Lt. Col. Michael Aquino Admits To "UFO" Technology Cover-Up [Whistleblower Testimony]

How do we come to love monsters? We look in the mirror and seek to redeem ourselves.

“I’m not a Nazi-- but they had some style.”

“I’m not a fascist-- I’m a National Socialist.”

“I don’t lie-- it’s just that nothing is true.”

Elementary ethics, straight from my Eagle Scout uncle, and backed up by a 3rd degree (yeah, it turns out there is such a thing, it’s just ultra rare) Eagle Scout I am honored to count amongst my friends:

*Duty to God
*Duty to Others
*Duty to Self

In that order.

Some define God as the collective Good, the zero-point where all of the connections that bind one human to another become a vast luminous web. I am not you, and you are not me. Our interests may not coincide. But we are all part of that web, and it would be dimmed if one of our nodes should go null, calcifying in isolation, howling in the Trench.

There are bonds that run like bright quicksilver, or like coursing blood; deep within the collective fundament. Those connections persist beyond their terminus, and they have nothing to do with control or predation.

A cell that refuses apoptosis is cancerous: it prolongs its own duration at the expense of the body proper, and perishes with the whole when it finally falters.

Sidenote: if you no longer know when you are lying, you fool no one but yourself.

I see you've been busy since I signed out last night! Plenty o' double-speak, and a good smattering of self backslapping, in those various replies. Gracious! You should add Order of the Weasel to your vitae. Don't get me wrong: I probably have done enough work here and there in the, ahem, past to have at least earned a weasel badge myself.

Your facility for spin isn't, imo, world-class. That's arguably a good thing. I don't think psyops is your strong suit, although I think you do fairly well at anything you put your mind to. Poet/philosopher seems a much better fit and I see brilliance there, but I think the military dropped that pay grade somewhere along the way.

Speaking of clumsy:

Basically SRI and the government were made [taxpayer-expensive] fools of by pranksters or scamsters with some knowledge of related areas of stage magic. It's not all difficult.

As opposed to the new spin:

No, I'd say he's an audience of persons who are either intentional pretenders [for whatever their motives - money, publicity, fun, etc.] or innocently naïve true-believers.

I'd say that sitting on the board of directors of a company that takes money for remote viewing services would, by YOUR own words and assessment of remote viewing, put such a person somewhere in your category of "fools of by pranksters or scamsters."

Yes, but I am a professional, not an amateur or free-lancer. I do it on behalf of the United States. FYI The iron law of US PSYOP, applicable to all Departments and Agencies, is the Smith-Mundt Act, which prohibits any PSYOP against American citizens. In these days where it's increasingly difficult to constrain the targeting of any information, it's that much more of a challenge to implement, but it continues to be the 500-lb canary in the room for professional PSYOPers.

Note that I said "professionals". There are a lot of BS artists in the government whose credentials and job descriptions are not officially/formally PSYOP, and who probably haven't even heard of Smith-Mundt. Can't help you there!

The truth is that as a soldier you do what you are told generally.

Psy-Ops and the General

One soldier did speak against it to his credit. Is the Smith-Mundt still under attack, btw?

Also, I must note that you do propose in MindWar various um, let's call them "persuasive techniques" to be used here at home as well. Although I admit the stated philosophy in MW is fairly sweet and gentle in many ways.

I look forward to contrasting some of your writings and philosophies from the magik realm with the stated philosophies in MindWar.

I never violate classified information, period. My citizenship loyalty is to the United States…..

And Set/Satan, lets don't leave him/them out.

…and my moral loyalty is to my own conscience and standard of ethics - which haven't changed since I became an Eagle Scout in 1961.

Which is a rather opaque statement actually. Charles Whitman and Ted Bundy were Eagle Scouts, too. But I'm jus' yanking your chain a lil' there Baron and make no true comparison. Jus' somewhat affectionately goofing' at ya.

I'll probably have the time a little later today to make some good progress in MindWar. I look forward to discussing it with you.

reply to post by maquino



Well yes it's most unfortunate that poor old Set is so badly misrepresented by some silly cult that would rather quote Plato and American popular culture gurus than properly research and represent his tradition, i mean you quote Wallis Budge as your source material, mention that name to contemporary Egyptologists they roll about laughing.

So if it was all just an excuse to get down and dirty in the mud and make out like the Hippos then fine, throw in rape, murder and sprinkle liberally with nihilistic tendencies and that at least would be appropriate behaviour for true minions of Set...but ethics!

ZetaRediculian


What I get out of this is that essentially this "church" and "psyops" employ the same sort of hocus pocus or magic trick which is his general theme.

Dont you think that Christianity and Islam are the greatest "psyops" ever inflicted on mankind?
And as for Christianity, doesnt the very worship of "Jesus" take worship away from the "one true god" regardless of the name you give that god?

With regards to a "one god" and a "prince of darkness".
If there is but one god, then 1 of 2 things is true.

Satan/Lucifer/Baal/Set/Beelzebub/Mephisto etc etc is either a creation of the one god, or IS the one god.
We gain empathy and understanding of the spritual realities through suffering.
Evil was not a mistake by an infallible god. Before the universe becomes one with the singularity that is the one god, it must get to the duality which is prevalent throughout the universe...
light vs darkness, good vs evil, ying and yang, left and right, individualism vs socialism, positive vs negative, male and female, bad moods and good moods.
If we are made in the image of god, then wouldnt that suggest that many of our failings are also prevalent in the one god?
I believe that the HELL we call earth is a crash course in suffering to advance our higher understandings and spiritual evolution.
This is all of course just the opinion of a person that has spent far too much time trying to understand that which is not understandable while in deep thought under the influence of a plant that must remain unnamed.
Give me a few years and will probably have a completely different view altogether. But hey, thats life.

Back to psyops....
What better subservient slave than one that imprisons himself with dogmas and promises of salvation or fear of damnation/persecution?


And back on topic, I would like to ask Michael, did you ever know John Todd, and can you shed some light on the whole "demonic" nature of some UFO's.

The GUT
I see you've been busy since I signed out last night! Plenty o' double-speak, and a good smattering of self backslapping, in those various replies. Gracious! You should add Order of the Weasel to your vitae. Don't get me wrong: I probably have done enough work here and there in the, ahem, past to have at least earned a weasel badge myself.

Your facility for spin isn't, imo, world-class. That's arguably a good thing. I don't think psyops is your strong suit, although I think you do fairly well at anything you put your mind to. Poet/philosopher seems a much better fit and I see brilliance there, but I think the military dropped that pay grade somewhere along the way.

This clumsy attempt at gratuitous insult fails to impress me, and only makes me wonder why you feel so compelled to be obnoxious. I don't recall attempting to insult or otherwise provoke you.

I'd say that sitting on the board of directors of a company that takes money for remote viewing services would, by YOUR own words and assessment of remote viewing, put such a person somewhere in your category of "fools of by pranksters or scamsters."

Say what you like; as previously, John and I agree on some things, disagree on others. You have a bone to pick with him, go pick it yourself.

The truth is that as a soldier you do what you are told generally.

Only within the law, as per the "Nürnberg Principle" discussed in MindWar. As elaborated therein, there is a perennial problem of prerogative/responsibility to determine lawfulness, and of course whether there are ethics that should trump law. You'll see all that discussion in the book, and my best-possible response to it. There's no simple solution.

Is the Smith-Mundt still under attack, btw?

S-M has been under attack, or just attempts to evade it, since the day it was passed. What's really important is the basic sense of personal morality and integrity in the PSYOP community, and that's a much larger issue that goes to the heart of our cultural and educational system generally. Another reason why I brought Raghavan Iyer into MW.

Charles Whitman and Ted Bundy were Eagle Scouts, too. But I'm jus' yanking your chain a lil' there Baron and make no true comparison. Jus' somewhat affectionately goofing' at ya.

MY BSA experience was in the Eisenhower/JFK era when it was still very Norman Rockwell. If you miss that metaphor, the recent movie "Pleasantville" should suffice. In my case it stuck, which makes me something of an anachronism, or in Paul Kantner's words "naïve idealist", in the cynicism and alienation of today's society.

Turnabout: I've decided that Charlie Chan is too mild for you. I think we should upgrade you to Dr. Fu Manchu.

reply to post by maquino


Charlie Chan, Fu Manchu, fat boy, dumb-chip, insulter of Set's lap dog, revealer of sneaky hypocrites…I will answer to just about anything.

I truly hope you don't take any of it too very personal. I do have some affection for you. My goal isn't your psyche, but a vetting. You'll note that I have quite a few nice and sincere things to say about you, and MindWar, along the way, too.

Vetting because, get real, Michael, you're on ATS and many of us here are naturally going to question you in light of your associations both military and occult. We have good and sound reason for that, and some 3rd grade child psychology-ops are seldom enough to throw us completely off task or focus.

Real men don't whine…they defend their positions. If they're able. Also, you seem to assume the role of "teacher" and come across as extremely self-centered. I can't think of one thing here that you've referred to, thus far, that's not conceptually old hat to most of us.

Part of the reason I'm going to be tough on you is because I do find aspects of your soul to be rather naively sweet. I wanna believe, in a Pleasantville kind of way, that you mean those things. It affects me and, as such, I must determine it's sincerity and/or veracity. You fancy yourself a warrior, don't sniffle when you meet others.

Pleasantville Eagle Scout and someone who thinks the Church of Satan didn't go far enough is, however, somewhat hard to collate and resolve.

Anton LaVey, Unidentified "Altar" and LaVey's Daughter Zeena, Former Priestess of Temple of Set

Would you want your daughter to grow up and become an altar or priestess and to "accept" the "things" that role often requires? I'd really like a coherent answer on that one. Are you prepared to discuss it?

Those sweet things you say about abolishing physical war (PW) seem to stand in contrast to some of your "will to power" occult writings (now THAT will make an interesting discussion!) If a psyops guy proposes a manual for "mind war" I suggest that to plumb the depths of who he is--at core--is just as much a public service as you proffer MW to be.

I'd hazard a guess that ATS will be by far the most public exposure that MindWar gets. Threads like this, and certainly the book review thread I plan, will top Google on any search. So try and continue to be gracious about the vetting that comes your way by any of us here. That's my sincere advice.

Will the real Michael Aquino please stand up?

corsair00
reply to post by ImpactoR

 

Well just to give you more food for thought on the Interdimensional aspect. I can't spend too much time on this right now, so it will be sloppy and incomplete. But evidence suggests that species are connected via a morphogenetic field, likely through the DNA, which can account for how entire flocks of birds move at the exact same instant etc. A species-wide connection. In the fossil record, it has been shown that new species, or new traits, emerge quite suddenly. This again is probably related to the DNA and also wildcard in-fluxes of very high levels of cosmic rays etc. At some point our early human ancestors suddenly hit some critical mass and hooked-up into a radically new form of consciousness, which gave us religious, philosophical and artistic ideas. Many postulate that our encounter with psychedelic plants or fungi is what sparked this connection. Either way, this species-wide field of energy or connection, imprinting our DNA, is what proliferated this radical new form of consciousness in humans - worldwide, at the same time. The so-called 100th monkey effect.

The imagination, then, is actually a deployed field of energy that exists outside of the brain, but is likely filtered in through the pineal gland. So I am trying to set the groundwork for the notion of collective fields and what the Swiss psychologist, Carl Gustav Jung, called "the collective unconscious". That there is a collective human unconscious where mythic images spring up in different cultures, as well as individual's dreams at night time and in daydreams or spiritual epiphanies. All different cultures have their own particular flavor and brand of spiritual images or archetypes. Only in modern times have we been so disconnected from our past spirituality that we are twisting in the wind and holding on to essentially unworkable religions and ideologies. They don't spark that connection in our mind/spirit any longer - for the most part.

So isn't it interesting that along in the 20th Century, as we are achieving space flight of our own and advancing more technologically, a new vision - this time of highly-advanced space beings - should emerge in the minds of our science-fiction writers, artists and every day citizens? Carl Jung wrote about the "flying saucers" as being a spontaneous, new archetype or mythology that is being born out of this collective field - the collective unconscious of the human species itself. It changes, morphs, evolves and adapts like a cosmic dream, and can actually create a "reality" of its own. This may involve REAL physical beings - either from the future or another timeline or planet - who knows? But the idea that John Alexander, Jacques Vallee, Carl Jung, Terence McKenna, Graham Hancock, John Mack etc etc give more credence to is this Interdimensional/Mythical notion I have clumsily tried to elucidate for you.

edit on 23-9-2013 by corsair00 because: (no reason given)

I think there's a lot of merit and truth in what you describe here, but I also think the basic idea of this has been warped by the overall psyops present, not just in this country, but internationally, as well, though it may have begun here, with the military industrial complex. The warping, I believe, is in the idea that real beings, as you say, may present, or manifest, because enough has come from the collective unconscious to make it so. I find this to be a post modernistic extension of concepts that reality is relevant to what enough wish it to be, to make it so.

I don't believe this to be true. However, I do believe that we live in a managed reality, but do not believe it is achieved in this way. That concept is really just a way to blame people for what they are living through, or an extension of it, so that the planners of a managed reality or consciousness can escape any blame for it or lay the blame where they wish to. JMHO.
Tetra50

The GUT

K-PAX-PROT
So the thousands of people reporting contact.abductions from "Greys" and the revelations from sources like Whitley Striebier in books like "Communion" are just victims of a mass "PsyOp" agenda???

Not necessarily. But hold on a minute, K-Pax. We shouldn't discount that as an aspect, because there's a great deal of evidence for just such an involvement.

I certainly have a lot to weigh in on here, and I hope to do quite a bit of that tonight. I'm excited about the prospect for great conversation.

My first response--and those to follow--are certainly in no way indicative of order of import, but I will start with K-Pax just to throw some soylent green (food) out for thought:

The word "meme" is a rather new word, but the concept itself is ancient. Certainly not unfamiliar to the PSYOP/Social Engineering cadre.

A meme (/ˈmiːm/; meem)[1] is "an idea, behavior, or style that spreads from person to person within a culture."[2] A meme acts as a unit for carrying cultural ideas, symbols, or practices that can be transmitted from one mind to another through writing, speech, gestures, rituals, or other imitable phenomena. Supporters of the concept regard memes as cultural analogues to genes in that they self-replicate, mutate, and respond to selective pressures.[3]

The word meme is a shortening (modeled on gene) of mimeme (from Ancient Greek μίμημα Greek pronunciation: [míːmɛːma] mīmēma, "imitated thing", from μιμεῖσθαι mimeisthai, "to imitate", from μῖμος mimos "mime")[4] and it was coined by the British evolutionary biologist Richard Dawkins in The Selfish Gene (1976)[1][5] as a concept for discussion of evolutionary principles in explaining the spread of ideas and cultural phenomena. Examples of memes given in the book included melodies, catch-phrases, fashion, and the technology of building arches.[6]

en.wikipedia.org...

It is absolutely INDEED possible that Whitley Streiber--as well as Barney & Betty Hill and other Contactees/Abductees--were "infected" as it were with a "mind virus." One that malignantly spread throughout ufology/society.

Are you familiar, K, with the literature that connects the Hills (and other contactees as mentioned by ultimaFule) with psyops/intelligence personnel? It's a very important scarlet ribbon that demands both investigation and an open mind. Time and TIME AGAIN we see the heavy hand of the intel boys muddying the waters. Take heed.

The following is a decent start:

The UFO contactee movement was led by people that worked hand-in-hand with the CIA; the abductee scenario was created by CIA personnel. It reveals an intriguing alternative universe of the contactee and abductee phenomenon.

The Pied Pipers of the CIA

Looking forward to more conversation with ultimaFule, meaningles333, maquino, corsair00, and my brudda-from-another-Queen mother: FireMoon.

edit on 23-9-2013 by The GUT because: (no reason given)

Sorry, I'm just catching up, but this was something I wanted to post, as well, and as usual, many of the same things seem to occur to me as they do to you, Gut. Yes, the meme issue, and the psyops/intelligence involvement over and over begs the question, after a while.

But this is a much convoluted, yet, perhaps, the heart of the issue, here....and will take steady plowing through to get to.

And btw, with the last pic you posted of Lavay and child, I have a post ready to respond, but am just waiting for the moment when I finish the middle of the thread, now having read the end, the beginning....LOL

However, I just can't help pre-empting myself here, even, for I would very much like to know Mr. Aquino's take on M.K. Ultra and Monarch Projects......especially, vis a vis the pic you posted, Gut, as this is a very large part of the creation of the "meme," and perhaps, why it was necessary, and alludes directly to motives by those in power, and their psyops. Until such is confronted, I believe, there can be no real truth about the UFO phenomenon, and no end, therefore, to the hijacking of the human, individual mind. I am waiting to take that concept on with Mr. Aquino until I have read every post, for I do not believe this to be an "ethical" pursuit at all: making war less bloody, and less obvious in this way, through the mind. Perhaps it even worse, and I have to laugh (or cry) at the whole concept and the mention of ethics......,together.

Tetra50

reply to post by Eidolon23

A cell that refuses apoptosis is cancerous: it prolongs its own duration at the expense of the body proper, and perishes with the whole when it finally falters.

Sidenote: if you no longer know when you are lying, you fool no one but yourself.

I have to say, I am surprised at your estimations here, Eidolon. Usually I agree with you. But here, not so much. For, the whole mindwar concept is geared for one to not know their own mind, nor experiences....so why so judgemental about fooling no one but yourself, I wonder?

As to a cell that refuses apoptosis and is cancerous...that really isn't how cancer happens at all. Cells don't have a choice. They are reacting through and with myriad stimuli beyond their control. As for the metaphor of people who refuse to die, as to those cells, and becoming cancerous, I know I would gladly die if it would free anyone from cancer or continued pain, and think most others would, too. If we are still here, then, someone, something, some bigger entity, must want it so...and hopefully, not to cause a cancer on our species.
Tetra50

The GUT

zetarediculian
this is really fascinating stuff. I look forward to hearing more about this aspect. I do believe that this is a possible scenario but is there any other "mind virus" examples besides the alien one?

Just off the top of my head some of the Monarch programming stuff--and other "mind-control" memes--come to immediate mind, but I don't want to get too far off-topic here and admittedly this particular example isn't proven. The preponderance of evidence just so happens to lie in the ufological realm. This might make a good question for Col. Aquino, now that you mention it...would he give us a straight answer?

In the above Monarch example, certain memes can be traced that seem designed to make MKULTRA (and more specifically "Project Artichoke') goals sound crazy and to further produce a certain amount of craziness into our society thereby obfuscating governmental complicity.

One of the Artichoke hypnotism experiments included a hypnotist telling a young male subject of how he used hypnotism to score with attractive young ladies thereby stoking the sexuality of his subject prior to the subjects own hypnotism and subsequent lessons. Hypnosis "victim" then became victimizer and was used to compromise/confuse other targets.

We also have knowledge/evidence that the MKULTRA cadre used hypnotism on female "agents" who would then be used to sleep with targets for intelligence objectives.

By using a Cathy O'Brien to (probably unwittingly) spread far-fetched Monarch tales, the intelligence community is able to make facts such as the above sound "crazy." In the process, the meme creates a whole subculture of folk who think they are "Monarch Slaves."

PM me and I'll give you some links that I think you will find interesting.

edit on 23-9-2013 by The GUT because: (no reason given)

Okay, posting here, admittedly not having finished the last two pages of middle thread....but "not having been proven?" Really? Should I provide a list of declassified documents and testimony before senate committees, really? Sorry, I'm just stunned, here.

Monarch may not have been proven, and truthfullly, more of what you're spouting here is Monarch in nature than Ultra, but not having been proven, when there are laws on the books as a result of senate testimony is striking me as truly agregious, for the attendant vicitims, used for such "research." This kills me daily, on this site, seeing these projects called into question, with lists of patents, research, laws having been passed, and senate testimony as a result....and what are you all about then here, revisionist, erasure history?
Tetra50

Why is it, when someone invokes Monarch or Ultra, they backpedal shamelessly, and say something like it has to be taken with a grain of salt, despite a plethora of friggin evidence? I am constantly amazed and think the conspiracy community has simply joined to DOD, whenever I hear or read such. You've got a guy here, wrote a book, military and admitted psyops operator, and he's telling you about the Church of Satan and Temple of Set that should have progressed further, and you're STILL saying these things about Ultra and Monarch?????

Jeez. It gets to be too much sometimes.

Interdimensional hypotheses but no remote viewing??? I think the problem may be ignorance was applied to the meme that didn't have it, and ever since, everyone trying their hardest to make it so.....
Respectfully, but questioning,
Tetra

reply to post by The GUT

AmberLeaf

The problem with space stuff is that it really is classified tighter than a crab's ass, so speculation runs wild. Pick up a copy of my 2013 _MindWar_ on Amazon to see just how real the Twilight Zone really is.

And Greer.......sad, how sad

Another old timer thinking of their retirement pension...making up bs to make money.

Lets be real, people who work with the super secret stuff NEVER talk. This is just entertainment badged up as real life.

So, I'm only on pg. 2 of the thread, though I've read pages 6-8.....I'm a backwards kinda gal, these days, it seems....but I gotta agree with AmberLeaf, here, at then end of this post. I don't think Lt.Col Aquina (hope I got your rank right), though you're retired, are you not?, would be talking on this forum if it weren't part and parcel of a continuing psyops/and/or publicity for a book. That's part and parcel of psyops 101, really. In fact, I'm of the belief that those who really know what's going on here aren't the Alexanders and Aquinos, but those who remain nameless to most of us, though perhaps not faceless....LOL, or even maskless...

Your take on RV, Mr. Aquino, as well as your ties with satanic occultism (forgive me if I'm wrong, I've yet to finish the thread, and will return with a more cogent reply when I have) and supposedly the Temple of Set, are just two or three of the things so far that give me pause.

Another is this "interdimensional hypothesis" thing. So, you believe in this, but not in remote viewing, for this seems at odds to me.

There's been a great deal of talk about ethics. I'd like to say something about ethics....it usually only applies to people who consider who they're dealing with equals. If not considered an equal, then it applies in the same manner as to how I feel about treating my pets. That's just some context for a powerful word being used here.

Though I've yet to finish the middle of the thread, I'd like to say this about what I think you mean as mind war, and defend as a way of bloodless war, as a path towards some kind of peace. Just because it is conducted and usurps the mind, does not make it any more civil, really, just less messy. Some of us happen to think the mind is the last bastion and sacred seat of freedom, vis a vis thought police. At least, I like to think I'm not the only one who thinks this. Though it may be less bloody, it is no less costly, deleterious or more ethical, than trenches and real combat on a front line. In fact, it strikes me it is far less ethical, for it allows for a plausible deniability factor in which someone who has war declared upon them, cannot prove what is happening to them, for it's "all in their mind," yet no less real to them, and no less deleterious.
Respectfully,
Tetra50

And, oh, yes, I finsihed the thread before posting.....

Yeah thanks, corsair....good thread, but I find it wholly to be a psyops in the making and happening; you wanna eat popcorn and watch the negative effects of that, so be it.....and that is why the human species will not make it for too much longer, or will live forever as slaves.....

So, Mr Aquino, I've offended every "friend," I perhaps, made here in my time, and would like to know what you think about what I said about ethics, being convenient when you are dealing with what you think of as "equals," and the Projects M.K. Ultra and Monarch......

It's becoming increasingly obvious to me, that even those who protesteth much, are really going along with a certain agenda, and though that agenda may look and be sold as "peace," it really isn't. It was brought up on this thread before me, but all anyone needs do is be well read in science fiction, classical literature and art, and put that all together....the agenda currently in progress become very obvious....

Tetra50

tetra50
Monarch may not have been proven, and truthfullly, more of what you're spouting here is Monarch in nature than Ultra...Why is it, when someone invokes Monarch or Ultra, they backpedal shamelessly, and say something like it has to be taken with a grain of salt...

Easy my dear tetra. I believe what can be PROVEN as per the MK-ULTRA conglomerate speaks for itself. What can be proven also counteracts the tons of purposefully seeded disinformation and opens new minds.

There are a certain amount of folk who have been psychologically affected by the memes. They turn out to be unfortunate tools of disinformation and make the whole subject sound loonville and do much harm.

That's why I disregarded the subject for so many years until I decided to do my very best to separate fact from fiction. What I found--as I alluded above--was sickening enough. And damning. Thusly will we open new--and important-to-the-cause-minds--to the reality of motive and human-use experimentation.

I don't need Cathy O'Brien's Monarch horror tales--valid or not--to know that we have factions within the intelligence community that will pervert both mankind and innocence. What I DID need when I finally decided to do deeper research was facts that could be proven. I found them.

On that subject, which may or may not have anything to do with Col. Aquino, I prefer to present research that broadens understanding and doesn't turn off the multitude that hasn't connected the dots as of yet. Okay? We need to reach a larger audience and presenting the unproven and speculative will NOT help. I'm not the enemy.

MK deserved a brief mention here because of, mainly, it's relationship to psyops, but a deeper discussion of the those issues might be better suited in a thread dedicated to that subject.

reply to post by tetra50

So, Mr Aquino, I've offended every "friend," I perhaps, made here

So we aren't friends then? Maybe a little point counter point sometime?

everything will be covered up about anything interesting

reply to post by The GUT


OK, I'm trying out easy and going smooth, here:

ultra=reason for meme=psyops on everyone=UFO and mind control.
Feel me?
Tetra

while what's underneath is wholly, friggin WORMS
Yeah, I'm one sided, sorry....but not really. that's my purpose here. And having said that, what, tell me, is ETHICAL, about friggin MINDWAR, and all that implies. Read my post about this, please. There is nothing whatsoever ethical about that endeavor...though, seemingly bloodless, I think the Navy yard shooting might convince others that it IS NOT TRULY BLOODLESS, but simply providing a plausible deniability about the blood being spilled....

reply to post by ZetaRediculian


I have to laugh: am i the " ignorant slut," or......
but, thanks for the laugh...
tetra50

The GUT
I truly hope you don't take any of it too very personal.

I never mind honest and courteous questions. I do not respond to insolence or rudeness, no matter how "cute" the individual feels it to be. Therefore any further postings of yours which cross this line I will simply ignore.