It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Uhhh, you gave the impression that I should not post anything contrary to your op when you said "Your ideas are irrelevant to the point I am making." You keep wanting to categorize what several of us have been posting as new age concepts, and even when I mentioned various quotes attributed to Jesus, you said you didn't care what the quotes said. (You can also see the last few posts on the "God loves me" thread in case you don't recall this.)
You keep insisting that I am putting forth some new age perspective in order for you to discount what myself and others have been posting here. I have been supporting these arguments with scriptural quotes, and then you discount those and say, well, popular belief is assuming the God as Other presumption - and yes, this is true, but this is NOT to say this is what Jesus was actually teaching.
John 17:20-26
New International Version (NIV)
20 “My prayer is not for them alone. I pray also for those who will believe in me through their message, 21 that all of them may be one, Father, just as you are in me and I am in you. May they also be in us so that the world may believe that you have sent me. 22 I have given them the glory that you gave me, that they may be one as we are one— 23 I in them and you in me—so that they may be brought to complete unity. Then the world will know that you sent me and have loved them even as you have loved me.
24 “Father, I want those you have given me to be with me where I am, and to see my glory, the glory you have given me because you loved me before the creation of the world.
25 “Righteous Father, though the world does not know you, I know you, and they know that you have sent me. 26 I have made you[a] known to them, and will continue to make you known in order that the love you have for me may be in them and that I myself may be in them.”
Hahahaha! Given you already disregarded my quoting from the Bible, this makes it a bit more difficult! A koan, indeed! Good one, zen master AI!
So now you are eliminating from this discussion much of what Jesus actually spoke about. Okay, now I see why you don't like the quotes I put forth my argument with. Basically, it is sounding more and more that you are only interested in the God of the Old Testament.
Again, this sounds like only the God of the Old Testament, not what Jesus was putting forward.
LOL! After all this discussion, this is your summary?!
You are exactly right - there is no reference to a separate God elsewhere, in that quote - and that is exactly why I chose it. Jesus is speaking of not being separate from God. Again, there is no presumption of God as Other in this quote, nor in the others I quoted - e.g., relative to Jesus' two great commandments.
Originally posted by AfterInfinity
reply to post by bb23108
Ah, yes...this, right here:
John 17:20-26
New International Version (NIV)
20 “My prayer is not for them alone. I pray also for those who will believe in me through their message, 21 that all of them may be one, Father, just as you are in me and I am in you. May they also be in us so that the world may believe that you have sent me. 22 I have given them the glory that you gave me, that they may be one as we are one— 23 I in them and you in me—so that they may be brought to complete unity. Then the world will know that you sent me and have loved them even as you have loved me.
24 “Father, I want those you have given me to be with me where I am, and to see my glory, the glory you have given me because you loved me before the creation of the world.
25 “Righteous Father, though the world does not know you, I know you, and they know that you have sent me. 26 I have made you[a] known to them, and will continue to make you known in order that the love you have for me may be in them and that I myself may be in them.”
I don't see any reference to a "great other" in those scriptures. As far as I can tell, you are still attempting to validate Christian doctrine with non-Christian ideals.
You are exactly right - there is no reference to a separate God elsewhere, in that quote - and that is exactly why I chose it. Jesus is speaking of not being separate from God. Again, there is no presumption of God as Other in this quote, nor in the others I quoted - e.g., Jesus' two great commandments.
After seeing your post here of what I mean by God as the Great Other, I now understand that you just don't get what I am saying. God as Other, separate and elsewhere, is not what Jesus is teaching. He is teaching and making accessible the God of Non-separation, indivisible, inclusive of all. The Old Testament spoke much more in terms of a separate God (Other), one to be feared, etc. and your op's presumption holds up with this version of God.
It doesn't matter what I am saying - this is what various quotes attributed to Jesus are saying.
Originally posted by AfterInfinity
So you're saying that "God" is not separate from us?
You are assuming the separate God as the basis for your premise.
Originally posted by AfterInfinity
What does this have to do with my premise?
Originally posted by AfterInfinity
Ah. That answers my second question above. My response is: this is no presumption, but a summary of the teachings of Christians all across our nation! Regardless of those quotes, that is not what Christians are teaching, and that is not what they are learning. Ask them about it, and they will tell you that "God" is greater, that they are separate.
Originally posted by AfterInfinity
You cannot be a servant and be one with that which you are serving.
Originally posted by AfterInfinity
reply to post by windword
Why is worship necessary at all? Why is veneration not enough? Respect, even? Why do we have to worship anything?
I have always agreed with you on this point - but what I am saying (with my posts that include the quotes) this is NOT what Jesus was actually teaching when a fuller examination of his teachings are made.
The separate God idea is perpetuated by religions for a variety of reasons - which some of us have also discussed. See windword's responses to my posts for example.
In your words, AI, prove this! (Because I beg to differ.)
Okay, so what you are saying is that you don't care if Jesus' teachings have been misunderstood, it is what mainstream Christianity has become, that you are criticizing regardless. Right?
Originally posted by AfterInfinity
That's an entirely different subject, and bringing it up is not conducive to the flow of this discussion. I'm not saying I disagree - I am saying that this thread is not concerned with that particular quarrel.
Originally posted by AfterInfinity
Because you cannot be both master and slave.
The collective ego of mankind certainly likes this position - it not only allows us to blame God, but to feel betrayed and abandoned by such a One too. It further ensures and reinforces the sense of self via apparently justified separation into unlove, betrayal, feelings of abandonment, etc.
Originally posted by vethumanbeing
What if mankind invented God to suite its own needs of subjugation, moral duplicity; to explain its own faults to fingerpoint and blame the supposed 'higher being' for the abandonment?
Okay, so what you are saying is that you don't care if Jesus' teachings have been misunderstood, it is what mainstream Christianity has become, that you are criticizing regardless. Right?
If so, isn't your solution throwing the baby out with the bath water? Why only make your points about what Christianity has become - basically an extension of the same religious presumptions of the Old Testament that God is separate, elsewhere, and to be feared or at least used as some kind of security blanket that can be bought through certain beliefs, presumptions, prayers, acts, rites, etc.
Now you have changed your original wording from "You cannot be a servant and be one with that which you are serving." to "master and slave". A very big difference here, so you are basing your argument on a different relationship than originally posted.
What I was getting at is that our body-minds are all subservient to the non-separate Reality in which we arise by the very fact that these body-minds are sacrificed sooner or later in death. To try and alleviate this fear, we invent the separate ego-I and assume everyone is "other" to us. Many of us also take solace in an all-powerful Creator God. Your arguments always seem to support this separative proposition - "I" over against all others, master-slave, etc.
And you think they'll pay heed to what you have to say? You don't seem to be a person of compromise at all. It's either your way or the highway, right? Sounds a lot like the Christians you made this thread for if you ask me.
So tell me, ATS: can love and tyranny be mutually inclusive? If not, where do you draw the line?
They are not mutually inclusive, good and bad are two ends on the same spectrum. God is not bad, "he" is good, Satan is bad.
I'm not sure why you think god must be bad, the bible's version of god is not the true god. Do you disagree with that? Or are you completely against the notion of any kind of god?
You are making the assumption that such beings are only separate entities and thereby basing your entire argument on that. I am not basing my statement about the body-mind being subservient to Reality on that same presumption. Rather than asking about what am I actually talking about, since you obviously did not understand it, you respond as follows:
Originally posted by AfterInfinity
If you are one with that which is served, you are the master as well. That's the definition of unity - you are one entity.
You see, this kind of patronizing is very closed-minded, unattractive, and basically will tend to end further communication..
Originally posted by AfterInfinity
Honestly, I'm flabbergasted that I had to explain that. You should really practice mind-bending puzzles, work on that flexibility there.
Another example of the same attitude and inability to actually communicate - i.e., connect with whomever you are writing to. Your self-righteousness in your communication here should be further inspected - as you will fail to get your communication across if you persist in this polarized approach.
Originally posted by AfterInfinity
But I am busy with other prey for the time being.
God didn't create Satan, they are both part of the same system. You cannot have one without the other, it's called balance and the universe (God) is based on balance. If there was no bad then we wouldn't be able to appreciate the good.
The Source is both good and bad, God being the good end and Satan being the bad end. God and Satan are nothing more than states of mind, not entities that watch everything you do ready to throw you in a pit forever.
You have a skewed perception of what god is, and for some reason you can't move away from the god of the OT, even though you don't believe in him. Why is that? Are you so against there being some kind of god that you have to make him out to be evil? Are you unable to move past that certain depiction of him?
Can I ask you a question? If there is a god, what do you consider him/her/it to be? Would you consider god to be loving or hateful?