Meteorite Crashes in Russia, page 95


Pages: <<  92    93    94    95    96    97    98  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 381 times


reply posted on 16-2-2013 @ 03:39 PM by defcon5
reply to post by hesse


The following is my opinion as a member participating in this discussion.


I haven't seen it, but Youtube is notoriously filled with hoaxes, and old videos that are retitled every time a similar new event occurs. If anyone had a piece of “real” footage, they would sell it to the press for serious cash, not post it on Youtube for free.

The first thing that comes to mind from you're description is :
Door to hell

As an ATS Staff Member, I will not moderate in threads such as this where I have participated as a member.



reply posted on 16-2-2013 @ 03:47 PM by mclinking
reply to post by FireballStorm



There are a lot more random dots. But in reality, they are not 'random'. Let's call them dots of reality. Take this dot 'Phage', a sort of cross between a pharoah and a herb : one decrees and the other bit savours the meal dished up. Since not one person down here knows all, one day 'all' will really happen and nobody left to be any the wiser.



reply posted on 16-2-2013 @ 03:53 PM by hesse
reply to post by defcon5



Haha, ok I got fooled. Some idiot renamed that video to russian meteor impact crater or something like that. I havent seen the original video so thats why it shocked me. Thanks a lot for clearing that up guys!! I feel relieved.
edit on 16-2-2013 by hesse because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 16-2-2013 @ 04:02 PM by defcon5
reply to post by Phage

The following is my opinion as a member participating in this discussion.

Seriously phage....
You expect folks to read headlines like this:
Mass extinction comes every 62 million years, UC physicists discover

And yet fault them because of this:

It shows extinctions of some species of marine animals on a 62 million year cycle.

the rate of extinction has varied from 70% at the highest to 15% at the lowest. There are also peaks of extinction which miss the cycle entirely and points on the cycle which do not peak.

Like everyone sits all day in their “white tower of science” combing over scientific “case law” looking for flaws in others logic.

The fault lays squarely with the scientists and institutions who make these spectacular “headlines” if there is something wrong with their “research”, not with members here who believe and repeat what these scientific organizations release as facts...

From what Wiki states, the court is still out, and there are arguments for both sides of this theory:

It has been suggested variously that extinction events occurred periodically, every 26 to 30 million years,[21] or that diversity fluctuates episodically every ~62 million years.[22] Various ideas attempt to explain the supposed pattern, including the presence of a hypothetical companion star to the sun,[23] [24] oscillations in the galactic plane, or passage through the Milky Way's spiral arms.[25] However, other authors have concluded the data on marine mass extinctions do not fit with the idea that mass extinctions are periodic, or that ecosystems gradually build up to a point at which a mass extinction is inevitable.[4] Many of the proposed correlations have been argued to be spurious.[26][27] Others have argued that there is strong evidence supporting periodicity in a variety of records, [28] and additional evidence in the form of coincident periodic variation in nonbiological geochemical variables.



As an ATS Staff Member, I will not moderate in threads such as this where I have participated as a member.



reply posted on 16-2-2013 @ 04:06 PM by steve95988
looks as though that explosion measured a 4.0

earthquake.usgs.gov...



4.0 Date-Time Friday, February 15, 2013 at 03:20:26 UTC Friday, February 15, 2013 at 08:20:26 AM at epicenter Location 55.150°N, 61.410°E Depth 0 km (~0 mile) (poorly constrained) Region URAL MOUNTAINS REGION, RUSSIA Distances 6 km (4 miles) S (185°) from Chelyabinsk, Russia 113 km (70 miles) E (90°) from Zlatoust, Russia 150 km (94 miles) S (190°) from Kamensk-Uralskiy, Russia 802 km (499 miles) NW (307°) from ASTANA (Tselinograd), Kazakhstan Location Uncertainty horizontal +/- 999.9 km (621.3 miles); depth +/- 999.9 km (621.3 miles) Parameters Nph= 0, Dmin=0 km, Rmss=0 sec, Gp= 0, M-type=body wave magnitude (Mb), Version=N Source Magnitude: USGS NEIC (WDCS-D) Location: Special NEIS solution Event ID usc000f7rz



reply posted on 16-2-2013 @ 04:08 PM by jrtallent
reply to post by Phage



Hi,

Here's why I'm relating this back to chem trails: chem trails are a phenomenon that occurs in the sky, and there has been much speculation as to what their purpose is. Meteors are also a phenomenon that occurs in the sky. That's the connection.

To say that flying through a chem trail is the same as flying through a cloud, implies that they are identical. I don't believe a chem trail has the same composition as a cloud.

Most of what I have read and watched about chem trails talks about high aluminum and barium content in the trails, hence the reason I mentioned aluminum.

If you have a hot meteor entering the atmosphere, and it makes contact with a layer of aluminum particles, it could heat up the aluminum to ignition temperature, thereby causing the meteor to burn up sooner than normal.

I'm not stating that this is the case, but putting the theory out there. I acknowledge that the entire chem trail subject is based on speculation, but that is our only option, since we are not being told anything. What we do know for certain is the skies are being sprayed with something.


reply posted on 16-2-2013 @ 04:19 PM by Phage
reply to post by jrtallent


Here's why I'm relating this back to chem trails: chem trails are a phenomenon that occurs in the sky,
Here's where you go wrong. What you are calling "chemtrails" are contrails. Ice crystals which have condensed and frozen.

Most of what I have read and watched about chem trails talks about high aluminum and barium content in the trails, hence the reason I mentioned aluminum.
Then most of what you read and watch is nonsense. You should try reading and watching something factual. There is no evidence that contrails have high concentrations of aluminum and barium.

it could heat up the aluminum to ignition temperature, thereby causing the meteor to burn up sooner than normal.
Do you know how hot a meteor is when it reaches the stratosphere?

What we do know for certain is the skies are being sprayed with something.
No. We do not.
edit on 2/16/2013 by Phage because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 16-2-2013 @ 04:25 PM by Phage
reply to post by defcon5


The fault lays squarely with the scientists and institutions who make these spectacular “headlines” if there is something wrong with their “research”, not with members here who believe and repeat what these scientific organizations release as facts...
No.
The claim we are talking about came from no scientific organization. It came from a site which proclaims "The New Age is Here". A site which completely misrepresents any valid studies and makes a baseless claim about what is really in those studies.

It isn't scientists and institutions which write the headlines, its "the press". And it's the same people who decry "the press" when it says something they don't like who accept it when it says something they do.


reply posted on 16-2-2013 @ 04:26 PM by DangerDeath
www.youtube.com...

There are several videos on Youtube with this experiment.
What happens when you throw hot water at air temperature of -30C?
You can only imagine what a blazing meteor will do when entering atmosphere. Burning meteor will release lots of smoke, depending of compounds that make it, and turn frozen water into visible vapor.


reply posted on 16-2-2013 @ 04:43 PM by Bkrmn
reply to post by Phage



There was still another to pass by on Friday. Are you here just to annoy people? If so, you do a mighty fine job! Tell your boss/es you want a paid vacation, perhaps to the alien base on the other side of the moon? heh!heh!
Good Night!


reply posted on 16-2-2013 @ 04:44 PM by Phage
reply to post by Bkrmn




There was still another to pass by on Friday.

That's the one we are talking about.
Pages: <<  92    93    94    95    96    97    98  >>    ^^TOP^^



Israel angered over IAEA vote on nuclear arsenal
  Posted 13 days ago with 79 member flags
Neil Armstrong dead at age 82 - report
  Posted 17 days ago with 63 member flags
Judge orders release of detained Marine veteran
  Posted 19 days ago with 58 member flags
Birds hold \'funerals\' for dead
  Posted 10 days ago with 55 member flags
TSA agents swarm Ron Paul\'s plane, demand explosives check
  Posted 11 days ago with 47 member flags
Mysterious Changes in Ocean Salt Spur NASA Expedition
  Posted 1 days ago with 36 member flags
Ga. Murder Case Uncovers Terror Plot by Soldiers
  Posted 15 days ago with 32 member flags