It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Unity_99
Yeah I'd say it looks like a kind of tower too. And isn't it convenient and even very lame/transparent/insulting/twisted, that they immediately invent a camera explanation that anything you would see is an inverted crater high.
Yup, well its certainly a high point, just not what they say, because that is a tower!!!
Originally posted by ntech
reply to post by Human_Alien
Well after looking at a map of the moon and assuming the 2 visible craters are Copernicus and Eratosthenes then what the tower could be is Mons Wolff. A tall mountain. 35 Km or 21 mile high mountain
Wikipedia
Originally posted by JohnnyAnonymous
I get the whole thing with it being classed as the same as a very large mountain..
Originally posted by Manhater
reply to post by Human_Alien
Now that was awesome, Looks like someone taking a stroll on the moon.
Pretty cool...
Now to go read the thread to hear the Lens flare theory.
Originally posted by alfa1
As you can see (and as mentioned earlier by ntech) its just part of the Montes Apenninus mountain range that he is seeing.
Firstly because this guy is not a hoaxer.
So that narrows down the conspiracy field a lot.
Originally posted by tsurfer2000h
reply to post by Human_Alien
Firstly because this guy is not a hoaxer.
First I have to ask how you came to this conclusion?
So that narrows down the conspiracy field a lot.
Secondly, how does that narrow the conspiracy field?
Originally posted by DenyObfuscation
reply to post by Human_Alien
No crater, mountains. Beyond the terminator only high enough elevations reflect the light. No atmosphere or light bending involved.
Originally posted by Human_Alien
And because of this uncertainty (opposed to cooperative consensuses) is why I remain unsure.
And because of this uncertainty (opposed to cooperative consensuses) is why I remain unsure.
Originally posted by DenyObfuscation
reply to post by Human_Alien
And because of this uncertainty (opposed to cooperative consensuses) is why I remain unsure.
Are we looking for the facts or for consensus? Have you looked at the images that show the mountains?
I think you're perspective is being thrown off by this 2D image of a 3D structure.
At least we all agree that the Moon is rotating, slowly but surely..
Originally posted by Human_Alien
Because in 500 years we're all going to look arrogantly foolish anyway. And so it goes...........................