It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by endats01
reply to post by SBMcG
I am sorry to say but do you know your right from your left? The retaining wall is a feature on the left side of Kennedy. The shot of Obama is taken from the left of the President so the features behind him are to Kennedy's right from his photographers angle not the same as the ones seen from the Obama shot. The shots are 180 degrees out off set basically. You do not see the same scene because the angles are opposite.
Originally posted by endats01
reply to post by SBMcG
The retaining wall can be seen in this image from google Earth. It shows the retaining wall as seen in the Kennedy image. Obama is shown at an angle that shows the woods just past the retaining wall to the right of the President.
It is the same range in both images I assure you.
Originally posted by WaterBottle
reply to post by SBMcG
This thread's funny.
Do you guys not realize, all professional photos go through photoshop? They have to be re-sized and minor color corrections etc.
Please educate yourself before making a thread.edit on 3-2-2013 by WaterBottle because: (no reason given)
the CEO of Browning, Travis Hall, as saying of the shotgun pictured in the Camp David photo: ”I am fairly sure it is a Browning Citori.” The Times writes: “As the president is left handed, it could be the 12 gauge Citori 625 Sporting Golden Clays, adjustable comb, left hand. It features a gold engraving of a game bird transforming into a clay target on the receiver and retails for $4,799.
Originally posted by SBMcG
Originally posted by WaterBottle
reply to post by SBMcG
This thread's funny.
Do you guys not realize, all professional photos go through photoshop? They have to be re-sized and minor color corrections etc.
Please educate yourself before making a thread.edit on 3-2-2013 by WaterBottle because: (no reason given)
I'm not discounting that possibility. What I'm questioning is the content and intent of the photo coupled with the likely alteration in one form or another via Photoshop, with a certain political expediency.
To me this has a Fast-and-Furious, Benghazi, stink to it...
Originally posted by opethPA
So? Its the President, I would have been more surprised if that picture was not touched up in someway.
Originally posted by GogoVicMorrow
I created a thread on the subject that the W.H. didn't want the photo to be manipulated (and encouraged people to do so ), but mods came in, removed the photoshops and promptly closed the thread down and it has yet to be reopened. Apparently they are a little paranoid around here and it as to be ascertained as to whether the W.H. actually has any recourse.
I, personally believe (and believe that it is true) that any photos put forth by the W.H. are in the public domain, and even regardless to that fact it isn't illegal to manipulate the photo and display it if there is no profit to be made. It's really a shame because I was hoping to inspire higher quality out of ATS members and have them open up P.S. and create some original content. ATS born.
My (hopefully temporarily) comatose thread : here