Wikileaks Released First Insurance File?

a reply to: Witness2008

Yes and the implications involve more than America, so international pressure will be that we put our D*** away and suck this up.

originally posted by: Witness2008
a reply to: roadgravel

Never paid much attention to all that Sony stuff. For some reason wikileaks is stalling out on me while I'm there.

Not very computer literate here but perhaps that downloaded stuff includes items to burrow into your computers so they know exactly who has been downloading in case they ever want to follow up. Surely, they have developed cookies to a high extent.

a reply to: Aliensun

Check your cookies.

Also, keep an eye out for mass Internet outages over the coming days.

Remember the wikileaks anniversary that was supposed to have a huge announcement?

It was alleged (this is reaching and I've found no reliable source) that during that press conference there were mass Internet outages in the US.
reddit page with sources and pics

originally posted by: EchoesInTime
a reply to: Cobaltic1978

London's Metropolitan Police used to maintain a visible presence outside the building, although officers were nowhere in sight when an AP journalist visited on Tuesday.

WikiLeaks did not return repeated messages seeking comment. Staff at the embassy declined comment. Ecuador's Foreign Minister Guillaume Long, approached by The Associated Press on the sidelines of a United Nations conference in Quito on Monday, declined to comment when asked about Assange. His office later released a terse statement in response to "the speculation of the last few hours" reaffirming Assange's asylum status and saying that "his protection by the Ecuadorean state will continue while the circumstances that led to the granting of asylum remain."

www.nbcnews.com...

London police are always stationed there but not there today. Not sure if that means anything.

Remember....FBI agents are allowed to pose as reporters. They posed as AP reporters before. AP filed a lawsuit and the DOJ ruled that it was perfectly legal, but then in June 2016, the FBI recommended another layer of oversight. Now, the DOJ has to be informed every time an FBI agent is undercover as a reporter, journalist, or documentary film maker.

In other words, that "AP reporter" may be an FBI agent for all we know.

Seems legit, if they are sh*ts going to fly soon.

I wonder what other info is at WL that hasn't been made available, if any.

a reply to: EchoesInTime

Wasn't the police presence withdrawn a while back?

These are certainly interesting times.

3 more keys have just been released.. 5 min ago

a reply to: Spacespider

link?

I see nothing on wikileaks twitter feed

originally posted by: jadedANDcynical
a reply to: Spacespider

link?

I see nothing on wikileaks twitter feed

mobile.twitter.com...

a reply to: Spacespider

Pretty sure they're referring to the three keys that were released Sunday.

a reply to: Spacespider

Those were just the hashkeys to verify file integrity. Not decryption seen.

originally posted by: drewlander
a reply to: Pyle

You realize pretty much every dead persons ssn is searchable on the internet, right?

sortedbyname.com...

Still you shouldn't be posting medical records. Alive or dead. Some lines you shouldn't cross.

a reply to: carewemust

well he looked pretty good here and this was just last friday
I admire the guy. Wouldnt wanna be in his shoes though..



(the interview is only the first 12 mins)

New tweet from wikileaks
twitter.com...

Ecuador admitted to cutting off Assange for the sake of our stupid, criminal presidential elections.

a reply to: Witness2008

Well I'd call them sell outs, but imagine trade, UN, and IMF ramifications if they don't at least act like they're playing ball.

a reply to: CriticalStinker
Well Ecuador did make a deal with the devil. They use our monetary system now.

originally posted by: CriticalStinker
Remember the wikileaks anniversary that was supposed to have a huge announcement?

No but i do remember the Wikileaks 10th Anniversary where Alex Jones predicted [wrongly] that there would be and a lot of people got their panties in a bunch because there was no announcement or leak. Wikileaks nor Assange himself said there would be anything released that day...

a reply to: Witness2008

What will be interesting to see is how long they keep that going. They said it's due to information being released about the election that they limited the communications (the irony of limiting information for a democratic election).

So, do they limit till then, if so I'm curious the contingency plan. Interesting move, why give up your insurance and risk imprisonment or worse.