It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by NavyDoc
Dude, you started out violating the T&C with your rudness and name calling. If you are going to dish it out, be prepared to take it, otherwise quit bitching when someone gives you a tase of your own sauce.
Notice that many people have piled on to you? Perhaps it is because throughout this thread you have been rude and condescending to everyone who disagreed with your stupid thoughts. As a result, everyone has responded in kind and you've been getting piled on. If one person is rude to you, he might be a jerk. However, if EVERYONE is rude to you, the jerk most likely is you.edit on 21-5-2013 by NavyDoc because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by NavyDoc
Originally posted by SeekerofTruth101
reply to post by thesaneone
Discrediting is not you alone to say. WHat you post is only exactly what you meant and your intentions clearly.
Movies dont kill, for sure. It never did. Movies don't carry guns or explosives. It only inflames people, and for some, to commit atrocities. And if you deny muslims were cool about that anti-islam movie, what other lies will you accept? No wonder you have so much blind faith in the deflections to the economy by the GOP using this Benghazi affair to waste Congress's time to avoid the taxation issues.
Quit thinking you and your kind can attack me, even if you freely assume you can ignore the T&C. You dont have what it takes to be in that league.
Dude, you started out violating the T&C with your rudness and name calling. If you are going to dish it out, be prepared to take it, otherwise quit bitching when someone gives you a tase of your own sauce.
Notice that many people have piled on to you? Perhaps it is because throughout this thread you have been rude and condescending to everyone who disagreed with your stupid thoughts. As a result, everyone has responded in kind and you've been getting piled on. If one person is rude to you, he might be a jerk. However, if EVERYONE is rude to you, the jerk most likely is you.edit on 21-5-2013 by NavyDoc because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by SeekerofTruth101
reply to post by NavyDoc
Oh great arrogant one, even though you think you can decieve others now with the deflections of layered defences at Fort Knox, the reality is still that the gold are kept in steel vaults. Dare you deny it, oh great decietful one? But I am sure you dare not answer, and will continue on and on with other deflections.
And was not your theory that explosives, bullets and gasoline can destroy steel vaults, oh mighty expert of military affairs? Dare you deny it? But I am sure you will again twist and turn with your own words.
And now, despite my good intentions to educate you, you chose to call teachers moron? You must have been born all knowing, oh great arrogant one.
And still, no need to thanks me for my time for giving you attention that you must have been starved off. I am a kind person. Cheers.
Originally posted by SeekerofTruth101
reply to post by thesaneone
No. Please do make it clear, or you would be as dishonest as the others in your attempts to discredit me.
It was what made the muslims enraged and thought murder, and the terrorists who carried it out. Try refuting facts and reality of that situation, of what actually happened, for once, if you foolishly think you can. Reporters and the likes of you may lie, but pics of their demostration and victory signs infront of the compound as well as the ambassador's body being carried don't lie.
Originally posted by dragonridr
reply to post by Xcathdra
Doesnt really matter nothing he has done reaches the level of an impeachable offense .......
Originally posted by EarthCitizen07
Yeah we all work for the GOP, how cute?
Originally posted by Xcathdra
Originally posted by dragonridr
reply to post by Xcathdra
Doesnt really matter nothing he has done reaches the level of an impeachable offense .......
Lol really?
Please do some research on what constitutes a high crime or misdemeanor at the Federal level as it pertains to impeachment.
A hint... research Nixon vs. United states before responding.
Originally posted by Xcathdra
reply to post by EarthCitizen07
Respectfully, you would be wrong.
What constitutes a high crime or misdemeanor with regards to Federal impeachment is set by the Congress, not a law.
I linked to Nixon vs. US specifically to demonstrate the US Supreme Court ruling affirming that Congress sets that criteria, not a law.
It is part of the checks and balances of our FEderal Government.
Originally posted by EarthCitizen07
How exactly does criminal justice work with politicians? Didn't blagojevich, the governor of illinois do jail time for rigging the state elections?
The Illinois House and Senate moved quickly thereafter to impeach the governor for abuse of power and corruption. On January 8, the Illinois House voted 114-1 (with three abstentions) to impeach Blagojevich.[97][98] The charges brought by the House emphasized Blagojevich's alleged abuses of power and his alleged attempts to sell gubernatorial appointments and legislative authorizations and/or vetoes. One of the accusations was an alleged attempt to sell the appointment to the United States Senate seat vacated by the resignation of Barack Obama. Blagojevich was frequently reported as having been taped by the FBI saying "I've got this thing, and it's #ing golden. I'm just not giving it up for #ing nothing."[99] He was removed from office and prohibited from ever holding public office in the state of Illinois again, by two separate and unanimous votes of 59–0 by the Illinois Senate on January 29, 2009. Blagojevich's lieutenant governor Patrick Quinn subsequently became governor of Illinois.[100]
Blagojevich's impeachment trial and removal from office did not have any effect or bearing on his federal indictment in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, as impeachment is a political, not a criminal, action.[101]
Originally posted by Xcathdra
No what I am saying, and people are ignoring, is Congress can determine, with respect to Presidential / Vice Presidential / Executive Officers impeachment, what constitutes a high crime and misdemeanor.
In Presidential Impeachment, it is NOT a court / legal issue. Impeachment resides solely with Congress. The House of Representatives is responsible for filing those charges. If the House passes the articles of impeachment, then its up to the Senate to "prosecute" the case. The Chief Justice of the US Supreme Court acts as the judge.
Congress determines what a high crime or misdemeanor is, not a statute or law. Impeachment is NOT a criminal trial. It is designed solely as a remedy to remove an elected / appointed person from office in order to go for criminal prosecution in the criminal justice system.
Originally posted by macman
Originally posted by EarthCitizen07
Yeah we all work for the GOP, how cute?
Now I have heard it all.
As a standing example, I want everyone to witness this.
I agree with EarthCitizen within this thread.
How weird that was to say.
Im not sure how to answer this. Its like comparing apples to Zebras.
Originally posted by EarthCitizen07
So a "high crime" in the impeachment process is the equivilent of a felony in a criminal case?
Originally posted by EarthCitizen07
So the senate is the equivilant of the grand jury in a criminal case and the DOJ chief is the equivilant of a court judge?
Originally posted by EarthCitizen07
Fair enough. This I understand quite well. Basically politicians have immunity from court and must be removed first before standing trial in a criminal court.
Thanks for clarifying. Its a bit confusing at times.
Originally posted by Xcathdra
Nope..
The House of Rep would be the grand jury, bringing forward the artciles of impeachment.
IThe Senate acts as the Prosecution of those articles.
The Chuief Justice of the Supreme Court acts as Judge and Jury.
Bill Clinton, 42nd President of the United States, was impeached by the House of Representatives on two charges, one of perjury and one of obstruction of justice, on December 19, 1998. Two other impeachment articles, a second perjury charge and a charge of abuse of power, failed in the House. The charges arose from the Lewinsky scandal and the Paula Jones lawsuit.
He was acquitted by the Senate on February 12, 1999. Requiring a two-thirds majority for a conviction, only 50 senators (out of 100) voted guilty on the obstruction charge and 45 on the perjury charge. The Senate was 17 votes short of removing Clinton from office.
Originally posted by EarthCitizen07
Normally the grand jury gets to vote on the verdict. In the impeachment process it seems that the articles of impeachment are introduced by a house representative and then the senate acts as grand jury casting their individual votes. This is what I thought!
Originally posted by EarthCitizen07
And the chief justice of the supreme court has the only vote that decides all? Is this how federal impeachment differs from state impeachment process? In the blagojevich impeachment case the state senate voted 59-0 to have him impeached per the article you provided.
Bill Clinton, 42nd President of the United States, was impeached by the House of Representatives on two charges, one of perjury and one of obstruction of justice, on December 19, 1998. Two other impeachment articles, a second perjury charge and a charge of abuse of power, failed in the House. The charges arose from the Lewinsky scandal and the Paula Jones lawsuit.
He was acquitted by the Senate on February 12, 1999. Requiring a two-thirds majority for a conviction, only 50 senators (out of 100) voted guilty on the obstruction charge and 45 on the perjury charge. The Senate was 17 votes short of removing Clinton from office.
Debate over the meaning of this phrase has existed since the framing of the Constitution. Ultimately, Congress decides what constitutes "high crimes and misdemeanors". In 1970, Rep. Gerald Ford, R-Michigan, succinctly summarized this point when he stated: "An impeachable offense is whatever a majority of the House of Representatives considers it to be at a given moment in history."