Political correctness - the biggest danger to humanity

originally posted by: Fermy
a reply to: Rocker2013
No, don't be fatuous. Please point out the terrorist acts against UK Jews that have happened in the last 20 years or so.
I lived in Finchley for 4 years, all synagogues had private security paid for by the Jewish community. The Jewish Chronicle was demanding the government pay for more security. Were the London bombings targeting Jews? No, random civilians,Muslims,Christians,Jews,Hindus etc etc etc.
No single section of society deserves extra protection.

We don't need a terrorist act against Jews in this country to know that they are a target, if anything is fatuous it's this convenient selective ignorance of reality.

We know for a fact that Jewish groups have been targeted all over Europe for the last ten years. This is not some kind of fanciful make-believe nonsense.

If a group of people is being directly threatened then they should be protected, and it has nothing to do with their religion, race, culture or anything else.

Any group of people, any location, any site in this country should have increased protection when there is obviously a threat.

Do you think that if we have a threat expressed against the London Underground we should not provide more security to the London Underground? Do you view Londoners are less worthy of protection?

originally posted by: kayleighkitty
Nowadays, especially in Europe, where the muslim population is growing massively - and if you read the government consensus and forward the stats at the same rate to 100 years from now, it shows quite clearly that muslims will be a majority in Europe 100 years from now.

I'm pretty sure that religion is falling around the world, in 100 years I'm thinking that much more than 50% will either be atheists, agnostics or not practicing their religion roots.

Political correctness is a must for peacefull negociations.
If I wasn't using political correctness, I wouldn't be this nice to you considering the types of threads you've been authoring.

originally posted by: theMediator

originally posted by: kayleighkitty
Nowadays, especially in Europe, where the muslim population is growing massively - and if you read the government consensus and forward the stats at the same rate to 100 years from now, it shows quite clearly that muslims will be a majority in Europe 100 years from now.

I'm pretty sure that religion is falling around the world, in 100 years I'm thinking that much more than 50% will either be atheists, agnostics or not practicing their religion roots.

Political correctness is a must for peacefull negociations.
If I wasn't using political correctness, I wouldn't be this nice to you considering the types of threads you've been authoring.

is political correctness worth the systematic gang raping of thousands of predominantly white little girls? We brits have bent over backwards to accommodate our ethnic friends. This is now a matter of survival. Mohammed is already the most popular boys name for new borns. 100 years is a gross under estimate. We brits have been second class citizens in our own country for too long.

originally posted by: disregard
is political correctness worth the systematic gang raping of thousands of predominantly white little girls? We brits have bent over backwards to accommodate our ethnic friends.

Well that's not PC, that's getting abused.

Another thing that's getting abused is the word "accommodate", on that I agree with you.

a reply to: theMediatorthe abuses in rotherham was caused by political correctness. So what are you on about?

originally posted by: bastion

originally posted by: CharlieSpeirs
a reply to: intrepid


English comedy from that era is heavily based on racism and segregation...

Bernard Manning, Roy Chubby Brown, Alf Garnett...

I've heard Love Thy Neighbour was pretty racist as well...

Even recent times, up to Little Britain...
Which some may say "blacking up" is just Un-PC if it's a joke...

Seemed racist to watch though.





I remember an episode of Till Death Do Us Part (Alf Garnett sitcom)...

His TV was broken, that was the premise of the episode...

He tried everything to fix it...

Had to call a technician...

The technician was black...

He fixed it...

Plenty of racialism in between and Alf Garnett says "how did you fix that"...

The technician replied "black magic"...



Probably hilarious at the time...
But edgy a little later...
Now, probably wouldn't be screened...

PC reasons...
Because the message was that the black fella got one over on the old racist...




But then there was people like Bernard Manning and Chubby Brown who were strictly just offensive...
Funny at times, but more often than not, just hardcore racists.

All good points, however I feel the need to point out the Alf Garnett sitcom was designed to take the mick out of people stupid enough to act that way - but cleverly written so they wouldn't pick up on it. Same way Al Murray plays the rascist pub landlord to take the mick out of EDL types nowadays.

Manning, Brown et al were just plain racist/offensive though. I support Stewrt Lee's view of PC that it's at worst a form of institutionalised politeness that has stopped the Tories from being able to use the slogan 'If you want a ni**er for a neighbour, vote labour' which is clearly a good thing.

for who? You seem lost in a fantasy utopia. Like it or not britain is devided. The indiginous have lower wages, lowest percentage going to university and gangs of men wanting,targeting their children to gang rape them. Rents are sky high,benefits are cut ,disabled kicked of benefits. All the time schools are full of roma ,education reduced to buissness like efficiences and so on.
Add this too foodbanks, zero hour contracts and the poor squeezed and vilified to sub human levels. Its a nightmare for most while the rich get richer..
What lovely planet do you live on?

Just to be Devil's advocate:

originally posted by: disregard
The indiginous have lower wages,

I see more foreign workers undercutting cash in hand and below minimum wage, I don't believe you are correct, unless you mean that wages generally have dropped with increased Eastern EU immigration.

lowest percentage going to university

Got a link to a study backing that up?

and gangs of men wanting,targeting their children to gang rape them.

I'll not disagree given current mass charges and convictions in some towns.

Rents are sky high,benefits are cut ,disabled kicked of benefits.

For all ethnic groups.

All the time schools are full of roma ,education reduced to buissness like efficiences and so on.

Blame EU free movement of people, not those who choose to enjoy the opportunity. If the streets were paved with gold in Poland I'd learn basic Polish and be off in a heartbeat. No different to all the UK builders who laboured in 80's Germany.

Add this too foodbanks, zero hour contracts and the poor squeezed and vilified to sub human levels. Its a nightmare for most while the rich get richer..

...and the inequalities which cut through all ethnicity and races equally.

originally posted by: Rocker2013

originally posted by: Fermy
a reply to: Rocker2013
No, don't be fatuous. Please point out the terrorist acts against UK Jews that have happened in the last 20 years or so.
I lived in Finchley for 4 years, all synagogues had private security paid for by the Jewish community. The Jewish Chronicle was demanding the government pay for more security. Were the London bombings targeting Jews? No, random civilians,Muslims,Christians,Jews,Hindus etc etc etc.
No single section of society deserves extra protection.

We don't need a terrorist act against Jews in this country to know that they are a target, if anything is fatuous it's this convenient selective ignorance of reality.

We know for a fact that Jewish groups have been targeted all over Europe for the last ten years. This is not some kind of fanciful make-believe nonsense.

If a group of people is being directly threatened then they should be protected, and it has nothing to do with their religion, race, culture or anything else.

Any group of people, any location, any site in this country should have increased protection when there is obviously a threat.

Do you think that if we have a threat expressed against the London Underground we should not provide more security to the London Underground? Do you view Londoners are less worthy of protection?

I repeat, please show any willful act of terrorism against UK Jewry that has occurred in the last 20 years, or in other words,since 9/11 and the so called war on terror. Or, the fraudulent war that supports Israels genocidal intolerance.
Stop waffling, make with the facts or STFU.

originally posted by: disregard
a reply to: theMediatorthe abuses in rotherham was caused by political correctness. So what are you on about?

No they weren't, they were caused by depravity and a failure to recognise the sanctity and equality of human life, by an alien culture that is even now encouraged to do as they wish.
The failure of the authorities to act on such industrial abuse was down to fear of being labelled racist. That's how it is in the UK.
You are yet another hand wringer who cannot see the real factors behind such barbarity.

a reply to: kayleighkitty

I will tell you why, because people are too scared to speak out, because they do not want to offend, it is because of political correctness.
For a good few decades now, people have slowly been mentally programmed to be absolutly terrified of speaking out, because they will be branded racist or islampahobic.

Whilst once again i need to stress i am absolutly against judging people on religion, or colour of skin, there is still a neutral line, which is to call things AS THEY ARE!

Very interesting. I assume if one was to criticise Israel and call things as they, i.e. war crimes, stealing of land etc etc. you'd be completely fine with that and you wouldn't start calling those people anti-semitic? Because I suspect your views would suddenly change.

In 100 years from now when our grandchildren in Europe are a minority, and are asking why, how did this happen when it could have been prevented. They will look back at their weak descendants who allowed this to happen.

So hang on...you're not for judging people based on their religion or skin colour etc. yet the above scares you - despite the fact 100 years from now you probably won't even be around. It could have been prevented? How so? The Nazis (who you invoked in the usual cliche) no doubt would have peddled such lines about the Jews. How sad.

I felt it very important to write this.
Now i need to get one thing very clear. The idea of nazi thugs or bnp skinheads marching down the road on a saturday afternoon drinking cans of beer shouting we hate muslims, is the kind of thing i am strongly against. So let me get that out of the way.

But you're not against starting a thread on the internet and using the whole "political correctness" line to cloak your own prejudices?

Immigrants into the UK pay far, far more in taxes than other immigrants take out of the system.
Sky high rents, zero hour contracts are nothing to do with immigrants but a conservative government that protects it's asset rich voters.

a reply to: grainofsand here you are www.express.co.uk...
And all your other points are imo directly proportional to immigration..
Boiling a frog slowly..

The jews are leaving france because there was 800 anti semtic recorded crimes..
Where can the white working class go?
Anyone for joining a white only group to increase the aspirations of the indiginous?

originally posted by: Fermy

originally posted by: disregard
a reply to: theMediatorthe abuses in rotherham was caused by political correctness. So what are you on about?

No they weren't, they were caused by depravity and a failure to recognise the sanctity and equality of human life, by an alien culture that is even now encouraged to do as they wish.
The failure of the authorities to act on such industrial abuse was down to fear of being labelled racist. That's how it is in the UK.
You are yet another hand wringer who cannot see the real factors behind such barbarity.

yes it was, it was in the report and david Cameron has repeatedly said the abuse was allowed because of some warped sense of "political correctness"
Why do you lie?

originally posted by: WilsonWilson
Immigrants into the UK pay far, far more in taxes than other immigrants take out of the system.
Sky high rents, zero hour contracts are nothing to do with immigrants but a conservative government that protects it's asset rich voters.

now you are being silly..

a reply to: disregard
Come on it's the Express for a start and it could be down to all sorts of reasons.
You can't blame immigrants for that, student loans are available for everyone.
It's not down to poverty either, I lived in a crap bedsit raising my son when I was a mature student, bunkbeds, he's a working full-time student now and looking forward to Uni himself.
...always looking for someone to blame, some people.

a reply to: grainofsand

Without mass immigration the people of britain would have had full employment,low house prices, higher wages,free education and much higher self respect..
You can blame who you want why this is the case.

We used to be a self preservation society now we are the idiots who let their kids be raped by the very people who supposedly benefit this country.. My ass

a reply to: disregard

Without mass immigration the people of britain would have had full employment,low house prices, higher wages,free education and much higher self respect..

And you're basing this on what?

We used to be a self preservation society

What does that even mean?

a reply to: disregard

No I'm not it's irritating that people allow the government to pint them at immigrants and the poor when the mess we are in is caused by the mainly white privately educated elite in this country. Who sold of the post office and made sure their public schoolboy friends made a profit, who allowed the bankers to make huge profits and bring the country to their knees, who gets away with evading tax but never face prosecution. Who benefits from zero hour contracts?

a reply to: disregard
EU 'free movement of people' immigration is your culprit, not Muslims, they do have the problem of sections in their community being disproportionately involved in organised child sexual exploitation though.
There will hopefully be a vote on EU freedom of movement in/out/whatever soon so I will be voting against free movement of unskilled people in the EU.
...even if it means I will no longer be able to move to Poland. Damn pity eh.

*Edit*
Actually I am skilled and if I could speak Polish they would probably want me, I just have no intention of doing so, their social and healthcare system is not attractive to me.

a reply to: Kram09 common sense, and if you cant understand that then what is the point?