Originally posted by Samtzurr
You yourself flagged the thread to be deleted, didn't you? So we agree.
I've never made a thread - I'm unfortunately a dime-a-dozen reactionary thinker, I blame public schools - but I wonder how many flags your
intellectual inspirational influences have had. If I were a betting man, I'd say all of mine have zero between them.
On another point, I do agree that Snowden is overblown and we should keep our guard up and maintain skepticism; but that's just like, our opinions,
I 'marked' this thread to be deleted.
But that is not the same thing as a 'flag' on the thread itself.
I changed the thread title to "*****DELETE***** -
after the convo with DocHolidaze began to fill the front page with an argument, instead of anything else.
After an hour had passed, the thread still hadn't been removed.
so I then edited the original post to be about the argument.
Taking the 'stars n flags' accusations, and exposing the instigator.
He lost the argument, and I got the stars I so needfully craved.
I had no point in creating this thread... and I don't need one.
I did so on a whim...
a spur of the moment, light bulb going off, troll-face troll-face, whim.
This is the Jokes forum -
No links, sources, proofs, pics, videos, informative posts, etc. are required.
- so why you posted the 'ATS starting a new thread?' rule... is meaningless and irrelevant.
I understand your 'not creating your own threads because of reactionary thinking' mind-set.
But if your afraid of self-expression at the risk of being flamed... that is your own problem.
don't need to be instructed on how to create a thread; or lectured on what it should contain.
If you get the Edward Snowden thing
- then why are we even having this conversation?
It doesn't matter if it's just an 'opinion' -
it was an either "you get it, or you don't get it" one-liner.
Another thread title on the new topics page: Edward Snowden.
and a self-explanatory op: ( fin )
- posted in the appropriate forum.
Bah, boom, tis' - Ha ha. L o l.
End of story.