It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Whistleblowing website WikiLeaks today published more than 1.7million U.S. records covering diplomatic or intelligence reports on every country in the world.
The data released today includes more than 1.7million U.S. diplomatic records from 1973 to 1976 - covering a traffic of cables, intelligence reports and congressional correspondence.
WikiLeaks described the Public Library of US Diplomacy (PlusD) as the world's largest searchable collection of U.S. confidential, or formerly confidential, diplomatic communications.
The Ecuadorian Government has granted Mr Assange political asylum and has repeatedly offered Swedish prosecutors the chance to interview him at the embassy in Knightsbridge, central London.
Mr Assange said the information showed the ‘vast range and scope’ of U.S. diplomatic and intelligence activity around the world.
The collection published today has not been leaked, but Mr Assange said WikiLeaks had been working for the past year to analyse and assess a vast amount of data held at the U.S. national archives before releasing it in a searchable form.
Mr Assange said WikiLeaks had developed sophisticated technical systems to deal with ‘complex and voluminous’ data.
Thats what puzzles me about his mother's comments. Is she part of Wikileaks organization or some sort of activitists/agent?
Originally posted by Agit8dChop
What worries me, is earlier today Assange spoke about this release. He said point blank, I prepared this release while at the embassy.Does this now, technically, warrant an investigation against the embassy for facilitiating him?could this allow a 'technical' warrant on some sorts? allowing the bill access?
True but making the public aware elsewhere in the world or simply stirring the pot?
Originally posted by PsykoOps
These weren't leaked thought. They were public already. WL just indexes and reposts them.
Originally posted by Agit8dChop
What worries me, is earlier today Assange spoke about this release. He said point blank, I prepared this release while at the embassy.
Does this now, technically, warrant an investigation against the embassy for facilitiating him?
could this allow a 'technical' warrant on some sorts? allowing the bill access?