a reply to:
Shoujikina
My post got a bit long, and I STILL didn't reach the point, so I will continue here.
So, what IS a crazy, how can you label, define or diagnoze someone in a SUREFIRE way to be either sane or insane?
Obviously reality-based things wouldn't always work, as we experience reality differently ANYWAY, and measurable reality is not often identical to how
even the most nihilistic scientist types experience reality.
The 'experts' try to claim that 'excess' is insanity, but how the heck do you even define that? Aren't there extremely naturally talkative people, and
at the same time, extremely shy and silent types as well, and who is to say which of them is more mentally healthy? Maybe they're equal, just
different personalities?
If you see pink unicorns or elephants where others don't see them?
Maybe, but isn't it possible you're simply seeing something that DOES exist, but others are not able to perceive? After all, we al perceive things
differently, AND some people are more sensitive to different realities and auras and such (although you can train yourself to not only feel auras, but
also see them, and that can yield surprising, bright and massive results).
I have thought about this question a lot, and I don't have a clear answer. Sometimes you can understand that someone is not functioning on all
cylinders, when they start explaining weird things and foaming at the mouth.
I have come up with a COUPLE of ways to diagnose if someone is crazy.
1) If they expect you to take as normal, as fact, or just believe something they should KNOW would sound insanely implausible or crazy to other
people. It's not that WHAT they say is crazy, it's the EXPECTATION that others will find it normal that is crazy.
2) IF they want to murder, harm or injure other people, especially without a strong emotion, like anger, or any kind of good reason or motivation (not
that there can really be a GOOD reason to do that kind of stuff). Wanting to harm others is insanity in my opinion, but not in governments' opinion.
They think standing armies are natural, soldiers are SOMEHOW not murderers and thus breaking the law, drone operators are just normal people and not
completely sick psychopaths, and so on.
So I wouldn't say someone is crazy because they see people that aren't there. I would say someone is crazy if they expect me to BELIEVE they see
people that aren't there, and don't even take into account that I might NOT believe them without really good explanation or some kind of proof or
demonstration (and I still wouldn't, because I don't practice 'believing' anyway, but I could take it as a possibility, if they give me a good reason
to do so).
It's a dangerous (but probably pragmatic) route to think that someone is crazy if they say something that's just not possible, like they know all the
bus drivers in Tokyo or something like that. However, they might be some kind of remote-viewing expert that has spent years 'viewing' Tokyo bus
drivers.
As I have hopefully proven, this question is more difficult than it seems, and I certainly don't have a clear, simple answer. Usually it's more like
'I know it when I see or hear it'. That's the best I can do right now.