It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
No. I mean that, according to the article, the study does not really show that Bt toxin is toxic.
Once in a while. Seralini seems to make a habit of it though.
You probably don't know anything about mistakes though, do you? You don't make mistakes, you're phage.
That might have something to do with it never being published in any journal which any one reads. It doesn't seem to be anywhere but ISIS.
It's been close to a year since his bt toxins study was released, and as far as I can tell, no one has challenged it so far.
Are you saying Monsanto should handle all the infrastructure? Why? They don't have anything to do with the distribution and processing.
I still don't see how multi-billion dollar companies couldn't handle a bit of cleaning. Seems pretty easy, especially considering the amount of money they make in profit each year.
Because no matter who pays for it, it isn't easy or cheap to implement.
So what's your argument all about? If Monsanto doesn't have anything to do with distribution or processing, why do you continually use the excuse of distribution and processing as a reason for Monsanto shooting down bills?
I didn't say it did.
Originally posted by 3NL1GHT3N3D1
reply to post by Phage
My God... you are human!
So how does that one sentence disprove his whole study?