It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
I think your post shows that you already understand it.
that is an interesting idea... considering a third of the world is Christian yet there is a "narrow path"
Could you explain a little further?
When he says "works" he means the showy "Jewish" things that the Mosaic Law has in it that don't actually help anyone else, just your own pride in a false religiosity.
This is why I take issue with paul's idea of free grace...
Faith alone, free from work...
You also have to take into consideration what the word "justified" means. The definition is distorted by the Free Grace cultists because they define it as a legal declaration, where some hypothetical court pronounces a person to be "just".
So which law is he referring to?
Originally posted by Rex282
reply to post by LadyGreenEyes
Originally posted by jmdewey60
It is not Biblical that every sin requires that a person be put to death.
One example of someone not being killed for his sin is the murder of Abel by Cain, where is was actually a crime to kill him even thought it was known that he was guilty of murder.
So you are just making something up and then just saying it is "biblical", without giving any example from the Bible to show that is the case.It nowhere says that in the Bible.
Jesus, being God, died to pay the penalty for ALL sins, past, present, and future.
There is an Old Testament verse that says that sort of idea of substitutionary death does not work,
Ezekiel 18:20
The one who sins is the one who will die.edit on 13-7-2013 by jmdewey60 because: (no reason given)
Paul was comparing what the system of sin had to offer with what the system set up by God had to offer. He was not comparing debt with "payment" since both were about what you got, and not about what you somehow owe the system.
Romans 6:23 - "For the wages of sin is death; but the gift of God is eternal life through Jesus Christ our Lord."
If you want to disagree with the Word of God, that's between you and Him.
You were giving the Old Testament as an example. Where does it talk about eternal life in there?
This isn't about us putting anyone to death, but about eternal death. These are not the same thing.
Originally posted by Akragon
reply to post by SimonPeter
26 To declare, I say, at this time his righteousness: that he might be just, and the justifier of him which believeth in Jesus.
27 Where is boasting then? It is excluded. By what law? of works? Nay: but by the law of faith.
28 Therefore we conclude that a man is justified by faith without the deeds of the law.
So which law is he referring to?
IF it is this love which paul proclaims... wouldn't that be incorrect?
Originally posted by LadyGreenEyes
........................................
Pfffftttt! You have no idea about my salvation, nor what I believe. I disagree with you ,and that threatens you in some way, so you resort to lame personal attacks? No valid argument, eh?
You failed to address a single point I made. Go back, reread, and try again, or be ignored. I have better things to do.
Originally posted by Jennym964
Do you believe in the Holy Spirit? This is important.
Mat. 12:31 says, “Blasphemy against the Holy Ghost shall not be forgiven unto men.”
It's said that if you Blasphemy against the Father or the Son it can be forgiven, but not the Spirit. This leads me
to think that the Father and the Son are manifestations of the Spirit and they are all essentially one with the Spirit being the omnipresent force of the universe.
Originally posted by Jennym964
People worship Jesus because it's believed that He was a human version of the Spirit and he was filled with it. By worshipping and believing in him, you are essentially worshipping and believing in the Spirit since all things were done in the name of the Spirit. Hope this makes sense.
Originally posted by Akragon
reply to post by jmdewey60
unless you believe in salvation by "correct" doctrine, which to me is the mark of the beast.
that is an interesting idea... considering a third of the world is Christian yet there is a "narrow path"
Could you explain a little further?
The Commandments given to man was not the LAW . The LAW was the Judean faith and practices to atone for sin through sacrifices . Paul is saying that the old testament sacrificing for sin does not apply to Christianity because the acceptable sacrifice for sin made by Jesus did away with the rituals of the law .
Paul was literally talking about God's righteousness, not a figurative righteousness that is godly that we can somehow acquire, but is answering the question of if God is a just judge, or is He capricious, acting on whims and not being fair.
....and in this section of Romans it is made clear that the righteousness of God was finally made known to man. It's revealing is the gospel - the power of God into salvation.
There is nothing wrong with being righteous, where the problem comes from is people picking out just the parts of the law which makes someone look righteous on the outside, like not eating with gentiles or touching things what would 'defile' them. All the while ignoring the heart of the Law to love God and others as much as you love yourself.
No more self righteousness.
Which is the true righteousness that I just mentioned, which was pointed out by Jesus in his various discussions with the Jews. There is no 'thing', the "righteousness of God" that people can literally just put on as if by some magical spell, it is rather just a figurative way of describing a type of righteousness that is not hollow and only makes someone look righteous for the purpose of gaining a higher social status.
Only His righteousness shall save man.
Which is a dialect of the Syrian language called Aramaic, after a particular valley in that country where it was originally spoken, and has no relevance to Christians but is something that so called messianic jews use to lure Christians into their cult, making susceptible people feel like they have some sort of special knowledge that makes them better than other people.
Yahushua means "God saves".
Jesus was born of a woman and tempted in all things as his brothers, who we are when we follow him.
In which case, man is excluded even in the meaning of His name.
Jesus was the figurative 'name' of God, demonstrating in his actions the character of God. The leaders of the Jewish temple cult had Jesus killed, using gentiles to physically do it, imagining to themselves that they remained 'undefiled' by their actions.
Jesus was the righteousness of God walking this Earth, and the very people of Judea killed that righteousness.
Paul said that through the actions of one man (the first man) sin entered the world, and through that, death.
But there is an even more important law which Paul addresses elsewhere - the law of sin and death. The power/strength of sin is the law.
In Paul's arguments, the sting of death is being permanently dead, which would be the case if there was no resurrection.
The sting of sin is death.
I don't think that was the point that the story in Genesis was making, and I don't see Paul making that point either. According to Paul's use of the story, the problem was the first people's vulnerability to being deceived.
When did the serpent pop up in the garden of Eden? After the issuance of the command 'Do not eat'. Once a command or law is given, an inner principal becomes activated, one that questions that command and leads many to break it.
I don't think that was what Paul meant, rather it was that people should have a correct knowledge that there is a difference between right and wrong, and to have the ability to recognize when they are wrong, so that they can correct their behavior accordingly, as opposed to the general behaviour considered to be socially acceptable, which would not seem so if you have a proper religious Jewish upbringing.
Scripture shows us the same with Israel and the Mosaic law. It was given to disobedient people, who almost exclusively fell when enticed by the 'law of sin and death' to break every part of it. For ears to hear, it was given so that transgressions would INCREASE.
According to your theory, which I do not believe was shared by the New Testament writers. The natural spirit is trapped in a sin and death cycle and the only way out is an exchange of spirits, the old for the new, that is now available in this apocalyptic age ushered in by the life and death and resurrection and ascension of Christ who is now in the position to give us the spiritual gifts promised of old to live according to the law of the New Covenant which is through the faith in Jesus.
The Mosaic law cannot give life to sinners or save them from their sins. The law, which promises life, in the hand of sinners, leads to death.. Why? Carnal man and his carnal mind and flesh cannot obey the law of God because it's ruled by the serpent.