It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by tinhattribunal
'they' [the UNITED STATES CORPORATION] have registered my 'domicile' in WASHINGTON , DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA , a place i have never visited , or intend to visit.
this is a fraudulent practice and , as such , it renders any contract , implied or otherwise, i may , or may not have with the above noticed entity , null and void.
Originally posted by Bildo
If these don't come out right feel free to correctly insert them.
Originally posted by Bildo
Here is another comment containg much information concerning the point I'm trying to make. This takes us from commonlaw to statutes and then to international law.
Now for a little more insight lets look to: 4 U.S.C.S. Sec. 110(d)
Notice here that the United states of america are foreign to the United States.
Evidence that the UNITED STATES is foreign in respect to united States of America is is found in the 5 points as follows:
(1) December 26th 1933 49 Statute 3097 Treaty Series 881 (Convention on Rights and Duties of States) stated CONGRESS replaced STATUTES with international law, placing all States under international law.
You can read the whole thing here:
www.rumormillnews.com...
Originally posted by Bildo
Here is another comment containg much information concerning the point I'm trying to make. This takes us from commonlaw to statutes and then to international law.
Now for a little more insight lets look to: 4 U.S.C.S. Sec. 110(d)
Notice here that the United states of america are foreign to the United States.
Evidence that the UNITED STATES is foreign in respect to united States of America is is found in the 5 points as follows:
(1) December 26th 1933 49 Statute 3097 Treaty Series 881 (Convention on Rights and Duties of States) stated CONGRESS replaced STATUTES with international law, placing all States under international law.
(2) December 9th 1945 International Organization Immunities Act relinquished every public office of the United States to the United Nations.
(3) 22 CFR 92.12-92.31 FR Heading “Foreign Relationship” states that an oath is required to take office.
(4) Title 8 USC 1481 stated once an oath of office is taken citizenship is relinquished, thus you become a foreign entity, agency, or state.
That means every public office is a foreign state, including all political subdivisions. (i.e. every single court is considered a separate foreign entity)
(5) Title 22 USC (Foreign Relations and Intercourse) Chapter 11 identifies all public officials as foreign agents.
4 U.S.C.S. Sec. 110(d). The term “State” includes any Territory or possession of the United States. ( Note: the use of the capital “S” in “State” is reference to the designated territorial “States” and possessions held by the Corporate “United States”.)
TITLE 2-- CHAPTER 14 Sec. 431. Definitions
(12) The term ``State'' means a State of the United States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, or a territory or possession of the United States.
Originally posted by CitizenJack
reply to post by rickymouse
Your a yooper so naturally your a Citizen, Im a troll (not the ATS kind for all you non michigan folks) so that makes me a citizen.
Upper case C yooper Lower case C troll
shall lose his nationality by voluntarily performing any of the following acts with the intention of relinquishing United States nationality ... taking an oath or making an affirmation or other formal declaration of allegiance to a foreign state or a political subdivision thereof" (Source). That's a very specific circumstance, which your source seems to have disregarded.
TITLE 2-- CHAPTER 14 Sec. 431. Definitions
12) The term ``State'' means a State of the United States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, or a territory or possession of the United States.
"When used in this Act" being the key words that your source chose to omit. (Source) The Act in question is the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971. Not sure what this section is supposed to prove, just pointing out another little deception.
Originally posted by j2000
reply to post by Bildo
Nope, just that one quote from that site.
For the purpose of the case, it was explained to the court that the IRS wasn't defined as an "agency," it was a "bureau" within the Department of the Treasury (which is the "agency") Try this link: www.losthorizons.com...
1. The IRS is Not a US government agency. It is an agency of the IMF (International Monetary Fund) (Diversified Metal Products v I.R.S et al. CV-93-405E-EJE U.S.D.C.D.I., Public Law 94-564, Senate report 94-1148 pg. 5967, Reorganization Plan No. 26, Public Law 102-391)
www.presidency.ucsb.edu...
5. The United States does not have any employees because there is no longer a United States! No more reorganizations. After over 200 years of bankruptcy it is finally over. (Executive Order 12803) Executive order 12803 was promulgated by Bush to encourage local units of government to explore privatization of some activities when it might be more efficient. It has nothing to do with ending the US.
Of course, FRC says nothing of the kind. Here's the syllabus with links to the actual case.
8. There are NO Judicial Courts in America and have not been since 1789. Judges do not enforce Statutes and Codes. Executive Administrators enforce Statutes and Codes. (FRC v. GE 281 US 464 Keller v. PE 261 US 428, 1 Stat 138-178)
9. There have NOT been any judges in America since 1789. There have just been administrators. (FRC v. GE 281 US 464 Keller v. PE 261 US 428 1 Stat. 138-178)
Our conclusion is that the proceeding in that court was not a case or controversy in the sense of the judiciary article, but was an administrative proceeding, and therefore that the decision therein is not reviewable by this Court.
Originally posted by rickymouse
Originally posted by CitizenJack
reply to post by rickymouse
Your a yooper so naturally your a Citizen, Im a troll (not the ATS kind for all you non michigan folks) so that makes me a citizen.
Upper case C yooper Lower case C troll
How come there is more water above the bridge than below the bridge? We must have more C shore hereedit on 6-1-2013 by rickymouse because: (no reason given)
What FRC said is that if some administrative agency makes a decision, then it's a problem for the administrators unless there is some legal question that needs to be resolved by a court.
I just went to the site you sourced: supreme.justia.com... and saw what you missed. It does say what was quoted, you have to SEE it:
"Our conclusion is that the proceeding in that court was not a case or controversy in the sense of the judiciary article, but was an administrative proceeding, and therefore that the decision therein is not reviewable by this Court."
Administrative not judicial. There's a difference. They are administering under the bankruptcy. I won't go further debunking your debunking. We can throw this kind of stuff back and forth all day, and then some.
Internal Revenue has been a part of the government since 1862, and it's authority has not been successfully questioned.
Bureau, agency. Ok, that still does not take into context the fact that IRS, Dept of Treasury, etc are an actual part or division of the "government". They are separate corporations. Not an office, agency, or bureau of the dejure government. They are mixed in with the corporation United States.