What Was MI6 Team Doing In Paris The Night Princess Diana Died?

reply to post by DoorKnobEddie


Right, so, people are taking this seriously because..."RUSSIAN intelligence agents" say MI6 arrived just before the crash?

Really. This now has proper gravitas because "Russia" says so? I mean, it's not like they lie or deny involvement in killing their own, do they?

Originally posted by DoorKnobEddie
reply to post by broctune

 

You seem to make a lot of assertions. Could please provide some evidence? Thanks.

I don't know anything about Diana. Couldn't care less about her. The whole thing just looks fishy and Diana seemed like she was egging it on by doing things to piss off the Royal family.

Originally posted by noonebutme
reply to post by DoorKnobEddie

 

Right, so, people are taking this seriously because..."RUSSIAN intelligence agents" say MI6 arrived just before the crash?

Really. This now has proper gravitas because "Russia" says so? I mean, it's not like they lie or deny involvement in killing their own, do they?

The Mohamed Al Fayed video and the coroner's court jury judgment and Diana's prediction add gravitas.

I note your avatar is a man with a tin foil hat and your tone aggressive. What is the point in being a member of a conspiracy site while having contempt for conspiracies.

Princess Diana's Death has always been a mystery to me. I remember when she died, even people out here in rural Oklahoma were sad about her death. I remember not understanding why everybody was so upset about a member of the British Royal Family dieing (I was only 10 at the time).

Years later, when I first started get into conspiracies, I found a post, probably here, about her death and it got me thinking. Here was a woman loved the world over who, while being royalty, had kinda had a rough go at life because she was married to the next in line to the throne. The Queen had been sort of awful towards her because of the divorce from Charles.

Then, she has be quoted to have said that she feared for her life, but never from whom. Then, she had kind of been out of the news for a while, and suddenly, she is killed, seemingly out of nowhere. It has always seemed strange to me that someone of such high profile was killed so suddenly. Everybody in the car died. Most have said they weren't wearing seatbelts, probably true. However, seatbelts are easy to make faulty. You can cut one across with a razor, not all the way through, but enough to weaken, and they will break. You can loosen the bolts that hold them down, or you can file the heads off of the pins that hold them together. Also, is it that common for Paparazzi to chase a target so recklessly? I don't know, but I guess it's possible.

From all I know about it, it was probably just an accident. However, remember, if the MI5 wanted somebody dead, they would make it look like an accident. Those guys are professionals, and they are good at what they do. If three senior agents were responsible, then it would be very hard to prove, or even speculate otherwise.

Thanks for posting the link to that documentary Christian Jihad. Just finished watching it.

Very interesting and very eye opening. I had always thought that the inquiry jury ruled accidental death. Just shows how easily mainstream media can change history basically. I suppose it's also ignorance on my part as I never really looked into this conspiracy..., I did a little after it first happened, but then I just figured oh well they got her. Very sad.

But to see in that documentary that the Mohammed Al Fayed was actually vindicated by the inquests' jury's verdict was something I was totally unaware of. Probably again.., because I was mis-informed and I also didn't look into it.

Originally posted by Nola213
But to see in that documentary that the Mohammed Al Fayed was actually vindicated by the inquests' jury's verdict was something I was totally unaware of.

Well, the jury stated:

the jury concluded that Diana and Dodi were unlawfully killed by the "grossly negligent driving of the following vehicles and of the Mercedes" adding that additional factors were "the impairment of the judgment of the driver of the Mercedes through alcohol" and "the death of the deceased was caused or contributed to by the fact that the deceased was not wearing a seat-belt, the fact that the Mercedes struck the pillar in the Alma Tunnel, rather than colliding with something else".[

Originally posted by DoorKnobEddie
I note your avatar is a man with a tin foil hat and your tone aggressive. What is the point in being a member of a conspiracy site while having contempt for conspiracies.

I note your incorrect assumption at an aggressive tone - it isn't, the internet is a poor conduit for emotion via text and what you interpret is your own view, but aggression is not what was conveyed. Perhaps you have anger in your inner goddess...?

My avatar is a chosen picture that makes me laugh, simple as.

Why am I a member of a conspiracy site while having contempt for conspiracies? Because not everything is a conspiracy; not everything is the result of some shadowy, made up organisation or elitist group. And you need people like me to help keep some of the lunatic fringes "grounded" in reality. Not fantasy.

It is interesting that the 2007 inquest was into the deaths of Princess Diana and Dodi Fayad only.

The death of the driver of the vehicle, Henri Paul, didn't come under scrutiny at that time, apparently. That strikes me as very odd, especially considering all the alleged inconsistencies related to his blood tests.

I leave the readers with the archive of the inquest:

webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk...://www.scottbaker-inquests.gov.uk/hearing_tran.index.htm

reply to post by SilentKoala


"I'm sure it was for a different reason...
There's no logical reason why ATS would actively suppress information or theories about Diana's death "

1 how can you be so sure?

2 how can you be so sure when entire posts are removed before you even got to them ? ^^ or thread clsoed for further review ^^

reply to post by DoorKnobEddie


"She was engaged to a Muslim and pregnant with his child. Could you imagine the future king of England having a Muslim half brother? "

bingo! thats exactly why.

but now they have the perfect couple ( oh how sweet )

MI6 are in most capital cities, it is their job.
Did you notice the guy who claims this is selling a book....go on fall for it and buy a copy

reply to post by ~widowmaker~


Completely agree - there was a lot of speculation that Di was indeed pregnant, and if i remember correctly, there were even eyewitness accounts of her being very much alive at the scene, but Im not sure about the credibiity of either claim.

Excited to make my first post on a thread! ( newbie here)

Originally posted by ipsedixit
It is interesting that the 2007 inquest was into the deaths of Princess Diana and Dodi Fayad only.

Just why do you think the UK would hold a inquest for someone who was a Frenchman, working in France

Thank you, Christian Jihad, for posting the documentary. I can certainly see why the Royals want it erased from existence.

The film presents a few excellent theories as to why Diana was murdered. I didn't know she was making leaps and bounds in getting land mines banned. It was interesting to learn that even Bill Clinton took notice of this and spoke about the need to have them banned. Then, when the meeting happened after her death, even those who were on Diana's side voted against having land mines banned. Turn coats!

Even if Diana wasn't pregnant, although I'm leaning towards believing Dodi's father that she was, they wouldn't have wanted to have a Muslim step father for her boys since going to war with the Middle East had most likely already been planned and in the works. Since all young men in the UK have to fight, I'm sure it would've raised some problems with the princes if they loved their step father and half brother or sister and were against going to war with Muslims. Like we're hearing now about Prince Harry having a field day killing over there and they've even nicknamed him the Jackal.

Another thing is that Diana's life was devoted to love. She was incapable of living a lie and spoke out very much about the darkness surroundng the Royals. She didn't like the way they were and I believe she felt regret for marrying into a family devoid of love. When she met Dodi, he treated her like a true princess and the warmth he provided her was real. Unlike the psychopath she married and his ultra sick family. Maybe Diana was made to believe that she was loved by her royal beau at least until she was married and impregnated, but then the facade came crashing down. I admire her for getting out of her marriage and living for love instead of wealth. I honestly believe that living for money and material gains is what keeps you coming back to this world and never moving on to a more important role in a brighter, more peacveful dimension unlike this Earthly plane.

reply to post by Vidpci


I think there's a lot more to that story on top of them showing off retards.

Originally posted by noonebutme
reply to post by DoorKnobEddie

 

Right, so, people are taking this seriously because..."RUSSIAN intelligence agents" say MI6 arrived just before the crash?

Really. This now has proper gravitas because "Russia" says so? I mean, it's not like they lie or deny involvement in killing their own, do they?

The afferdavit of Richard Tomlinson, ex MI6 also mentions the arrival of 2 x MI6 staff in Paris, although they didnt seem to be as official as the Russian claims.

Been some really interesting articles on this thread! Like others on here, I was returning from an all nighter rounded off at the Casino and in the Taxi home the news was breaking. I never really bought the conspiracy bit, sure I considered it, but always thought, accident.

On the M Henri Paul Carbo Monoxide levels, could it be possible that he was still breathing for some minutes after the crash and was getting carbon monixide from the exhaust fumes?

The one abiding mystery for me was the damage done to the car.

This was a Mercedes-Benz S280, a very powerful, sturdy, German car, not some Reliant Robin.

How in the hell did it sustain all that front end damage?

I don't think it's possible that it could have been travelling sufficiently fast to have sustained that level of damage in that tunnel.

Originally posted by CJCrawley
How in the hell did it sustain all that front end damage?

Easily, a heavy car driving at speed hits a reinforced concrete column, which one do you think would win?

MI6 operate world wide, its not unusual for them to be distributed throughout Europe. I think the pressence of MI6 proves nothing. The style in which the accident occured is not something I would link to a secret service hit, as there is no 100% gurantee of success, they operate in the realms of total success not "yeah that should be enough to do it". Besides, if you knew how many foreign agencies operate in this country, you would be shocked, as well as just how many murders take place on British soil by foreign agents, again they're easy to spot but the government don't want you to know that what they action abroad actually happens just as much here on our own soil so the general public never get to know the true reality of "spy world hits". Not saying Princess Di was not a hit of sorts, but the reports of MI6 agents in Paris at the time, in my mind and experience, proves nothing.

person is not born a Muslim and a Christian Krishnas .do not confuse religion with genetics, /.creature wear a mask of any religion, race and nation.it dodik arabian blue blood & diana blue blood lizzard & nimpho...