posted on Feb, 10 2013 @ 06:06 PM
Talk about agenda's. Because this guy "claims" he was discriminated against we get fools who eat it up like it's automatically true. Or is it
because he gave his approval for all the current political crowd i.e. Obama, Pelosi and Clinton? Then the leap that the officers involved in the
shooting of the woman delivering papers were out to execute the suspect in a hail of gunfire to look good. Way to project on a event none of us know
squat about other then what the media has released. For all of you knocking the op for the article quote, where does Jackson come from to say he
feels Dorner's pain? That comes off to me as condescending. What in Jacksons life compares to Dorners life? Oh right because they are both black.
Forget the fact one is a ex-cop and naval man, while the other is a reverend involved in politics their lives are so similar. Jackson needs the
exposure to overshadow whats up with his son. He is just playing this for his gain. This whole event proves to me the argument for gun control is a
sham. If Dorner got kicked from the LAPD for police brutality why then was he allowed to still own rifles and pistols? And we are seeing in action
why we should not rely on police to protect us, at best those two cops were in a panic and undertrained. Because training is supposed to insert the
reactions for the situation you trained for. At the worst the two cops were gunning to make names for themselves and training be damned. That is
what we the disarmed populace gets protected by and neither of those two reasons I gave are good news. I find that people are actually rooting for
Dorner to be sickening. Nothing warrants the actions he has undertaken. To support them just shows a sick worldview no different from his.