It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Grimpachi
originally posted by: Kali74
I think it's sad that trolls (appropriate) want to make fun of activists which they do based on perceptions gained second hand but given the chance to hear from their own mouths, they don't take it.
Same with the science, we read all these mocking statements about the science and what bloggers claim scientists say but when given the chance to read actual papers... nope.
You're not interested in reality, circle jerks are more fun, right?
Don't mind them Kali it looks like they are simply but hurt over the turnout. Rally envy if you may. Can't really blame them since there rallies have been flop after flop I am sure they have had to tell themselves things like it was the weather or blame the public for being apathetic to causes and here they see no it was simply because their cause sucked. They are loud and like to circle jerk on here but the fringe is like that.
Some people you will never reach but in all honesty some of them you are better off not reaching because if they were to join in they would also bring along their crazy crap that would discredit the cause by association. Think about it do you really want groups like the birthers backing these things? Of course that isn't everyone opposed to this issue but I see a couple of them posting here.
originally posted by: macman
a reply to: Quetzalcoatl14
A google search produced more than what the Blaze had offered.
Again, cool story.
Have fun marching, while others work.
originally posted by: the2ofusr1
This vid says it all when it comes to celeb's speaking out . It's all about the money and like you say if it was a genuine concern the police state and msm would be going against it . As it stands msm in their one sided look at the issue fail big time . a reply to: dreamingawake
originally posted by: macman
a reply to: Quetzalcoatl14
I never stated to get a job. I said work.
And the search results showed a heavy presence of Socialists and Communists.
And to compare this crap to MLK jr is pretty disgusting.
climateaudit.org... a reply to: Quetzalcoatl14
The WMO figure makes one more appearance in the CG dossier. In a remarkable letter, worth reproducing in full, late George Kukla writes in January 2001 to Keith Briffa, in which Kukla asked Briffa about the inconsistency between the WMO presentation of the data and the decline shown in Briffa’s technical papers, describing the WMO presentation as “not very responsible”:
Dear Keith,
You are the only guy who may know what was and is going on in the northern forests. With respect to that I do not think that the WMO statement # 913 on the status of the global climate in 1999 is a sufficiently reliable last word. For one thing: the curve attributed to you doesn’t seem to jive with any of the figures of your 2000 QSR paper. Where from did they get the 0.6 degree departure at 1600 AD?
Another problem: the ring density and width in the last several decades are both decreasing which at any other
time would be interpretted as a sign of cooling. So why is it shown in the WMO report as an unprecedented warming? As you properly discuss in your papers we just do not know how exactly do the tree rings relate to weather. In my understanding we are left with the following options:
1) The calibrations of the rings to temperature prior to 1950 are biased, possibly due to the poor coverage of temperature stations.
2) Something other than the temperature influenced the trees in the last several decades and we do not know what.
In either case it is not very responsible to relate the curves to global climate as WMO has done. You are saying it, albeit somehow indirectly but pretty clearly, in all your papers. Unfortunately it appears that these are tooo long for WMO to read.
Ciao and greetings to everyone down there!
George
I think it’s fair to say that George Kukla was first to spot the Hide-the-Decline.
originally posted by: Semicollegiate
a reply to: Quetzalcoatl14
Calling the AGW folks Socialist/Communists might be imprecise, but it is not illogical.
The solutions to AGW are all governmentally based. That means progressive by definition, because the progressives use government to solve all of their problems.
Progressive, collectivist, communist, socialist are all more the same than different. They are like different types of secular Christianity. Holy book and everything.
A person marching for a governmental solution to, anything, is a socialist collectivist progressive.
originally posted by: macman
a reply to: Quetzalcoatl14
While truth is offensive, it shall still stand.
The weekend is not exactly a time for most to relax.
And it is soooo fantastic the UN leader took time away from his "busy" UN schedule to talk about this.
And comparing this BS to civil rights is about as offensive as it gets.
Those participating in the march spoke volumes.
originally posted by: Quetzalcoatl14
No, that is also a blanket generality.
There are number of solutions, ranging from private sector to government.
As to the international community, yes, governments and multi-lateral orgs have to and are addressing it. What do you think, that San Francisco or Chevron are going to magically address a global challenge?
originally posted by: Semicollegiate
a reply to: Quetzalcoatl14
Calling the AGW folks Socialist/Communists might be imprecise, but it is not illogical.
The solutions to AGW are all governmentally based. That means progressive by definition, because the progressives use government to solve all of their problems.
Progressive, collectivist, communist, socialist are all more the same than different. They are like different types of secular Christianity. Holy book and everything.
A person marching for a governmental solution to, anything, is a socialist collectivist progressive.
The wealthy American oil family Rockefeller puts no more money in fossil fuels. Together with with other organizations The Rockefellers are cutting interests with $ 50 billion, because they see no future in the oil and coal industries anymore.
The Rockefellers have joined a campaign in which more than 800 investors are involved. These include universities, cities, churches and health organizations.
"If John were alive today, he would invest in clean energy," say the descendants of John D. Rockefeller, whose as an oil pioneer earned billions.
originally posted by: Cynic
Of the thousands that marched I have but one simple question of them.
How many drove to the protest?
I think we already know the answer.............