I have just watched that “unlawful killing” documentary everyone is harping on about, it does raise some interesting points but it does not prove
that SIS killed Diana on the orders of the Royal Family.
I did find the predictions Diana made before her death about how she would die and how police officers covered this up is interesting however this is
not new information. It has been reported in the press, anyone who actually reads the Daily Express or the Daily Mail can tell you that the ideas
about the press turning a blind eye is wrong.
For the most part this documentary contains biographical details about the Fayed’s and the Winsor family which is fair enough but again nothing to
prove they killed Diana. Further than this the vast majority of this video is just bad mouthing the Royal family, now I do agree with some points made
against the Royal Family but I also disagree with many of them. Regardless of this, by bad mouthing the Royal family and pointing out how “evil”
they are does not prove that they were complacent in the death of Diana. At times this anti-Royal stance the documentary takes is downright offensive,
I am really sickened that they contacted Diana’s kids to comment on this.
I do have a number of other points of contention, for example there is nothing that proves the Royal Family or SIS had motive enough to justify
assassinating Diana. The main claim made in the documentary regards land mines, in December of 1997 Brittan signed the Ottawa treaty banning
anti-personnel mines so I fail to see how this is any kind of motivation.
I burst out laughing at Peirce Morgan talking about SIS and basing his information on James Bond movies. There is not any prove that SIS where
involved in this other than what Richard Tomlinson has to say, I have read his book, he has quite a lot of gripes with British intelligence. They
sacked him, he tried to sue for unfair dismissal when he was unsuccessful he then broke the official secrets act so he was sent to prison. He does not
like British intelligence and does everything he can do to discredit them. To be clear SIS did really have a plan to use strobe lights in an
assassination but it does not mean that thy done the same to Diana, also this was a plan that was developed by the SBS for the increment if my memory
The conspiracy outlined tries to show that British, French and American intelligence where involved. First of all, the idea of SIS and DGSE working to
gather on this is a bit of a stretch the two groups historically don’t work well together. On the American side the bias of their involvement is
form the NSA intercepts, most likely these intercepts where done at the request of GCHQ under the ECHELON program, that is to say it was the British
who requested the intercepts that the intelligence product was intended for them. Again many high profile figures have had this happen to them in the
past, it’s not surprising that they would keep tabs on Diana nor is it proof that they wanted her dead.
The documentary also asks why it took over an hour for her to get to the hospital. I have some incite to this as a young student nurse I spent some
time working in A&E part of which involved a day out with an ambulance crew. It is not uncommon for it to take over an hour even longer than that to
get somebody out of a car, furthermore based on my own reading on this Diana had a cardiac arrest at the scene. Just because she was conscious after
the crash does not mean that her eventual death is unusual, it happens quite a lot she had massive internal injuries and would have been hypovolemic.
Overall this documentary is massively bias to the conspiracy side of things based on a grieving father who funded the documentary. There are multiple
errors for example when discussing the verdict of the Jury, yes they ruled unlawful killing but it was unlawful killing by the negligent driving of
Henri Paul and the perusing vehicles. There are a number of other inaccuracies for example the paparazzi where present at the scene, some of them
where even arrested.
There are so many issues with this documentary I could go on all day listing its flaws but fundamentally it does not prove that SIS under the
direction of Prince Philip.
edit on 5-1-2013 by OtherSideOfTheCoin because: (no reason given)