It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by itbenickp
Originally posted by SpearMint
Originally posted by itbenickp
Originally posted by SpearMint
Originally posted by ajay59
Originally posted by SpearMint
Well his belittling of the constitution is quite justified. It's outdated and treated like no one would be free without it. It could be destroyed today and there would be no difference, if anything it's a hindrance because it blinds people from reality while they protect their "freedom".
If you have a problem with this country and the documents that created it, don't let the door hit you in the azz while leaving it! You are a traitor to this nation if you believe what you say to be true!edit on 12-1-2013 by ajay59 because: (no reason given)
Lucky I don't live in the US then isn't it? If I did though it wouldn't make a me a traitor, what I said is true.
No its not, while you are welcome to your opinion, it does not mean it is the truth. And belittling the Constituition of the United States while you are a guest in the United States is pretty ignorant. Add to the fact that he said that after spouting off about "his" 1st amendment rights while advocating gun control which infringes on the 2nd amendment. If the Constituition means nothing too him then "his" 1st amendment rights mean nothing. Meaning he has no right to saything about the whole damn thing.
Then explain how it is not.
Myself and many others have explained why its not, yet all you come back with is "its all irrelevant" How many people of the world know that the United States has a constituition? A vast majority can we agree? How many People of the world know about the founding documents of any other country? A minority? It is the most famous document (apart from the bible) EVER WRITTEN. And its irrelevant?
Originally posted by Honor93
reply to post by SpearMint
maybe not but [color=amber]the Beauty of the 2nd Amendment is that it will not be needed until they try to take it -- Thomas Jefferson.
This is something that people can't seem to get their head around, if they wanted to, the 2nd amendment WOULDN'T STOP THEM.
come and get it big boy
Originally posted by itbenickp
reply to post by SpearMint
Ok, snap your fingers and make all the copies disappear. But it would not be gone, because it lives in me, in my heart, in my soul. I swwore to uphold and defend it, and will so til the day i die. See to Constituitionalists like myself, its not a piece of paper, its an ideal, its a way of life. Something that i am finding you just do not understand. Is having a principle irellevant? Because that what the Constituition is, a set of principles, ideals, a way to live, the way to govern. Just because America has (admittedly) gotten off track does not mean that it is irrelevant. The U.S has dont its best to Destroy the Constituition, yet the Constituition has dont nothing but try to Strengthen America.
Originally posted by Honor93
reply to post by SpearMint
so, you're suggesting that we should come to your doorstep and make every effort to change your culture ?? and if so, would that be an invitation ?
or is it only ok when it's others doing it to us ??
I would be particularly interested in finding out the extent of the pre war perception of the Red Menace,
If our schools and universities cared about history, Anne Applebaum's magisterial work, Gulag would be required reading. Not because our children need to master the enormous body of detail concerning the infamous Soviet forced-labor system — made famous by Solzhenitsyn's works some 30 years ago — but because it is only by working their way through the chilling details, year by year and camp by camp, that they can begin to understand the horrors of Communism and the magnitude of our successful war against it.
Like Hitler's slave-labor and extermination camps, the Soviet Gulag was the symbol of the regime. Like the Nazi camps, the Soviet ones started to solve a particular political problem — how to eliminate unwanted elements from the society at large — and then took on a life of their own, sometimes becoming the driving force of policy rather than a tool of it. The horrors found underneath the rocks of silence that long protected both systems from public examination are similar, and I rather think that anyone who analyzes such a phenomenon is compelled to write
Approximately 14 million people passed through the Gulag "labour camps" from 1929 to 1953. A further 6-7 million were deported and exiled to remote areas of the USSR, and 4-5 million passed through "labour colonies".[11] The total population of the camps varied from 510,307 in 1934 to 1,727,970 in 1953.[6]
Most Gulag inmates were not political prisoners, although significant numbers of political prisoners could be found in the camps at any one time.[16] Petty crimes and jokes about the Soviet government and officials were punishable by imprisonment.[17][18] About half of political prisoners in the Gulag camps were imprisoned without trial;
Originally posted by Honor93
reply to post by SpearMint
it appears to be working well for the last 200+ years, why wouldn't it ?
oh, that's right ... you'd prefer we can't defend ourselves ... thanks but NO thanks.
Originally posted by Honor93
reply to post by SpearMint
when did this topic change from Piers and the 2nd Amendment to drug interventions ??
having a relapse are ya ?
why quibble over a 'maybe' ... they've been outed before, perhaps it's time to out them again ?
Maybe secret behind-closed-doors Communists are behind the NDAA and other means of going around our Constitution
Originally posted by Honor93
reply to post by SpearMint
hmmm, i wasn't wandering around 200yrs ago, were you ?
then why don't we leave those tales to the history keepers, eh ?
blah, blah, blah ... BS and you know it.
find someone less knowing to dump that load on ... it's not me.
gatling guns were invented, employed, exercised and revered nearly 100yrs AFTER the Constitution was ratified ... i'm pretty sure they took such considerations into account when they wrote it.
you can doubt them all you want, i don't.