It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
DarksideOz
reply to post by dragonridr
So now you know what research I have done and who I have listened to ?
I have based my own theory on the thoughts and findings of MANY people, so please do not think you have me all worked out based on an online conversation. You will dismiss any thought or possibility I put forward, which only suggests that you have already made up you mind on a subject and refuse to accept any notion of your personal decision being wrong.
I am happy to discuss the topic with you, but not if you want to go down that road.
dragonridr
DarksideOz
reply to post by dragonridr
So now you know what research I have done and who I have listened to ?
I have based my own theory on the thoughts and findings of MANY people, so please do not think you have me all worked out based on an online conversation. You will dismiss any thought or possibility I put forward, which only suggests that you have already made up you mind on a subject and refuse to accept any notion of your personal decision being wrong.
I am happy to discuss the topic with you, but not if you want to go down that road.
Then your interpretations are wrong on sumerian and need to do further research. Please show us all these miracles in sumerian which text? There is no mention of any of this in Sumerian other than stichens wrong interpretation. So if you didnt get it from him were you just making stuff up then?
Yes. So what? Myths get handed down. That's the way it works.
Yet the story of Adamu was around long before the story of Adam.
Nice rant but you said this earlier:
This is some of the mentalities I'm dealing with here !
You will also see many references to genetic engineering and references to DNA.
DarksideOz
dragonridr
DarksideOz
reply to post by dragonridr
So now you know what research I have done and who I have listened to ?
I have based my own theory on the thoughts and findings of MANY people, so please do not think you have me all worked out based on an online conversation. You will dismiss any thought or possibility I put forward, which only suggests that you have already made up you mind on a subject and refuse to accept any notion of your personal decision being wrong.
I am happy to discuss the topic with you, but not if you want to go down that road.
Then your interpretations are wrong on sumerian and need to do further research. Please show us all these miracles in sumerian which text? There is no mention of any of this in Sumerian other than stichens wrong interpretation. So if you didnt get it from him were you just making stuff up then?
Please tell me HOW my interpretations are wrong instead of just saying they are. Are they wrong because they don't agree with YOUR interpretations. That seems to be a common flaw with you !
If you haven't seen these things while researching the Sumerians, then please don't make a fool of yourself by telling others to do more research. If you do not believe in what I am suggesting as a possibility, then fine, move on and find someone else to play this game with. I am happy to discuss the topic, but I refuse to play the ATS game of tit-for-tat when an open minded discussion would be better for all. You have closed your mind to this topic, so please tell me how we are supposed to have an intelligent discussion ?
Sit 2 people down with one being a devout religious follower, and the other being a devout believer in the evolution theory. If both of those people refuse to and entertain the possibility that the other person may have a credible point, then both will walk away frustrated. But if both people enter the discussion with an open mind, then both will probably walk away feeling better, and more enlightened from the experience. See how a completely different outcome can come from the same event. Now apply that to other theories outside of what YOU choose to believe in !
If you are not going to open your mind to this subject, then please discuss it with someone else who will accept that behaviour !
Perhaps you can share your research. On which 6,000 year old tablet do you see references to genetic engineering and references to DNA?
Does it mean that all of my research that I have done is wrong because you can't see it, or possibly interpret it in another way ?
No less believable than God making everything. There is quite a bit of evidence for the scientific version. Not so much for Sitchin's version.
Tell me how what I am suggesting is any less believable than the religious and scientific versions of human origin ?
Actually, I haven't said that it did not and cannot happen. I just asked you for those "many examples" you talk about. Which 6,000 year old texts contain those references?
Have I even once during this conversation said that the theory I suggest I is 100% fact or DID happen ? Yet I have several people telling me, based only on their personal opinion, that it did NOT and CANNOT happen.
...it could also just be religious fear mongering. Be good or God will get you, and your kids, and your kids' kids.
BUT - what was observed was not just the appearance of inherited traits but also, the disappearance of non-beneficial inherited traits. That's epigenetics.
...this has gone way, way off topic.
Phage
reply to post by DarksideOz
Perhaps you can share your research. On which 6,000 year old tablet do you see references to genetic engineering and references to DNA?
Does it mean that all of my research that I have done is wrong because you can't see it, or possibly interpret it in another way ?
No less believable than God making everything. There is quite a bit of evidence for the scientific version. Not so much for Sitchin's version.
Tell me how what I am suggesting is any less believable than the religious and scientific versions of human origin ?
Actually, I haven't said that it did not and cannot happen. I just asked you for those "many examples" you talk about. Which 6,000 year old texts contain those references?
Have I even once during this conversation said that the theory I suggest I is 100% fact or DID happen ? Yet I have several people telling me, based only on their personal opinion, that it did NOT and CANNOT happen.
etcsl.orinst.ox.ac.uk...edit on 2/8/2014 by Phage because: (no reason given)
You ask me to produce where it is said on the tablets, but I have been trying to tell you that that it isn't spelt out in bold direct fashion where one can see or read it as definite proof.
Phage
reply to post by DarksideOz
You ask me to produce where it is said on the tablets, but I have been trying to tell you that that it isn't spelt out in bold direct fashion where one can see or read it as definite proof.
No. I asked you which tablets.
If you told us which tablets we may be able to discuss interpretations.
edit on 2/13/2014 by Phage because: (no reason given)