posted on Aug, 4 2013 @ 02:11 AM
I understand threads by people who are seeing UFO's and even more. And who are researching those who have. But the nonstop demeaning threads, just
seem like they're on an agenda. I'm an experiencer, and my family. My son has called me out to view crafts that were very low over the roof and vice
versa. And for choppers chasing them, crafts that he sensed, was connected to, knew when they were returning even though they were soundless and ones
I had greetings from. There is alot more but thats I'm all I'm going to say here. UFO's are real, and many people see them, and many have
experiences, some good and some not so good.
However, for those who haven't seen, and have no real interest in pursuing seeking, but just talk off the top of their head opinions that show a very
real lack of research and deep thinking, even psychopathy in my opinion because it means you don't understand people, aren't pro other people, don't
believe in them, even though some very credentialled folk have come forward, doesn't matter. It must lonely to distrust everyone in the world that
Most people aren't like that but a disappropiate amount online are. And they seem to dominate this category over the people who should be writing.
But they don't want to due to this.
And I don't know, it could be just a non issue, off the top of the person's head, but it just so happens to be on a huge issue of black op
information, suppressed from humanity due to all the murders and all the hidden tech that would be the end of the scarsity system and their dominion
over humanity. There would be no need to pretend anyone needs to starve in Africa, in Bangladesh, in Madagascar or anywhere on earth. There is no
need for mean harsh demonic systems. No they don't want it out. But....its off the top of some ones head that it's so painfully not an issue. Never
seen one, but can definitively say this and slam dunk everyone who has.
That or its an agenda, for that group that is suppressing this info. IMO most are on agenda.
edit on 4-8-2013 by Unity_99 because: (no