It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by WhiteAlice
Originally posted by watcher3339
Originally posted by WhiteAlice
That is an rather awkward use of the term "mortally wounded", which is generally associated with death of a victim. However, he's not really misusing the term "mortal wound" at all. A mortal wound is one that threatens life but can be survived with prompt medical attention. It's a wound that threatens the loss of life, not assures the loss of life 100% of the time. So, technically, Giffords WAS mortally wounded and if it hadn't been for medical intervention, then she would have died due to a mortal wound. However, she survived and became simply wounded. Mortal, as an adjective, means liable or subject to death. It's an implication of extreme severity as well. One can hold mortal fear but that doesn't mean that they are going to die from that fear. They are simply extremely afraid.
Gotta love the English language in all its infinite complexities. Totally agree with the prior posters' remarks about Biden's use of clips though. They are magazines--not clips!
Thank you, thank you, thank you. It was driving me crazy that nobody seemed to know that. Doesn't anyone read anymore? It's a context issue and the fact that she is alive is exactly how you know that he meant serious or severe.
You're welcome, you're welcome, and you're welcome! I'm just one of those jerks that will actually correct grammatical and spelling errors while playing an online video game. There's a slur for people like me. People tend to be overly critical of elected officials' word usage and ability to elucidate their meanings. Bush was a huge target for this kind of thing and, as much as I can't stand the guy's positions on ANYTHING, I also recognize that he may very have issues with aphasia as someone who has problems with aphasia (better yet, grammar/english nazi who sometimes can't remember what a book is called--ha!). When you're in the limelight, everything you do is put under a microscope and can be twisted and turned by one's detractors. Bush and Quayle became "idiots" because of their verbal accidents. Same thing technically going on here with Biden.edit on 21/3/13 by WhiteAlice because: correcting my own grammatical failure--epic.
Originally posted by PLAYERONE01
I guess anyone could have survived that, its not like taking an almost point blank 9mm to the head is serious enough for people to ask any questions on wtf is going on.
Originally posted by Wrabbit2000
Originally posted by sheepslayer247
It's amazing what some people say when they are in front of cameras all day long. They sure say some dumb stuff.
But are we any better? I see posts on ATS that say more idiotic things than what Biden said and these people have the time to revise their posts before they submit it.
So you can make fun of Biden, but make sure you never make a mistake either.......otherwise you're a hypocrite.
If or when I become the #2 most powerful man in the Western World, I'll be sure to be a bit more thoughtful in my choice of words and thoughts than he makes a regular habit of being.
Until then, there is about as much comparison here as Apples and Kumquats. They're both edible? However, there ends the similarity. So it holds for comparing the Vice President of the United States complete with his staff and protocol people to support him, no less, with any average American who is NOT held to such a high level.
Just my thoughts on that example.
Originally posted by g146541
reply to post by Wrabbit2000
I was not even aware that Giffords had been shot in the head.
I have seen a couple of head wounds and at the very least, they leave some kind of identifier.
Whether it be a noticeable scar or deformity or a tick or slope to the features of the face.
Giffords still has a perfect face.
Maybe she was barely grazed and the whole circus story was hyped for affect.
I guess Biden was hoping Giffords had been killed, so he and DiFi could press their ban scheme.
Originally posted by ignorant_ape
reply to post by Wrabbit2000
instead of throwing poo , might i sugest picking up a dictionary ? biden is correct - " mortally wounded " does NOT automatically mean fatally wounded , but it is the most common synonym
Originally posted by sheepslayer247
So you can make fun of Biden, but make sure you never make a mistake either.......otherwise you're a hypocrite.
Originally posted by TsukiLunar
HAHA SOMEONE USED A WORD THAT IN MY OPINION SHOULD BE USED DIFFERENTLY LOOK AT ME I AM SMART
Originally posted by butcherguy
Originally posted by TsukiLunar
HAHA SOMEONE USED A WORD THAT IN MY OPINION SHOULD BE USED DIFFERENTLY LOOK AT ME I AM SMART
Is it opinion?
Or, by commonly accepted use of the term 'mortally wounded', was he simply WRONG?
A mortal wound is a very severe and serious injury (almost always a form of penetration or laceration) whether accidental or inflicted intentionally (by either suicide or homicide). It can, but does not necessarily, lead to the death of the victim.
: in a deadly or fatal manner : to death
Originally posted by butcherguy
reply to post by TsukiLunar
That would be why I said commonly accepted.