Careful With That Axe, Eugene
Viewing the two theories side by side you can see more clearly the major differences. The dirty snowball theory (let’s continue calling using the
shorter DST) considers comets as primordial chunks of frozen water molecules and bits left over from the formation of our solar system. According to
this theory comets come from the Ort Cloud, a very cold scrap yard or periphery area of tailings on the outer reaches of our solar system surrounding
the planets and our Sun and about 50,000 times farther from the Sun than Earth. DST tells us comets heat up as they come closer to the sun with
volatile substances (such as CO2) streaming off of the comet body or nucleus to become the tail we see. But ask yourself, if this were so why then are
not the icy moons of Saturn and Jupiter burnt dry by the sun? Let’s look at some of these facts explainable using the EC model but unexplainable
#1 Observed fact problem for DST:
ISON became extremely bright far beyond Jupiter’s orbit December 2012. It should NOT have done that according to DST! Scientists have largely
accepted the fact ISON may be far more solid than DST allows. (NB DST explains that ISON has never ventured near our Sun before and therefore has an
abundance of volatile gases still present, but that explanation relies on the awful big assumption that ISON has never ventured out of the Ort cloud
before now, a circular argument fitting a little too well with the whole Ort Cloud model determining it to be the source of comets)
#2 Observed fact problem for DST:
DST cannot explain why some asteroids appear to ‘vent gases’ just like comets do. EC explains this because it determines comets and asteroids are
basically the same thing. In fact, just some days earlier a “never-before-seen” asteroid was photographed “with six comet-like tails”!!
"I'm trying not to use the word 'freak,'" said David Jewitt of UCLA and lead author of a paper about the six-tailed asteroid, "but that's what it is.
It is definitely freakish."
The EC model explained this phenomenon back in 2006, and noted that DST attempted to explain these as “dirty snowballs in disguise”. There you go,
when the theory doesn’t fit the facts it seems facts can be made to fit the theory as Einstein commented with intended irony in his now famous
#3 Observed fact problem for DST:
DST cannot explain the rapidity and magnitude of the brightening of ISON.
On November 28 of this year, ISON will lie closest to the Sun — a scant 680,000 miles (1.1 million kilometers) from its surface. Latest predictions
indicate that it will peak at magnitude –4.5, equivalent to the brightness of Venus.
But ISON’s brightening came far earlier and brighter than expected. See the graph of ISON's V-Magnitude vs Photometer Diameter
“For a 60,000 km diameter V-mag = 6.34
- I have highlighted the magnitude in the quoted data. This chart is a couple of days old already. Look on the site for the updated one, and note the
brightness of this comet is not jiving with DTS at all.
It is so bright now that astronomers believe it should surely fragment like so many others subjected to the heat of the Sun at close proximity (hot
tea into cold cup, that kind of analogy). And yet despite many reports of ISON reaching some pre-fragmentation state indicated in part by its rapid
increase in brightness it is NOT fragmenting. BTW DST cannot account for why comets split like this, particularly the velocity of the fragmentation
when it happens which is some 20% of the forward momentum of the comet itself. Sagan had something to say about that.
Back to the sudden outburst let's return to the latest report by Bruce Gary HERE
Nov 20, 20.8 UT: Added Nov 20 Whitmer G filter images & analysis. V-mag total ~ 4.1, so comet continues to brighten without breaking-up. Side jets
(emphasis has been added to the quote)
The EC model explains what to DST followers is simply unexplainable. Silverlok has already noted the following on the other thread and I will
acknowledge such here. reply to post by Silverlok
Ison changed two orders of magnitude in visibility in less than 24hours, there is NO WAY THAT COULD HAPPEN in a gradient thermal environment...the
cause HAS TO be magnetic and electromagnetic. The most probable scenario is that Ison ( glowing green and already identified as carbon emitting )is
acting , as Tesla said , a perfect conductor in the near perfect vacuum of space and is a massive chunk of carbon in either the form of diamond or
#4 Observed fact problem for DST:
November 18 ISON again stumped DST by suddenly fading suggesting the outburst would not continue but was instead over.
Nov 18, 14.8 UT: Cloudy in our area, so no new images or mag's. Note yesterday's puzzling finding that the comet faded! The outburst may be over,
which is puzzling.
Now, I can’t make anything of this one but I included it for the sake of some completeness. I am sure someone will bring it up and hopefully they
will offer an explanation. Either from the EC or DST model, or even something different would be okay. What we need here is a rational and logical
explanation for this anomaly.
And not only but also -
Recent detailed images of comet surfaces by space vehicles show comets look little different to asteroids. They are extensively cratered, and that is
not at all what is expected of something a snowball. They exhibit NO vents, again not expected by a model describing gas vented from the nucleus.
There are many other facts that have been discovered in these close encounters with comets by NASA’s stardust and Deep impact that undermine the DST
model while supporting the EC model. The short PDF linked to above and the video I embedded above this post provide many such examples and more
satisfying explanations than what I could possibly briefly set out in this OP.
The EC model is a component of the concept of EU, and so our Sun is also electric. There is no end to it really. Once the Electric Universe model is
accepted then everything changes, from the way we look at comets to our understanding of the Sun, the way galaxies relate to each other, and even
lightening on our very own planet Earth. There is no long-term advantage to be had in attempting to silence those busily pointing out the emperor is
wearing no clothes. ISON is doing that for the EC theory right now. Those who resist the facts that images of ISON and the comets and other data from
them reveal are simply swimming against the tide.
Continued in final post below.
edit on 20-11-2013 by Tallone because: (no reason given)