It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by dragonridr
Where not in a loop because it would violate the rules of entropy. Its like dropping a glass and have it break it can't put itself back together so you can drop it again.
Originally posted by ImaFungi
Originally posted by dragonridr
Where not in a loop because it would violate the rules of entropy. Its like dropping a glass and have it break it can't put itself back together so you can drop it again.
Then where did all the energy of the universe come from, and where does it have to go?
Originally posted by dragonridr
Originally posted by ImaFungi
Originally posted by dragonridr
Where not in a loop because it would violate the rules of entropy. Its like dropping a glass and have it break it can't put itself back together so you can drop it again.
Then where did all the energy of the universe come from, and where does it have to go?
Well the simple answer is energy can't be created or destroyed so it has all ways been here and will all ways be here.
Originally posted by dragonridr
Well the simple answer is energy can't be created or destroyed so it has all ways been here and will all ways be here. Isn't physics fun sounds like philosophy
Originally posted by Guadeloupe
reply to post by ImaFungi
Try as you might to avoid the issue - it is by definition, impossible to discuss Father Georges Lemaitre's 'hypothesis of the primeval atom' absent the notion of God. The phrase "Big Bang" is actually meant to be a kind of a mocking poke at the good priest invented by the Russian scientist, and former partner of Father Lemaitre, George Gamov, and unfortunately - it stuck.
So, when all is said and done, the Big Bang was then, and always will be fundamentally a religious idea: a theological premise designed in a scientific manner to help explain the origins of the universe, which by the way, was immediately adopted by Pope Pius XII who referred to the new theory of the origin of the universe as a scientific validation of the Catholic faith, for which Lemaître was rather alarmed and showed his displeasure at his new ideas becoming understood as a doctrine of the faith rather than as a strictly scientific doctrine. But the pope knew full well that any explanation of the 'beginning' had to have come from the hand and mind of God.
Lemaitre argued vehemently with the pope against that idea, and wanted to hold that any explanation of his proposal (hypothesis) should be understood on purely scientific grounds, for obvious reasons.
Rather delicately of course, he attempted - in the presence of the pope - to separate the two: “As far as I can see, such a theory remains entirely outside any metaphysical or religious question. It leaves the materialist free to deny any transcendental Being… For the believer, it removes any attempt at familiarity with God… It is consonant with Isaiah speaking of the hidden God, hidden even in the beginning of the universe.”
I think they are both correct; Lemaitre on scientific grounds, and Pope Pius XII on theological grounds, of which they each had a full understanding in their respective ways.
Originally posted by Guadeloupe
reply to post by dragonridr
I misunderstood nothing.......you obviously didn't read my post, and if you did read it your comprehension skills are that of a G.E.D. graduate. Half of my remarks are devoted to his displeasure of a religious interpretation.
Please think things through before responding.edit on 26-6-2013 by Guadeloupe because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by dragonridr
Originally posted by FlySolo
I think...the best answer is the easiest one. We can't fathom what happened in the beginning because, we're caught in an infinite loop. A computer loop?
The chicken or the egg idiom comes to mind. If you use the analogy of a computer program, it all makes sense.
An infinite loop (also known as an endless loop or unproductive loop) is a sequence of instructions in a computer program which loops endlessly, either due to the loop having no terminating condition, having one that can never be met, or one that causes the loop to start over.
Where not in a loop because it would violate the rules of entropy. Its like dropping a glass and have it break it can't put itself back together so you can drop it again.
Originally posted by FlySolo
Originally posted by dragonridr
Originally posted by FlySolo
I think...the best answer is the easiest one. We can't fathom what happened in the beginning because, we're caught in an infinite loop. A computer loop?
The chicken or the egg idiom comes to mind. If you use the analogy of a computer program, it all makes sense.
An infinite loop (also known as an endless loop or unproductive loop) is a sequence of instructions in a computer program which loops endlessly, either due to the loop having no terminating condition, having one that can never be met, or one that causes the loop to start over.
Where not in a loop because it would violate the rules of entropy. Its like dropping a glass and have it break it can't put itself back together so you can drop it again.
Even a loop can contain functions. Entropy could just be another executable statement within the confines of an endless loop.
Do while (the secrets of the universe have not been discovered)
function (entropy)
loop
Originally posted by knowledgedesired
The truth is... NOBODY KNOWS so everyone theory is a possible answer.
I see your point but entropy only works in one direction. Here ill use an example everyone knows we have a house and we all know it takes a lot of energy to keep it clean. If we just stopped dust collects bugs move in eventually without repair the house deteriorates bringing disorder. The universe works the same way the more time goes by the more disordered it becomes. It would take energy to bring it back to an ordered state and that energy just isn't there.
en·tro·py /ˈentrəpē/ Noun 1. A thermodynamic quantity representing the unavailability of a system's thermal energy for conversion into mechanical work.
2. Lack of order or predictability; gradual decline into disorder.
Originally posted by dragonridr
reply to post by FlySolo
You know I was going to say you can't undo time but funny part is in QM you can, We have shown the future can change the past so now that I think about it makes a different perspective on where the biginnibg is.