standing in the region and would be as free of American influence as possible. The essay seeks to examine the nature of this involvement and the motivation behind it, as well as its limits and possible ramifications.
The Islamic Republic of Iran has conducted an extensive, expensive, and integrated effort to keep President Bashar al-Assad in power as long as possible while setting conditions to retain its ability to use Syrian territory and assets to pursue its regional interests should Assad fall.
It appears — even now — that Saudi Arabia’s ruling elite is divided. Some applaud that ISIS is fighting Iranian Shiite “fire” with Sunni “fire”; that a new Sunni state is taking shape at the very heart of what they regard as a historical Sunni patrimony; and they are drawn by Da’ish’s strict Salafist ideology.
originally posted by: neo96
Iran has produced more ISIS fighters than anyone.
Between Saudi Arabia, and Iran and the centuries old blood feud of which version of Islam is going to dominate.
Free your mind people.
Stop eating up hydrochloro bull hockey.
originally posted by: neo96
It appears — even now — that Saudi Arabia’s ruling elite is divided. Some applaud that ISIS is fighting Iranian Shiite “fire” with Sunni “fire”; that a new Sunni state is taking shape at the very heart of what they regard as a historical Sunni patrimony; and they are drawn by Da’ish’s strict Salafist ideology.
www.huffingtonpost.com...
Iran has produced more ISIS fighters than anyone.
Between Saudi Arabia, and Iran and the centuries old blood feud of which version of Islam is going to dominate.
Free your mind people.
Stop eating up hydrochloro bull hockey.