What Was MI6 Team Doing In Paris The Night Princess Diana Died?

page: 4
29
<< 1  2  3    5  6  7 >>

log in

join

posted on Jan, 2 2013 @ 06:07 AM
link   

Originally posted by hellobruce

Originally posted by DoorKnobEddie
She was engaged to a Muslim and pregnant with his child.


She was not engaged, nor was she pregnant.... apart from that your post is accurate!


Dodi's father thought she was.




posted on Jan, 2 2013 @ 06:09 AM
link   

Originally posted by hellobruce

Originally posted by DoorKnobEddie
Diana said that she was in danger, that dark forces were after her.


That was Dodi's father....


No. She told her personal butler many times that she feared for her life. As much as I don't care for the butler, I do believe that much.



posted on Jan, 2 2013 @ 06:15 AM
link   

Originally posted by antonia
reply to post by fastbob72
 


Well, I don't think she was a bad person. I get a lot of flack from the cult of Diana because I don't really think Charles is a bad person either. I think he just made a poor choice when he didn't tell his dad to get stuffed decades ago when he wanted to marry Camilla. I think he did try with Diana but it was doomed from the start. She was always insecure and he really only married out of duty.

As foul as their relationship got toward the end I don't think he ever wanted her dead. She was a good mother to his children and he publicly acknowledged that often. She was prone to making reckless choices in her life but most people only hear the good things.

I think Diana like most smart celebrities was a master of media manipulation. It also helps that she is dead. Dying young is probably the best way to make people forget all your faults. If she was still alive I doubt people would have the same opinion of her.
edit on 1-1-2013 by antonia because: opps


Charles was incredibly abusive with Diana, and allowed the family to abuse her as well. I don't think he's some great guy at all. She married way too young, never had the chance to mature properly. If she acted child like, it's more than likely due to the emotional abuse she suffered. She didn't just come by that behavior on her own.

Really it's too bad that Charles couldn't be a man and just not..... you know, cheat on his wife? Perhaps if he had treated her with an ounce of respect, she may not have felt the need to look beyond her own marriage too. Very sad situation, but I will not blame Diana for it. She was used.



posted on Jan, 2 2013 @ 07:31 AM
link   
reply to post by ignorant_ape
 


From my memory ( and its a bit sketchy tonight) the only survivor (the bodyguard) said there were 3 journalists chasing them, 1 motorbike with 2 people no it & 1 in a fiat car.



posted on Jan, 2 2013 @ 07:40 AM
link   

Originally posted by Thunder heart woman


Charles was incredibly abusive with Diana, and allowed the family to abuse her as well.


Says who? Diana. That's the point. She was a master at making herself look good. That's point the other poster and I were making. I tend to take the position that both of the parties involved did childish, manipulative crap and if you really knew anything about the woman beyond her autobiography you would know that. No, she's not going to come out and make herself look bad. You believe what you want, it's your right, but I'm not so easily taken in by anyone. Like I said, I don't think she was a bad person, but she got caught making up crap to stir things up several times so it is what it is.



If she acted child like, it's more than likely due to the emotional abuse she suffered. She didn't just come by that behavior on her own.


Nope, you know little about the woman. She acted like that before she ever met Charles according to most of her family and it stemmed from her absent relationship with her father John Spencer.


Really it's too bad that Charles couldn't be a man and just not..... you know, cheat on his wife?


Yep he did, and she did too. Many of her friends even say she stepped out first.


Perhaps if he had treated her with an ounce of respect, she may not have felt the need to look beyond her own marriage too.


And into the marriages of other people like Oliver Hoare?



Very sad situation, but I will not blame Diana for it. She was used.


So I guess a nasty divorce give you clearance to be as silly as you want? I guess it's because I'm getting old, but I just am not going to pick a side here. When I look at the relationship I don't see any antagonists. I see two adults who made bad choices. No need to hate anyway, no need to pick a winner. It just was what it was.

Either way, there is no proof she was preggers beyond Dodi's father and frankly, I don't think he was being honest.
edit on 2-1-2013 by antonia because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 2 2013 @ 07:43 AM
link   
reply to post by fastbob72
 


Don't you think if one was so 'good at playing the victim' maybe she was just that, a victim. It's like someone who commits suicide, afterwards family & friends come out saying that they knew something was wrong but didn't realise it was a cry for help, in this case she could have been crying out for help but no one was listening.



posted on Jan, 2 2013 @ 08:32 AM
link   


Just goes to show being driven at speed by a drunk driver whilst not wearing a seatbelt is not safe.
reply to post by hellobruce
 


Henri Paul was not drunk. Camera footage of him waiting in the hotel lobby just before the crash betray the drunk driver theory completely, with him showing none of the physical effects of inebriation.

Henri Paul, the first "covert drunk" in history; walks sober, talks completely sober, only drives like a drunk.



posted on Jan, 2 2013 @ 08:34 AM
link   
ok i found the 'unlawful killing' documentary online

i wont link to it here but i will suggest googling 'unlawful killing online russian website'
the second result
im watching it now




posted on Jan, 2 2013 @ 08:43 AM
link   

Originally posted by DoorKnobEddie

Originally posted by Avgudar
Why was she killed?


She was engaged to a Muslim and pregnant with his child. Could you imagine the future king of England having a Muslim half brother?


Makes a lot of sense really when you consider the older generation of the monarchy were Nazis


And, she was most probably killed using some type of flash light device which was shined directly at the drivers face, ergo temporary blindness ensues and you have a crash. That's the theory anyway.

Apparently the ambulance took about an hour to get there also.



posted on Jan, 2 2013 @ 09:12 AM
link   

Originally posted by judahslion
Diana was killed because of advanced knowledge of 9/11. Al-Fayed was linked to Al-Qaeda.

For pete's sake, her funeral was practically on 9/11/97. Satan's got a hand in this.


She knew 4 years in advance?

Come on, that's just nonsense...And 'practically' does not work in these situations..For the conspiracy to work it must be exactly the same date, not 3 days before.



posted on Jan, 2 2013 @ 09:25 AM
link   
Despite the amazing love for Diana I didn't have time for her, both her and Charles used the media for 'one up's' and I her roving eye was a lot worse than its being played out, basically she was a bit of a good time gal, if you will.

The question of her being killed is a different story though, I do believe her death was no accident and her interaction with Dodi was the cause, Fyed was no fan of the Monarchy, he despised not being made a Brit but being from Arms Dealers tends to make you no ones PUBLIC friend.

The manner of the death and the number of detailed cover ups was just so in your face you had to see it, hide in plain sight you might say. A death scene systematically wiped down and reopened almost instantly, they spend more time on a crash in the UK let alone a Royal. The car that's missing, the people who died after being witnesses. Henri Paul being a drunk yet was reported to have a massive craving for Pepsi or Coke, his apartment was full of it apparently, a man not known as a drinker and who MUST have been near Diana's bodyguard that night yet he never thought there was an issue, surely a man that drunk would have been easy to spot.

The report of the body being mummified, the fact is that the Royal Family would not have wanted a marriage to both a Muslim and Arms Dealing family, that would never have been allowed.

Like 9/11, there's so much more to this than the 'Official' story, it stinks rotten and where there's power there's ALWAYS corruption!
edit on 2-1-2013 by Mclaneinc because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 2 2013 @ 10:32 AM
link   

Originally posted by Avgudar
Why was she killed?


I think because she was pregnant, she committed adultery, it would impose a wedlock. It would mess up the family tree somewhere. That would make them lose face before the big churches of the world and run the risk of excommunication somewhere.

She disobeyed princess rules. Getting married twice is one of those taboos. Running off with an unapproved suitor from another royal family and getting knocked up is only to be done with permission from the family under end-of-the-world circumstances. Just imagine the in-laws coming to visit every time there was a party, and she would probably have to run off with them and live in Dodi's world. I can see the letters to family now...

All is well here. I'm getting along fine with the other wives. Now that everything I have is his, he's deciding to bring over his brothers from other mothers to talk with you about business, like when can all the investments be written over to his family's name. I would oppose but there is a penalty for disobedience, and only he is allowed to break the marriage contract. Thanks for the designer burkas. From now on all my letters will be in Arabic...

That is a stretch but it could be the weirdness running through security's tentative outlooks when they decided a sabotaging crash was appropriate. The economy revolving around royal publicity would drop; the nation would lose its identity. Royals have duties and it's a gilded cage with big penalties; they can't just become "normal".
edit on 2-1-2013 by Sandalphon because: quote to italic



posted on Jan, 2 2013 @ 11:02 AM
link   
In reply to Vidpci...

Because the British royal family consists of inbred maniacs that walk around Dracula's castle thinking they're a vampire and others that wish to return as a virus... not to even mention the queen's own sisters that were locked up in a tower because they were so insane from the decades of inbreeding.


They were actually the queens cousins, it is a truly tragic how any family could do this to their relatives, but I guess you can't have these poor people tainting the 'royal' bloodline or image


The Queens Hidden Cousins
edit on 2-1-2013 by Severin because: grammar



posted on Jan, 2 2013 @ 11:12 AM
link   
I think there is one vital piece of "evidence" that has yet to have been mentioned.
Not too long before the "accident" the Mercedes had been stolen and, IIRC, been found partially stripped.
The car had to be rebuilt before it was returned to service.
Coincidence? This would have given ( if you are a conspiracy theorist) the "dark forces" the perfect opportunity and time to carry out certain modifications to the car which would render it dangerous.
Its possible that the car could have been controlled remotely, bugged, infact its feasable that the car was stolen by said dark forces to carry out the work before leaving the car to be found etc, etc.
The White Fiat Uno? The car that was found was a standard basic bog stock model with about 60BHP on tap. It wouldnt have got near that Mercedes when it was running at full chat so, theoretically, the White Uno was either the same one which had been modified ( witnesses stated that the car sat very "low" ) with a rechipped Uno Turbo engine in it which, naturally, would have ben returned to standard before it was discovered OR there was another white one...
Its fair to say that there is a whole wealth of circumstantial evidence out there to suggest that it was anything but an accident, however, like most other famous events ( Kennedy assasination etc) the truth will not "out" ever, ever.
Her murder,I dont think it was was carried out on behalf of the Royal family, it would have been carried out by autonomous security services who may have felt that her relationship with Dodi COULD cause embarrasment to the Country and throw up the possible nightmare scenarios, in their eyes, of having the future king of Englands step father not only being Muslim but a step grandfather who has had accusations thrown at him that his business practices were not all above board.
On the balance of probability, yes, i think there was foul play and yes, i think it was a relatively easy task to make her disappear.
Remember the Godfather film? Pacino is going to kill the Police chief and the hoodlum at the Restaurant.
He is told to pull the trigger then slowly let the gun drop to the ground and WALK OUT CALMLY.
People will be in such panic they wont be getting a good look at him, pretty much the same scenario in this case.
Flash of light, horrendous BANG and people are looking INTO the tunnel and not really looking at what emerges too closely.
Bottom line, people can get away with it because too many people assert that " It wouldnt happen!!" "He was drunk!" " He was going too fast!!!"
Maybe.
Dont matter anyway, as ive said, the truth will never be let out of the bag. Its just another dark tale to add to the long list of conspiracy theories.



posted on Jan, 2 2013 @ 11:18 AM
link   

Originally posted by Severin
In reply to Vidpci...

Because the British royal family consists of inbred maniacs that walk around Dracula's castle thinking they're a vampire and others that wish to return as a virus... not to even mention the queen's own sisters that were locked up in a tower because they were so insane from the decades of inbreeding.


They were actually the queens cousins, it is a truly tragic how any family could do this to their relatives, but I guess you can't have these poor people tainting the 'royal' bloodline or image


The Queens Hidden Cousins
edit on 2-1-2013 by Severin because: grammar


It's such a shame that British are brainwashed from birth to worship this scum.

Elizabeth Tower! Give me a break.



posted on Jan, 2 2013 @ 11:21 AM
link   

Originally posted by fastbob72


Personally speaking I've always found the involvement and ations of the white Fiat Uno during that night as the most curious aspect of it all


Can you elaborate on this aspect?
Thanks



posted on Jan, 2 2013 @ 11:59 AM
link   
reply to post by Morg234
 





Henri Paul, the first "covert drunk" in history; walks sober, talks completely sober, only drives like a drunk.



LOL!!! That made my day. You are so funny and so right.



posted on Jan, 2 2013 @ 12:01 PM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Jan, 2 2013 @ 12:33 PM
link   
reply to post by Thunder heart woman
 
Throw this into the mix...Affidavit of Richard Tomlinson

Then poke around that rabbit hole for a bit.



posted on Jan, 2 2013 @ 12:34 PM
link   
Quick question. I am a big fan of searching the web for illuminati puppets, but for some reason today my phone decided to start telling me there were 0 web results. Not even for lady gaga, beyonce...nobody. If curious please tell me how to ad pictures an I will show wou. Did I do too much research to the point where my phone is restricted? Most importantly it happened right after looking up princess DI's death.





top topics
 
29
<< 1  2  3    5  6  7 >>

log in

join