It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by jmdewey60
reply to post by colbe
The commentary that you are quoting uses a term, "eternal sacrifice", as if this is a biblical given and used to interpret all these verses, even though there is no description of such a thing in the Bible.
So all you have to offer is a circular proof by saying ahead of time what the Bible is supposed to be supporting.
OK, I get that you think that, but I think you, and in addition to just you, the whole cult calling itself the Catholic Church, is wrong.
A priest offers sacrifice.
Originally posted by jmdewey60
reply to post by colbe
OK, I get that you think that, but I think you, and in addition to just you, the whole cult calling itself the Catholic Church, is wrong.
A priest offers sacrifice.
Now you may have Medieval traditions that say it is right, but you don't have the Bible saying so, no matter how much biased commentary say it does.
Can you just quote one verse in the New Testament that says that anyone can offer Jesus to God as a sacrifice or anything else?
I already am, just not a member of a cult only calling himself that.
I pray you become
Catholic one day.
Originally posted by jmdewey60
reply to post by colbe
I already am, just not a member of a cult only calling himself that.
I pray you become
Catholic one day.
There is one church, which contains all the members of Christ.
It is only a cult that will set himself up to say anyone not in their club will not be saved.
Originally posted by colbe
Originally posted by jmdewey60
reply to post by colbe
OK, I get that you think that, but I think you, and in addition to just you, the whole cult calling itself the Catholic Church, is wrong.
A priest offers sacrifice.
Now you may have Medieval traditions that say it is right, but you don't have the Bible saying so, no matter how much biased commentary say it does.
Can you just quote one verse in the New Testament that says that anyone can offer Jesus to God as a sacrifice or anything else?
The Bible is a Catholic book Jim, so you're reading a book given to you from Catholicism so your insulting "cult" term doesn't fit. You should be tossing your Bible out the window. No, no, teasing, I pray you become
Catholic one day.
I truly wish I could explain to you, the apologist's words at Scripturecatholic.com explain Scripture much better than I but John Salza is not a help. You see in God's plan, the fact of offering sacrifice to God.
Jesus, our "high priest" offers in Heaven His supreme perfect sacrifice to the Father. On earth, the priest offers Our Lord's sacrifice to the Father "continually", every day in the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass. The only difference is that it is an unbloody offering. Jesus died once. Then, one receives Jesus, all of Him in the most Holy Eucharist at Mass. It is the plan, supernatural, we consume God in the New Covenant not a mere sacrificed lamb as in the Old.
I gave example, always greater in the New Covenant. You can see the typology, the prefiguring in the Old Testament. Remember, Abraham in great faith was going to offer His son as a sacrifice to God in the Old? God request of Abraham but God stops him. Not so with His only Son, Jesus Christ. That is a type. Jesus who is God Himself, the son of God, is offered to the the Father in the New Covenant.
Long ago, in Malachi, the prophecy about the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass and in the Gospel, Jesus tells the Apostles, the first priests, to offer My body and blood to the Father. Jesus says in Luke "is given", that means
an offering, a sacrifice. Jesus says "do this", meaning to continue to offer as I have to the Father.
+ + +
Malachi 1:11 For from the rising of the sun even to the going down, my name is great among the Gentiles, and in every place there is SACRIFICE, and there is offered to my name a CLEAN OBLATION: for my name is great among the Gentiles, saith the Lord of hosts.
footnote: [11] A clean oblation: Viz., the precious body and blood of Christ in the eucharistic sacrifice.
Luke 22:19 And taking bread, he gave thanks, and brake; and gave to them, saying: This is my body, which IS GIVEN for you. DO THIS for a commemoration of me. [20] In like manner the chalice also, after he had supped, saying: This is the chalice, the new testament in my blood, which shall be shed for you.
footnote: [19] Do this for a commemoration of me: This sacrifice and sacrament is to be continued in the church, to the end of the world, to shew forth the death of Christ, until he cometh. But this commemoration, or remembrance, is by no means inconsistent with the real presence of his body and blood, under these sacramental veils, which represent his death; on the contrary, it is the manner that he himself hath commanded, of commemorating and celebrating his death, by offering in sacrifice, and receiving in the sacrament, that body and blood by which we were redeemed.
www.drbo.org...
Because it is not a ligitimate answer.
I gave you a type in Scripture, the prefiguring of Jesus', the eternal sacrifice offered to the Father with the account of Abraham offering Isaac to the Father. How come you do not reply Jim?
Originally posted by colbe
Originally posted by jmdewey60
reply to post by colbe
Because it is not a ligitimate answer.
I gave you a type in Scripture, the prefiguring of Jesus', the eternal sacrifice offered to the Father with the account of Abraham offering Isaac to the Father. How come you do not reply Jim?
The New Testament does not relate that story in Genesis to Jesus.
You only have human tradition to support the claim of this cult only calling itself catholic.
Jesus in Glory Perpetually Offers the Father His Sacrifice on Our Behalf
Originally posted by jmdewey60
reply to post by colbe
Jesus in Glory Perpetually Offers the Father His Sacrifice on Our Behalf
It actually says the opposite that he entered once with his own blood, not as an offering but as the seal of the new covenant.
Originally posted by jmdewey60
reply to post by colbe
Your interpretation of Romans 15:16 seems to be that Paul taught the gentiles so that when they gave their sacrifices, they would be accepted by God.
The right interpretation is that Paul was making a metaphor, where in it, he is the priest and his offering to God is the gentiles, who were made acceptable by his having preached to them the gospel.
I think that most of the bad theology on this forum comes from people posting here who have part of their brain disabled that is supposed to pick up on metaphors, and like a small child, only see things in literal terms.
Originally posted by jmdewey60
reply to post by colbe
Your interpretation of Romans 15:16 seems to be that Paul taught the gentiles so that when they gave their sacrifices, they would be accepted by God.
The right interpretation is that Paul was making a metaphor, where in it, Texthe is the priest and his offering to God is the gentiles, who were made acceptable by his having preached to them the gospel.
I think that most of the bad theology on this forum comes from people posting here who have part of their brain disabled that is supposed to pick up on metaphors, and like a small child, only see things in literal terms.
Christ's eternal sacrifice offered to the Father is NOT a metaphor.
Since when?
God did NOT give everyone reading Scripture the authority to interpret it.
The Catholic church was the original schismatic cult.
How many Protestant sects are there now?
Oh, wow, you admit Paul is "the priest.!!!"
Originally posted by jmdewey60
reply to post by colbe
Oh, wow, you admit Paul is "the priest.!!!"
Young children have an inability to "get" complex concepts like sarcasm and metaphor, and some adults don't either, where they never developed that ability and are in a certain way retarded, and so they make weird exclamations like you did because they can only comprehend things in a literal way, never having developed the ability to see things in any other way.
I will quote part of a sentence from Romans by Robert Jewett to show that I am not the only one who thinks that Paul is "offering" the gentiles.
. . . Paul's evangelistic proclamation results in a transformation of the Gentiles into an "acceptable offering" in fulfilment of an end-time scheme . . .edit on 23-7-2013 by jmdewey60 because: (no reason given)
You seem to be another Catholic fallen into belief in a cult rather than the Bible as your theological source, preferring the doctrines of men over the word of God.
Another Protestant's same error.
Jesus was never presented in the Bible as an offering to God, but always as an offering from God to the world.
Our Lord's perfect sacrifice is remembered and continued to be offered to God the Father. Our Lord's sacrifice on the Cross is represented, offered to the Father in an unbloody manner. Did you read the papers yesterday/today, humanity is still sinning. And God the Father desires we never to forget.
The Prophecy was in Daniel and it was about the end of a daily sacrifice.
Your "the Gentiles into an "acceptable offering" ie: sacrifice, is not the "continual sacrifice" prophesied in the OT and fulfilled in the New.
That is a later confabulation of the Roman schismatic cult only calling itself catholic. The Bible does not present Jesus as being sacrificed to God, but was sacrificed by God towards our salvation by believing in him.
ONLY Jesus can be the perfect sacrifice offered in atonement to the Father for the world's sins.
The covenant inaugurated through his death is eternal, not his being killed daily on the cultish (pagan influenced practice) altar.
Jesus' one time offering for all is perpetual and eternal.
The word "sacrifice" is not in the verses in 1 John that you quoted. The word "propitiation" doesn't mean necessarily sacrifice, but something conducive to peace between two parties.
It is correct to understand Christ’s sacrifice as the only propitiation for sins.