It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
A Texas lawmaker says he plans to file the Firearms Protection Act, which would make any federal laws that may be passed by Congress or imposed by Presidential order which would ban or restrict ownership of semi-automatic firearms or limit the size of gun magazines illegal in the state, 1200 WOAI news reports. Republican Rep. Steve Toth says his measure also calls for felony criminal charges to be filed against any federal official who tries to enforce the rule in the state.
"If a federal official comes into the state of Texas to enforce the federal executive order, that person is subject to criminal prosecution," Toth told 1200 WOAI's Joe Pags Tuesday. He says his bill would make attempting to enforce a federal gun ban in Texas punishable by a $50,000 fine and up to five years in prison.
Toth says he will file his measure after speaking with the state's Republican Attorney General, Greg Abbott, who has already vowed to fight any federal measures which call for restrictions on weapons possession. Toth concedes that he would welcome a legal fight over his proposals.
"At some point there needs to be a showdown between the states and the federal government over the Supremacy Clause," he said.
The Supremacy Clause is the portion of the Constitution which declares that federal laws and statutes are 'the supreme law of the land.'
"It is our responsibility to push back when those laws are infringed by King Obama," Toth said.
Texas is the second state to propose a measure to shield the state from the impact of any gun possession restrictions imposed by Congress or by Presidential order. A similar measure was introduced in Wyoming last week.
Originally posted by randomname
if they feel so strongly about it they should pass it.
it's their state, it's their elected officials.
but that's how civil wars start.
when men in uniform start firing at other men in uniform, then it's war.
then that's when allies are formed and combatant's clearly separated.
states will chose sides. maybe someone from alabama will not fire on someone from texas, will not obey orders from washington. and form a second confederacy.
it's civil war 2 with much more devastating weapons. each state will take control of it's respective national guard and attack government forts in their state. probably after giving them time to chose a side.
it's always been said the only ones that could defeat america are americans themselves.
old wounds could be opened easily in the south, especially with a black president giving them orders.
the south could rise again, and out of the ashes the nwo.
Originally posted by jessejamesxx
I feel like statements like "king Obama" are detriments to their cause. Fight it legally and don't let emotions or personal feelings make you a target. Other than that, I like that states are making a stand and I hope it's a trend.
Originally posted by newcovenant
reply to post by eXia7
Did Texas pass strict gun laws too?
I thought it was just NY.
Wow.
I never would have expected that.
Wait....they didn't?
Oh then this is just another big blowhard talking out his arse trying to gain political and NRA support for doing something that's never gonna happen. Comical really. Texas is like another country unto itself. Funny people. Big hats.
Originally posted by newcovenant
reply to post by eXia7
Oh then this is just another big blowhard talking out his arse trying to gain political and NRA support for doing something that's never gonna happen. Comical really. Texas is like another country unto itself. Funny people. Big hats.
Originally posted by zedVSzardoz
reply to post by eXia7
Texas is right in doing this. The supremacy clause only pertains to CONSTITUTIONALY ASCRIBED POWERS. It does not give the federal government the power to do as it pleases. ALL treaties and laws still apply and so does state sovereignty. If the government wants to pass unconstitutional laws, the supremacy clause DOES NOT APPLY.
The purpose of the supremacy clause is to protect federal constitutionaly granted powers that ALREADY exist. Not grant new ones or overturn state authority within its own borders.
The federal government only has jurisdiction in DC. PERIOD.
They know this though, and now so do you.
edit on 15-1-2013 by zedVSzardoz because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by schuyler
Originally posted by newcovenant
reply to post by eXia7
Oh then this is just another big blowhard talking out his arse trying to gain political and NRA support for doing something that's never gonna happen. Comical really. Texas is like another country unto itself. Funny people. Big hats.
Never been to Texas, have you? This is a Texas State Legislator who will introduce a bill to nullify any Federal gun control laws. Most bills never make it out of committee, but this one has potential because a whole lot of Texans feel the same way. if it passes, along with similar proposed legislation in Montana, Wyoming, Tennessee, and elsewhere, then we may have an interesting situation.
edit on 1/15/2013 by schuyler because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by grey580
reply to post by eXia7
Why stop there?
Just make open carry legal.
In fact make it mandatory that every single adult over 18 must carry a weapon on him/her at all times.
Got a truck? You must have a gun rack with a rifle on it.
edit on 16-1-2013 by grey580 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by newcovenant
reply to post by schuyler
My point exactly.
Guess which half is more liberal and progressive?