It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Mikeultra
WAYNOS
If it's a matter of exhaust gases, then I won't argue with that. Toxic exhaust is an issue with any kind of combustion process, including aircraft engines, but those toxins are not anything to do with the trail, they are present all the time the aircraft is under power, the one saving grace of airliner engines is! I suppose, that they only combust about 10% of the air that passes through them to generate thrust! I don't know of any other combustion power source that can claim that.
This might be the answer I'm looking for. Only 10% of the air passing through these new high bypass engines? The spray nozzles are located inside the engine cowlings behind the fan blades. The chemical substance is therefore released into the 90% of airflow that is not injected into the engines. That theory now eliminates the argument that engine wear would result from a fuel additive. Although I still think that is also possible with sub-micron sized particles. So it's possible there are separate "substance tanks" in the wings near the engines, that feed the nozzles located in the engine cowlings. GE probably has these nozzles mislabeled as harmless h2o. This would explain the switch over to these ridiculously large new engine types!
Sorry waynos, I don't know how to use the quote system exactly right yet.
1. Solidly define what is a chemtrail (i.e. chemical composition, shape, color, etc.); 2. Solidly define who is responsible for a chemtrail (pilots, specific craft, suppliers, etc.); 3. Solidly define when are chemtrails present (i.e., time, date, etc.) 4. Solidly define where chemtrails are present (i.e., atmospheric conditions, height, etc.)
Mikeultra
network dude
reply to post by Mikeultra
Great! and if that's the case, then we should be hearing from engine mechanics all over the world exposing the chemtrail phenomenon. Oh, wait, nobody is doing that.
How about first, try to figure out IF there is anything being sprayed before you start to worry about HOW it's happening.
Not if the engine manufacturers have included service manuals that have these nozzles identified as some benign h2o doo-dad for clearing soot from inside the cowling. Along with labeling these nozzles as such. Then there is self preservation on the part of the mechanics. If they start asking questions, they might find themselves without a job. Or worse they might just disappear! The economy isn't doing so well these days, so loose lips sink ships is the order of the day for anyone getting uppity under the cowlings.
1992 is when the whole world got together and conspired to do evil together!
Korg Trinity
Jab0rnal
Korg Trinity
As of yet I have not seen a shred of evidence that could disprove the theory.
Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. It is not up to people to disprove something that may or may not exist, regardless of topic. It is up to you, the believer, who has passion and belief in the topic to present undeniable proof that your extraordinary claim is real. Making your argument unbunkable is one way to sway the disbelieving in favour of your topic.edit on 13/11/2013 by Jab0rnal because: (no reason given)
I think you must have misread my post.
I'm asking for those that attempt to debunk the Chemtrail theory to put their money where their mouths are... and fess up their reasoning as to a HOAX.
For if Chemtrails are not a reality then it is a HOAX... if it is a hoax then there is or are people involved in making the hoax.
I'm simply asking who and why...
Can you see where I am coming from?
Korg.
InhaleExhale
reply to post by Mikeultra
1992 is when the whole world got together and conspired to do evil together!
So what was or is your part?
The whole world? I must been off planet at the time.
nergalbanda1
reply to post by Mikeultra
Your list of countries is NOT the whole world by the way; You DO realize that yes? Last I checked there were more then 41 countries in the world.
edit on 11 06 13 by nergalbanda1 because: added a sentance
For if Chemtrails are not a reality then it is a HOAX... if it is a hoax then there is or are people involved in making the hoax.
luxordelphi
reply to post by Korg Trinity
First: your questions are posed assuming that the hoax is chemtrails. The hoax is actually outrageously persistent contrails. No such thing exists or has ever existed.
1992 is when the whole world got together and conspired to do evil together! It's the United Nations master plan of destruction. Agenda 21 and sustainability, no more cars for anyone. You walk or ride a bike! Weather modification is in there, and putting crap in the air is a big part of the plan. Population control is a big part of it too. Crap=chem-trails. I don't know why chem-trails is treated like a dirty word...
InhaleExhale
Korg Trinity
Jab0rnal
Korg Trinity
As of yet I have not seen a shred of evidence that could disprove the theory.
Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. It is not up to people to disprove something that may or may not exist, regardless of topic. It is up to you, the believer, who has passion and belief in the topic to present undeniable proof that your extraordinary claim is real. Making your argument unbunkable is one way to sway the disbelieving in favour of your topic.edit on 13/11/2013 by Jab0rnal because: (no reason given)
I think you must have misread my post.
I'm asking for those that attempt to debunk the Chemtrail theory to put their money where their mouths are... and fess up their reasoning as to a HOAX.
For if Chemtrails are not a reality then it is a HOAX... if it is a hoax then there is or are people involved in making the hoax.
I'm simply asking who and why...
Can you see where I am coming from?
Korg.
Are you one of the who and why?
Like debunkers get accused and asked countless times, are you being paid to push the Chemtrail theory?