It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
On the second anniversary of a mass shooting in Arizona that wounded Giffords and killed six others, the couple launched a political action committee, Americans for Responsible Solutions, along with a website calling for contributions to help "encourage elected officials to stand up for solutions to prevent gun violence and protect responsible gun ownership."
Ban fertilizers?
As a Western woman and a Persian Gulf War combat veteran who have exercised our Second Amendment rights, we don't want to take away your guns any more than we want to give up the two guns we have locked in a safe at home.
What we do want is what the majority of NRA members and other Americans want: responsible changes in our laws to require responsible gun ownership and reduce gun violence.
Weapons designed for the battlefield have a home in our streets.
Americans for Responsible Solutions, which we are launching today, will invite people from around the country to join a national conversation about gun violence prevention, will raise the funds necessary to balance the influence of the gun lobby, and will line up squarely behind leaders who will stand up for what's right.
Originally posted by phishyblankwaters
go ahead and try to purchase enough fertilizer to make an ammonium nitrate bomb. you are immediately placed on a watch list, and will probably be talking to someone from DHS within a few weeks.
Originally posted by phishyblankwaters
reply to post by SeekerofTruth101
Ban fertilizers?
go ahead and try to purchase enough fertilizer to make an ammonium nitrate bomb. you are immediately placed on a watch list, and will probably be talking to someone from DHS within a few weeks.
So this woman is shot in the head and almost killed, and you want to deny her the right to be against guns? don't you see how assinine this all is? You want to trample other peoples protected rights to uphold one you prefer?
If this woman wants to be against guns, what right do you have to tell her otherwise? Until you take a slug to the skull, i think you should just not say a damn word about this woman and her goals.
something here is unconscionable, but it's not Giffords
Originally posted by Tw0Sides
reply to post by SeekerofTruth101
Thanks for bringing up this Info.
This is exactly what needs to Happen.
Not a removal of the 2nd, but something more in line with Modern times.
Since the Muskets were Protected with the Original Writings, Weaponry has changed, so should the 2nd.
Originally posted by beezzer
Legislating by emotion is wrong, regardless of which side of the issue you are on.
Playing on peoples emotions to further a political agenda is amoral and repugnant, regardless of the side someone is on.
So says the beez
Originally posted by IkNOwSTuff
Sounds like shes just exercising her first amendment rights to me.
But Im not American so I dont know anything.
I recently visited some Latin American countries that mesh with the N.R.A.’s vision of the promised land, where guards with guns grace every office lobby, storefront, A.T.M., restaurant and gas station. It has not made those countries safer or saner.
As guns proliferate, legally and illegally, innocent people often seem more terrorized than protected.
In Guatemala, riding a public bus is a risky business. More than 500 bus drivers have been killed in robberies since 2007, leading InSight Crime, which tracks organized crime in the Americas, to call it “the most dangerous profession on the planet.” And when bullets start flying, everyone is vulnerable: in 2010 the onboard tally included 155 drivers, 54 bus assistants, 71 passengers and 14 presumed criminals. Some were killed by the robbers’ bullets and some by gun-carrying passengers.
Scientific studies have consistently found that places with more guns have more violent deaths, both homicides and suicides. Women and children are more likely to die if there’s a gun in the house. The more guns in an area, the higher the local suicide rates. “Generally, if you live in a civilized society, more guns mean more death,” said David Hemenway, director of the Harvard Injury Control Research Center. “There is no evidence that having more guns reduces crime. None at all.”