It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by HairlessApe
Originally posted by ManBehindTheMask
reply to post by _BoneZ_
FFs................THEY WERE NOT ASSAULT RIFLES!
These friggin people need to STOP parroting that they are ASSUALT rifles they are NOT assault files!
A rapid-fire, magazine-fed automatic rifle designed for infantry use
they are semi automatic rifles........with a different COVER then a wooden stock.........THATS IT!
If people who are pro gun would start correcting this freaking false terminology then MAYBE we could get an honest damn discussion
Now.. I haven't really looked into Sandy Hook. I don't look into any massacres, because I can't do anything about them. But if I'm not mistaken, I've heard he used an AR-15, right?
Doesn't that stand for Assault Rifle 15?
Originally posted by ThirdEyeofHorus
Originally posted by SpearMint
Originally posted by ThirdEyeofHorus
Originally posted by SpearMint
Originally posted by Max_TO
reply to post by SpearMint
Congrats Piers , you have successfully derailed the thread !
Is it possible to derail a thread by talking about the thread topic?
Congrats, you just added absolutely nothing to it.edit on 12-1-2013 by SpearMint because: (no reason given)
For real... are you really trying to suggest that America needs the British to step in and disarm us as an intervention?
all I can say is OMG
No, I haven't even suggested that.
oops I put the wrong quote. This one will make more sense in regards to my post
When someone is destroying their self with drugs others step in, it's not always welcome. It's harder when there's 300 million of them though, probably should just let it happen.
So tell me, what did you think 300 million Americans need intervention for, if it wasn't gun control?
PIERS: ...And I can go blow up a movie theater. Do you think that's right?
SHAPIRO: Well we can talk drug laws another time--
Originally posted by Honor93
reply to post by SpearMint
do you mean cannons like we STILL have today ?
those cannons ?
yeah, ok ... all of this coming from a pair of know nothings ... typical.
if Piers is your leader, please re-call him ... sooner better than later.
Cannons aren't something citizens could have and are even more inconvenient.
A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.
Originally posted by Honor93
reply to post by SpearMint
what are you going on about ?
and, why can't recall your own posts ??
[oh yeah, you mentioned something about drug intervention]
not surprising. circle-jerks (all of them) work that way.
here ya go, then please explain what are you going on about ...
Cannons aren't something citizens could have and are even more inconvenient.
guess you're a little slow as cannons have been around practically forever (in American history)
do tell, what does your comment have to do with Piers ?
did our "little book" have a picture of one on it or what ?
If you can't see the difference between guns with a short range and no rifling that shoot pellets and take a minute to reload and modern weapons in a higher population density then I'm wasting my time talking to you. Cannons aren't something citizens could have and are even more inconvenient.
Pay attention. Someone else (you, I think) brought up cannons, I was saying how inconvenient they were back then for a citizen to use and are therefore completely irrelevant
I think that the people calling to deport PM are wrong and not seeing the point. Deporting him is not the right course of action
Originally posted by SpearMint
Originally posted by Honor93
reply to post by SpearMint
what are you going on about ?
and, why can't recall your own posts ??
[oh yeah, you mentioned something about drug intervention]
not surprising. circle-jerks (all of them) work that way.
here ya go, then please explain what are you going on about ...
Cannons aren't something citizens could have and are even more inconvenient.
guess you're a little slow as cannons have been around practically forever (in American history)
do tell, what does your comment have to do with Piers ?
did our "little book" have a picture of one on it or what ?
Pay attention. Someone else (you, I think) brought up cannons, I was saying how inconvenient they were back then for a citizen to use and are therefore completely irrelevant. As they are today, I don't know why you even brought it up, but then nothing else you say really makes sense so it fits right in I suppose...
Talking to you is brain numbing.edit on 13-1-2013 by SpearMint because: (no reason given)
13) Additional Terms And Conditions For Members Summary: The below specific and itemized rules not withstanding, all Users and members are expected to participate with the same common every-day social graces used in civilized mixed company. Our desire is to foster an environment of civil decorum that enables our members to discuss highly provocative and intensely speculative topics without concern over personal attacks or insults.